Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 23;256:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.08.014

Table 3.

Correlations of LV-SCOPE domains with each other and demographic and clinical characteristics.

Mobility Object
localization
Object
recognition
Reading Social
functioning
Technology
Domains
 Mobility --- 0.77 0.62 0.60 0.62 0.52
 Object localization 0.77 --- 0.74 0.68 0.72 0.68
 Object recognition 0.62 0.74 --- 0.87 0.87 0.84
 Reading 0.60 0.68 0.87 --- 0.78 0.89
 Social functioning 0.62 0.72 0.87 0.78 --- 0.75
 Technology 0.52 0.68 0.84 0.89 0.75 ---
Convergent Validity (NEI-VFQ-25) 1
 Composite score −0.73 −0.75 −0.78 −0.78 −0.75 −0.75
Discriminant Validity (PHQ-4)
 Score 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.18 0.16
Visual acuity, logMAR
 Better eye 0.40 0.44 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.58
 Worse eye 0.31 0.35 0.46 0.43 0.44 0.38
SAP visual field mean deviation, decibels 1
 Better eye −0.40 −0.46 −0.43 −0.45 −0.43 −0.40
 Worse eye −0.32 −0.30 −0.32 −0.37 −0.31 −0.38
Kinetic perimetry maximum horizontal extent, degrees 1
 Better eye −0.26 −0.31 −0.41 −0.39 −0.47 −0.36
 Worse eye −0.33 −0.34 −0.45 −0.41 −0.48 −0.38
Age (years)
 Age −0.19 −0.17 −0.04 0.00 −0.12 0.02

NEI-VFQ: National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire, PHQ: Patient Health Questionnaire, SAP: standard automated perimetry

1

These correlations are negative since LV-SCOPE measures disability and the NEI-VFQ and perimetric tests measure ability