Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Seizure. 2023 Nov 26;114:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.11.018

Older Adults with Epilepsy and COVID-19: Outcomes in a Multi-Hospital Health System

Claire Ufongene a, Grace Van Hyfte b,c, Parul Agarwal b,c, Jonathan Goldstein a, Brian Mathew b, Alison Navis b, Louise McCarthy b, Churl-Su Kwon d, Kapil Gururangan b, Priti Balchandani e, Lara Marcuse b, Georges Naasan b, Anuradha Singh b, James Young b, Alexander Charney f, Girish Nadkarni g, Nathalie Jette b,c,*, Leah J Blank b,c,*; Sinai NeuroCOVID-19 Study Group
PMCID: PMC10841585  NIHMSID: NIHMS1948614  PMID: 38039805

Abstract

Background:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity in older adults, especially those with pre-existing conditions. There is little work investigating how neurological conditions affect older adults with COVID-19. We aimed to compare in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, in older adults with and without epilepsy.

Methods:

This retrospective study in a large multicenter New York health system included consecutive older patients (age ≥65 years) either with or without epilepsy who were admitted with COVID-19 between 3/2020–5/2021. Epilepsy was identified using a validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) and antiseizure medication-based case definition. Univariate comparisons were calculated using Chi-square, Fisher‟s exact, Mann-Whitney U, or Student‟s t-tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were generated to examine factors associated with mortality, discharge disposition and length of stay (LOS).

Results:

We identified 5384 older adults admitted with COVID-19 of whom 173 (3.21%) had epilepsy. Mean age was significantly lower in those with (75.44, standard deviation (SD): 7.23) compared to those without epilepsy (77.98, SD: 8.68, p=0.007). Older adults with epilepsy were more likely to be ventilated (35.84% vs. 16.18%, p<0.001), less likely to be discharged home (21.39% vs. 43.12%, p<0.001), had longer median LOS (13 days vs. 8 days, p<0.001), and had higher in-hospital death (35.84% vs. 28.29%, p=0.030) compared to those without epilepsy. Epilepsy in older adults was associated with increased odds of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.55; 95% CI 1.12–2.14, p=0.032), non-routine discharge disposition (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI 2.21–5.03, p<0.001), and longer LOS (46.46% 95% CI 34%−59%, p<0.001).

Conclusions:

In models that adjusted for multiple confounders including comorbidity and age, our study found that epilepsy was still associated with higher in-hospital mortality, longer LOS and worse discharge dispositions in older adults with COVID-19 higher in-hospital mortality, longer LOS and worse discharge dispositions in older adults with COVID-19. This work reinforces that epilepsy is a risk factor for worse outcomes in older adults admitted with COVID-19. Timely identification and treatment of COVID-19 in epilepsy may improve outcomes in older people with epilepsy.

Keywords: hospitalization, SARS-CoV-2, comorbidity, seizure, mortality

Introduction:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused disproportionate morbidity and mortality in older adults, especially those with pre-existing conditions.1, 2 3 While certain pre-existing conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease have been associated with COVID-19 severity in older adults,2 the contribution of other chronic diseases to mortality and morbidity have been less well studied. There is little work investigating how neurological conditions, specifically epilepsy, affect older adults with COVID-19.

Epilepsy is among the most common chronic neurologic disorders and is most prevalent in older adult who comprise up to 25% of new epilepsy diagnoses.4 As such, epilepsy affects a significant portion of our aging population, who are themselves already at increased risk from COVID-19.1 The literature on the association between epilepsy and hospital outcomes with COVID-19 in those of all ages is variable: some studies suggest that those with epilepsy have higher rates of morbidity and mortality,5,6, 7 while others report no added risk in individuals with epilepsy and COVID-19.8,9, 10 How these findings may differ in older adults who are already at higher risk of death from COVID-19 is unknown.

We sought to understand whether epilepsy was associated with in-hospital mortality in older adults hospitalized with COVID-19. In addition, we sought to understand the relationship between age and epilepsy in those with COVID-19 and other hospitalization outcomes including length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition. Because epilepsy is associated with premature mortality, we hypothesized that older adults with epilepsy would experience worse in-hospital outcomes compared to older adults without epilepsy.11

Methods

Data Source

Electronic medical record (EMR) data from the Mount Sinai Health System‟s (MSHS) Clinical Intelligence Center (MSCIC) were used in a retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes in people with COVID-19 with and without epilepsy between March 15, 2020 and May 17, 2021. The MSCIC gathered data across five participating MSHS hospitals, including admissions data, sociodemographic information, diagnostic codes, as well as clinical information (e.g., medications, laboratories). The catchment area for the MSHS includes New York City‟s (NYC) five boroughs and the greater New York City area. As a result, the MSHS serves a primarily urban but socioeconomically and racially diverse population.

Study Cohort

The study cohort consisted of 9,833 hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. Eligible patients had to have a positive or presumptive positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test (96.42% had a positive PCR and 3.58% were presumed positive) in the emergency department (ED) or during their inpatient admission to the MSHS, regardless of age. In the beginning of the pandemic, due to shortage of tests, all patients admitted to NYC hospitals were tested for COVID-19 if symptomatic or if they reported a COVID-19 exposure independent of any co-existing risk factors. Within a few weeks, however, all patients entering the hospital were tested regardless of symptoms or exposure. For those with more than one admission during the study period, the first COVID-19 positive inpatient admission was defined as the index admission.

International Classification of Diseases ninth or tenth revision clinical modification classification codes (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM) with antiseizure medications (ASM) one year prior and up to admission were used to identify people with epilepsy. The case definition for epilepsy consisted of a patient having either (1) an epilepsy specific diagnostic code (ICD-9-CM [345.x (except 345.2 and 345.3)] or ICD-10-CM code [G40.x (except G40.xx1)] in any diagnostic position) +/− an ASM or (2) a status epilepticus or seizure code (ICD-9-CM (345.2, 345.3, or 780.3x) or ICD-10-CM codes (G40.xx1, G41.x, or R56.x) in any diagnostic position) with at least one ASM (Supplement 1 (S1)). This epilepsy case definition has been validated in our health system (sensitivity 95%, specificity 72%, positive predictive value 80%, negative predictive value 92%).12 Individuals were excluded from the study if they had unknown/missing (1) discharge dates; (2) ICD codes; (3) medication information; or (4) sex (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Diagram for the COVID-19 positive cohort selection

Study Measures

Outcomes

The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, and length of stay (LOS). For the discharge disposition analysis, we excluded patients who had a discharge status as “expired.” Discharge disposition was then categorized as routine or non-routine, where routine discharges were defined as discharge home and non-routine included discharges anywhere other than home. Examples of non-routine discharge include but are not limited to: discharges to skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation facilities, chronic care facilities, and discharge against medical advice (AMA).

Secondary outcomes were ventilation status (none/nasal cannula/high flow nasal cannula), bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), ventilator support; and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Individuals who did not have ventilation status information and who were not admitted to the ICU were assumed to be on room air for the duration of their admission.

Covariates

Age, sex, race or ethnicity, primary language, insurance type, hospital, smoking status, alcohol and substance use, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hypertension, and period of admission (March 2020 – July 2020, August 2020 – December 2020, and January 2021 – May 2021) were obtained. The CCI was defined using standardized validated ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes.13

Blood pressure, oxygen level, weight, and other vital signs through admission were captured from the EMR. Laboratory tests found in previous studies to be associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes were summarized over the hospital stay and by reporting the median of the individual‟s highest (white blood cell count, creatinine, procalcitonin, D-dimer, ferritin, C reactive protein, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, prothrombin time (PT)), and lowest (hemoglobin, platelet count, and albumin) observed values.14,15 Medications prescribed during the hospital stay were summarized by pharmacologic class as it relates to COVID-19 treatment (S1).

Statistical Analysis

All outcomes and covariates were described using summary statistics: frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. Due to low sample size among patients with epilepsy, Hispanic, Asian, Alaska Native/American Indian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, and people of reported “other” or unknown race were included as „other race‟ for analytic purposes. Variables with greater than 10% missingness (alcohol use, illicit substance use, smoking status) were multiply imputed. These variables had no clear pattern of missingness (missingness appeared to be random) likely due to individual clinician EMR documentation methods. These variables were then multiply imputed using SAS software‟s PROC MI specifying the fully conditional specification (FCS) logistic regression method with “glogit” link function. All covariates intended for regression modeling were used to impute missing variables and 10 imputations were performed in order to achieve >97% relative efficiency in each variable.16 We compared discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality, and LOS in those with and without epilepsy over 65 years of age and in those with epilepsy under and over 65 years of age.

Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association of epilepsy with mortality and discharge disposition in older adults. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to show how the proportions of patients‟ LOS changed over time after censoring patients who died in the hospital, were discharged AMA, or had stays exceeding 100 days (N=2) (Figure 2). The log-rank test was performed and p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. Ordinary least squares regression (OLS) was performed to examine the association between LOS in older patients with and without epilepsy who were COVID-19 positive (Table 2). To correct for skewness, LOS was log-transformed (LOS shorter than one day were considered as one day). OLS model covariates represent the percentage change in the LOS for one unit of change in the covariate (i.e., percentage change = eβ−1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve of length of stay in COVID-19 positive older adults stratified by epilepsy status

Table 2.

Multivariable logistic regression of in-hospital mortality and discharge disposition in older adults with COVID-19; ordinary least squares regression with log-transformed length of stay in older adults with COVID-19

Variable Adults 65 or older
In-Hospital Mortality Non-Routine Discharge Disposition Length of Stay
AOR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value % Difference from Mean (95% CI) P-value
Epilepsy
 No epilepsy Reference Reference Reference
 Epilepsy 1.55 (1.12, 2.14) 0.032 3.34 (2.21, 5.03) <0.001 46.46% (34%, 59%) <0.001
Age 1.04 (1.03, 1.05) <0.001 1.05 (1.05, 1.06) <0.001 0.32% (0.08%, 0.57%) 0.044
Sex
 Female Reference Reference Reference
 Male 1.40 (1.24, 1.58) <0.001 1.14 (1.00, 1.31) 0.232 −0.84% (−5.16%, 3.48%) 1
Language
 English Reference Reference Reference
 Spanish 1.08 (0.89, 1.30) 1 0.87 (0.70, 1.07) 0.772 −6.44% (−13.11%, 0.22%) 0.184
 Other 1.35 (1.11, 1.63) 0.008 0.82 (0.65, 1.04) 0.392 −2.23% (−9.35%, 4.88%) 1
Race
 Non-Hispanic White Reference Reference Reference
 Non-Hispanic Black 1.01 (0.86, 1.20) 1 1.20 (1.01, 1.44) 0.176 −2.11% (−7.99%, 3.78%) 1
 Other 1.06 (0.91, 1.23) 1 0.82 (0.69, 0.96) 0.064 −2.76% (−8.06%, 2.54%) 1
CCI 1.07 (1.03, 1.10) <0.001 1.09 (1.05, 1.13) <0.001 9.71% (8.54%, 10.89%) <0.001

Note: CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index, CI = confidence interval, AOR = adjusted odds ratio

All multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, language, race or ethnicity and CCI. The odds ratios from the multivariable models are reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR). For all analyses except Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) version 9.4 was used (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). R 4.1.2 (Vienna, Austria) was used to do Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. The level of significance in all tests was measured at 0.05.

To test the difference in in-hospital mortality across time in adults 65 and older with and without epilepsy, we assessed for trend using the autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation functions. This analysis showed that the time series data had no significant autocorrelation, with no seasonality. We then fitted two nested analysis of variance models examining equal and varying slopes across the time period and epilepsy diagnosis. The F-test was used to compare the two models. Finally, to further analyze the the interaction between time period and epilepsy status a non-parametric ANCOVA was performed using “sm.ancova()” from R‟s “sm” package.

Standard Protocol Approval

The study was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine Institutional Review Board under protocol number IRB-20–03271.

Data Availability Statement

Researchers with the appropriate credentials, IRB training, and certification can apply to the senior authors to request access after a data use agreement has been executed with Mount Sinai.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Between March 2020 and May 2021, we identified 5384 individuals ages 65 years or older admitted with COVID-19; 173 (3.21%) of these older adults also had an epilepsy diagnosis (Figure 1). Table 1 shows the patient and hospital characteristics for this cohort. Mean age was statistically significantly lower for those with epilepsy compared to those without epilepsy (75.44, SD: 7.23 vs. 77.98, SD: 8.68, p=0.007). The majority of patients were English speaking in both groups, but a larger proportion of individuals were Spanish speaking in those without epilepsy (15.28% vs. 9.83%, p=0.039). A larger proportion of older adults with epilepsy had cerebrovascular disease (29.48% vs. 6.54, p<0.001), congestive heart failure (18.50% vs. 13.05%, p=0.037), dementia (20.81% vs. 9.54%, p<0.001), and either paraplegia or hemiplegia (1.73% vs. 0.42%, p=0.045) compared to those without epilepsy. Older adults with epilepsy were also more likely to be ventilated (35.84% vs. 16.18%, p<0.001), were less likely to be discharged home (21.39% vs. 43.12%, p<0.001), had a longer median LOS (13 days vs. 8 days, p<0.001) and were more likely to die in the hospital (35.84% vs. 28.29%, p=0.030) compared to those without epilepsy (Table 1). Older adults with epilepsy also more frequently had inflammatory or coagulation biomarkers previously reported to be associated with more severe COVID-19 than those without epilepsy (S2).14, 15

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and outcomes in COVID-19 positive older adults stratified by epilepsy status

Overall Epilepsy No epilepsy P-value
N % N % N %
5384 100.00 173 3.21 5211 96.79
Baseline Characteristics
Age (mean, SD) 77.90 8.65 75.44 7.23 77.98 8.68 0.007
Sex 0.891
 Female 2704 50.22 86 49.71 2618 50.24
 Male 2680 49.78 87 50.29 2593 49.76
Race 0.220
 Hispanic 51 0.95 1 0.58 50 0.96
 Non-Hispanic Asian 288 5.35 6 3.47 282 5.41
 Non-Hispanic Black 1257 23.35 50 28.9 1207 23.16
 Non-Hispanic White 1763 32.75 59 34.10 1704 32.70
 Other 1826 33.92 48 27.75 1778 34.12
 Unknown 199 3.70 9 5.20 190 3.65
Primary language 0.039
 English 3999 74.28 144 83.24 3855 73.98
 Spanish 813 15.09 17 9.83 796 15.28
 Other 457 8.49 8 4.62 449 8.62
 Unknown 115 2.14 4 2.31 111 2.13
Insurance type 0.069
 Private 931 17.29 27 15.61 904 17.35
 Medicaid 1862 34.58 72 41.62 1790 34.35
 Medicare 2236 41.53 70 40.46 2166 41.57
 Other 332 6.17 3 1.73 329 6.31
 Unknown 23 0.43 1 0.58 22 0.42
Smoking status 0.002
 Current use 194 3.60 6 3.47 188 3.61
 Previous use 1553 28.84 55 31.79 1498 28.75
 Never use 2937 54.55 74 42.77 2863 54.94
 Never asked 700 13.00 38 21.97 662 12.70
Alcohol use 0.845
 Yes 872 16.20 26 15.03 846 16.23
 No/Not currently 3590 66.68 116 67.05 3474 66.67
 Never 922 17.12 31 17.92 891 17.10
Illicit Substance use 0.216
 Yes 116 2.15 10 5.78 106 2.03
 No/Not currently 3438 63.86 111 64.16 3327 63.85
 Never 1830 33.99 52 30.06 1778 34.12
Date of admission 0.438
 March 2020-July 2020 2747 51.02 86 49.71 2661 51.07
 August 2020-December 2020 856 15.90 23 13.29 833 15.99
 January 2021-May 2021 1781 33.08 64 36.99 1717 32.95
Charlson comorbidity index
 Overall index, median [range] 1 [0, 17] 1 [0, 17] 1 [0, 15] 0.001
 Myocardial infarction 387 7.19 16 9.25 371 7.12 0.286
 Congestive heart failure 712 13.22 32 18.50 680 13.05 0.037
 Peripheral vascular disease 287 5.33 10 5.78 277 5.32 0.789
 Cerebrovascular disease 392 7.28 51 29.48 341 6.54 <0.001
 Dementia 533 9.90 36 20.81 497 9.54 <0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease 518 9.62 14 8.09 504 9.67 0.488
 Rheumatic disease 56 1.04 1 0.58 55 1.06 1
 Peptic ulcer disease 29 0.54 2 1.16 27 0.52 0.239
 Mild liver disease 109 2.02 3 1.73 106 2.03 1
 Diabetes without complications 1263 23.46 49 28.32 1214 23.30 0.125
 Diabetes with complications 242 4.49 8 4.62 234 4.49 0.933
 Paraplegia or hemiplegia 25 0.46 3 1.73 22 0.42 0.045
 Renal disease 718 13.34 27 15.61 691 13.26 0.372
 Cancer 335 6.22 14 8.09 321 6.16 0.301
 Moderate - severe liver disease 19 0.35 1 0.58 18 0.35 0.463
 Metastatic carcinoma 73 1.36 3 1.73 70 1.34 0.509
 HIV 47 0.87 3 1.73 44 0.84 0.191
Hypertension * 2210 41.05 76 43.93 2134 40.95 0.433
Outcomes
Worst ventilation status <0.001
None 807 14.99 21 12.14 786 15.08
Nasal flow cannula/mask 1819 33.79 36 20.81 1783 34.22
Non-rebreather/High flow nasal cannula 1267 23.53 40 23.12 1227 23.55
BIPAP/CPAP 586 10.88 14 8.09 572 10.98
Ventilator 905 16.81 62 35.84 843 16.18
Discharge disposition <0.001
Home 2284 42.42 37 21.39 2247 43.12
AMA 43 0.80 2 1.16 41 0.79
Rehab/subacute care 241 4.48 12 6.94 229 4.39
Other acute care facility 445 8.27 23 13.29 422 8.10
Other 37 0.69 0 0 37 0.71
Chronic care facility 679 12.61 34 19.65 645 12.38
Hospice 119 2.21 3 1.73 116 2.23
Died 1536 28.53 62 35.84 1474 28.29
Vital status 0.03
Discharged alive 3848 71.47 111 64.16 3737 71.71
Died in hospital 1536 28.53 62 35.84 1474 28.29
Overall length of stay (median [Q1, Q3]) 8 [4, 14] 13 [7, 26] 8 [4, 14] <0.001
ICU admission 969 18.00 60 34.68 909 17.44 <0.001
ICU length of stay (median [Q1, Q3]) 6.5 [3, 13] 12 [4, 22.5] 6 [2, 13] 0.008

Note: AMA = against medical advice, ICU = intensive care unit,

*

Hypertension includes complicated and uncomplicated hypertension

In-Hospital Mortality

In multivariable models, epilepsy was associated with increased odds of in-hospital death (aOR, 1.55; 95% CI 1.12–2.14, p=0.032) in older hospitalized adults with COVID-19 (Table 2). Increasing age (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.03–1.05, p<0.001), male sex (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI 1.24–1.58, p<0.001), and higher comorbidity burden (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI 1.03–1.10, p<0.001 per one point increase in CCI) were also associated with mortality. In supplementary analyses looking at patients with epilepsy of all ages, age over 65 years was the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI 1.22–3.40, p=0.012) (S3).

Discharge Disposition

In our multivariable models, epilepsy (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI 2.21–5.03, p<0.001), increasing age (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI 1.05–1.06, p<0.001 per one-year increase in age), and higher comorbidity burden (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.05–1.13, p<0.001 per one-point increase in CCI) were all significantly associated with non-routine discharge (Table 2).

Length of Stay

The following variables were associated with longer LOS in the multivariable logistic regression: epilepsy (46.46% longer LOS; 95% CI 34%−59%, p<0.001), increasing age (0.32% longer LOS; 95% CI 0.08%−0.57%, p=0.044 per one-year increase in age), and higher comorbidity (9.71% longer LOS; 95% CI 8.54%−10.89%, p<0.001 per one-point increase in CCI) (Table 2). Older adults with epilepsy also had greater cumulative probability of having a LOS longer than older adults without epilepsy (p<0.0001) (Figure 2). For example, older adults with epilepsy were more likely (56.34% vs. 35.72%) to have a LOS longer than 14 days compared to older adults without epilepsy.

Discussion:

Overall, our results confirm that older adults are more at risk for severe disease and complications when infected with SARS-CoV-2. We also found that older hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and epilepsy had higher mortality, longer LOS, and poorer discharge disposition than older adults without epilepsy. Hospitalized older adults with COVID-19 and epilepsy were also more likely than older adults without epilepsy to be mechanically ventilated, less likely to be discharged home, and more frequently had inflammatory and coagulation markers previously reported to be associated with increased COVID-19 disease severity.14, 15

Our findings align with previous research that older adults with pre-existing neurological conditions have a higher rate of mortality with COVID-19.17 While there are limited studies on the pathogenesis behind increased disease severity in epilepsy and COVID-19 and even fewer on older adults with epilepsy, there have been several studies investigating other neurological conditions.18 Hypotheses on why neurological conditions lead to increased COVID-19 disease severity appear to be multifactorial. For example, those with dementia may be at higher risk of more rapid cognitive impairment with infection. Similarly, those with Parkinson‟s disease can suffer from dysphagia leading to aspiration pneumonia. Many patients with pre-existing neurological conditions also have comorbid cerebrovascular diagnoses, with epilepsy in older adults often being secondary to stroke.19 Studies investigating pre-existing cerebrovascular disease in older adults hypothesize that the combination of an older immune system and previous organ damage from comorbid disorders allow the viral-induced cytokine storm caused by COVID-19 to be associated with even more severe multisystemic effects and increased mortality.17,20

Our study also found that older adults with COVID-19 and epilepsy had significantly longer LOS than those without epilepsy. There are a variety of factors that contribute to a patient requiring prolonged care or delayed discharge.21 In the setting of COVID-19, longer LOS have previously been associated with increased disease severity. Need for ventilation is associated with severe disease; in our patient population, older adults with epilepsy were ventilated significantly more than older adults without epilepsy.3,21 Moreover, disease severity may also correlate with the level of various inflammatory or coagulation biomarkers, such as D-dimer, during acute infection. These are thought to reflect the ongoing inflammatory damage caused by SARS-CoV-2. Again, the group with epilepsy had higher levels of inflammatory markers that have been previously associated with COVID-19 disease and its severity.15, 22 Higher need for mechanical ventilation and higher inflammatory markers in the group with epilepsy support the idea that those with epilepsy had more severe illness requiring significantly longer LOS.

Lastly, our work showed that older adults with COVID-19 and epilepsy were more often discharged to a location other than their home. As with LOS and mortality, we suspect this finding is likely multifactorial in etiology. It most likely reflects a combination of increased severity of COVID-19 infection, requiring additional rehabilitation after hospitalization as well as possibly worse functional status at baseline in those with epilepsy. This is because people with epilepsy are more likely to have pre-existing neurologic disease that impairs physical functioning and cognition (e.g. traumatic brain injury, stroke), which could affect their ability to care for themselves.

This study has several strengths. It is a large epidemiological study specifically looking at epilepsy and COVID-19 hospital outcomes specifically in older adults with epilepsy for which the data are scarce. This cohort also allowed us to compare outcomes between people of different races or ethnicity which were previously reported to be associated with different outcomes in the setting of COVID-19.23, 24 Finally, our EMR data allowed us to confirm COVID-19 diagnoses via PCR tests.

There are, however, several limitations to this study. Firstly, our analysis includes a large sample and attempts to adjust for multiple known risk factors for poorer COVID-19 outcomes including age and comorbidity (and those associated with COVID-19 such as cardiovascular disease), however it should be acknowledged that residual confounding variables may contribute to bias in the results. Additionally, epilepsy diagnosis was ascertained using ICD-CM codes and ASMs, which could lead to misclassification if the coding was incorrect. However, we used an ICD-CM and ASM-based case definition that our group has validated in our health system.12, 13 Similarly, other comorbidities included in this study were identified using ICD-CM based definitions validated in different US samples. Second, the study took place in a large, multi-hospital system geographically located in New York City and our results may therefore not be generalizable to other populations. However, we believe these data are likely broadly applicable as it uses data from a number of different hospitals within a large system (not only a tertiary/quaternary referral center) and it draws on an international, racially, ethnically and linguistically diverse patient population. Third, our study is restricted to hospitalized patients. As such, it is unknown whether the factors found to be associated with our outcomes of interest including mortality would be different in a community-based cohort or with longer follow-up times. An additional limitation is that our dataset does not include full information about epilepsy type (e.g. convulsive seizures) or epilepsy severity. Moreover, we do not have information regarding epilepsy etiology or outpatient anti-seizure medication type or dose. Lastly, we have information on discharge disposition but not on where patients were admitted from (e.g. some were likely admitted from nursing homes) and this may have influenced eventual discharge location although we believe this would likely be a non-differential mis-classification.

Conclusion:

We found that among older adults with COVID-19, epilepsy was associated with in-hospital mortality, LOS and worse discharge disposition. Our work confirmed that older age and comorbid disease are associated with worse outcomes in those with COVID-19. These findings may inform future studies of COVID-19 outcomes with long-term ambulatory data, to help design care pathways for multimorbid older populations. Moreover, these findings suggest that clinicians should consider older adults with epilepsy as being higher risk for poor outcomes which is important for counselling about the risks and benefits of vaccination and other preventative measures. Finally, this work suggests potential health and mortality benefits of earlier detection and more aggressive treatment of COVID-19 in older adults with epilepsy.

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights.

  • Older adults with epilepsy had significantly higher in-hospital mortality with COVID-19 than those without epilepsy even after adjusting for multiple confounders.

  • Older adults with epilepsy and COVID-19 also have longer length of stay and poorer discharge disposition than those without epilepsy.

  • Epilepsy is a risk factor for worse hospitalization outcomes in older adults admitted with COVID-19.

Conflict of Interest:

LJB has received support from the American Epilepsy Society, the NORSE Institute, the Epilepsy Foundation, the Mount Sinai Claude D Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (5P30AG028741-11) and Research Training for the Care of Vulnerable Older Adults with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Other Chronic Conditions (T32-AG066598). PA receives grant funding paid to her institution for grants unrelated to this work from NIH HD100544, NIH PD22-01299 and SU2C 6209. She receives an honorarium for her work as an Assistant Editor of Statistics of Anesthesia & Analgesia. NJ has received grant funding paid to her institution for grants unrelated to this work from NINDS (NIH U24NS107201, NIH IU54NS100064, 3R01CA202911-05S1, R21NS122389, R01HL161847), the American Epilepsy Society, the NORSE Institute and PCORI. She is the Bludhorn Professor of International Medicine. She receives an honorarium for her work as an Associate Editor of Epilepsia. The remaining authors report no disclosures.

Sponsor’s Role:

This study was funded by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Medical Student Training in Aging Research Program through the National Institute on Aging Grant T35AG067578-01 (CU).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Chen Y, Klein SL, Garibaldi BT, et al. Aging in COVID-19: Vulnerability, immunity and intervention. Ageing Res Rev 2021;65:101205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Treskova-Schwarzbach M, Haas L, Reda S, et al. Pre-existing health conditions and severe COVID-19 outcomes: an umbrella review approach and meta-analysis of global evidence. BMC Med 2021;19:212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Network C-IGobotR, the C-ICUI. Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2021;47:60–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghosh S, Jehi LE. New-onset epilepsy in the elderly: challenges for the internist. Cleve Clin J Med 2014;81:490–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kubota T, Kuroda N. Exacerbation of neurological symptoms and COVID-19 severity in patients with preexisting neurological disorders and COVID-19: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021;200:106349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cabezudo-Garcia P, Ciano-Petersen NL, Mena-Vazquez N, Pons-Pons G, Castro-Sanchez MV, Serrano-Castro PJ. Incidence and case fatality rate of COVID-19 in patients with active epilepsy. Neurology 2020;95:e1417–e1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siahaan YMT, Ketaren RJ, Hartoyo V, Hariyanto TI. Epilepsy and the risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Epilepsy Behav 2021;125:108437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Danoun OA, Zillgitt A, Hill C, et al. Outcomes of seizures, status epilepticus, and EEG findings in critically ill patient with COVID-19. Epilepsy Behav 2021;118:107923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gao Y, Chen Y, Liu M, et al. Nervous system diseases are associated with the severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect 2021;149:e66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balestrini S, Wilson G, Eldred C, Evans H, Sisodiya SM. The impact of COVID-19 in Dravet syndrome: A UK survey. Acta Neurol Scand 2021;143:389–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lowerison MW, Josephson CB, Jette N, et al. Association of Levels of Specialized Care With Risk of Premature Mortality in Patients With Epilepsy. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1352–1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lemus H, Goldstein J, Tai H-H, et al. Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM Based Algorithms to Identify Epilepsy in Electronic Health Records. American Epilepsy Society Conference American Epilepsy Society Conference; 2021; Chicago, Illinois. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Z, Zheutlin A, Kao YH, et al. Hospitalised COVID-19 patients of the Mount Sinai Health System: a retrospective observational study using the electronic medical records. BMJ Open 2020;10:e040441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brojakowska A, Eskandari A, Bisserier M, et al. Comorbidities, sequelae, blood biomarkers and their associated clinical outcomes in the Mount Sinai Health System COVID-19 patients. PLoS One 2021;16:e0253660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Smith C, Kosten S. Multiple Imputation: A Statistical Programming Story. PharmSUG; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perrotta F, Corbi G, Mazzeo G, et al. COVID-19 and the elderly: insights into pathogenesis and clinical decision-making. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020;32:1599–1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Amruta N, Chastain WH, Paz M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 mediated neuroinflammation and the impact of COVID-19 in neurological disorders. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2021;58:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu S, Yu W, Lu Y. The causes of new-onset epilepsy and seizures in the elderly. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016;12:1425–1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Muller L, Di Benedetto S, Pawelec G. The Immune System and Its Dysregulation with Aging. Subcell Biochem 2019;91:21–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu X, Zhou H, Zhou Y, et al. Risk factors associated with disease severity and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. J Infect 2020;81:e95–e97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kukoc A, Mihelcic A, Miko I, et al. Clinical and laboratory predictors at ICU admission affecting course of illness and mortality rates in a tertiary COVID-19 center. Heart Lung 2022;53:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Price-Haywood EG, Burton J, Fort D, Seoane L. Hospitalization and Mortality among Black Patients and White Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2534–2543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Katz J, Yue S, Xue W. Increased risk for COVID-19 in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Nutrition 2021;84:111106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Data Availability Statement

Researchers with the appropriate credentials, IRB training, and certification can apply to the senior authors to request access after a data use agreement has been executed with Mount Sinai.

RESOURCES