TABLE 2.
Variable | Coefficient | 95% CI | P |
---|---|---|---|
Longitudinal submodela | |||
Intercept | 0.39 | 0.29 to 0.48 | |
Treatment (CT + B v CT) | 0.01 | –0.11 to 0.14 | .862 |
Baseline lNLR (≥1.10 v <1.10) | 0.52 | 0.38 to 0.65 | <.001 |
Treatment × baseline lNLR | –0.26 | –0.47 to –0.06 | .012 |
Variable | Coefficient | 95% CI | P | HR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survival submodel | |||||
Treatment (CT + B v CT) in baseline lNLR <1.10 group | –0.41 | –0.79 to –0.03 | .037 | 0.66 | 0.45 to 0.98 |
Baseline lNLR (≥1.10 v <1.10) in CT + B group | 0.56 | 0.10 to 1.02 | .017 | 1.75 | 1.10 to 2.77 |
Treatment × baseline lNLR | 0.90 | 0.30 to 1.50 | .003 | ||
Assoc | 1.39 | 0.95 to 1.82 | <.001 | 4.00 | 2.60 to 6.17 |
Abbreviations: B, bevacizumab; CT, chemotherapy; CT + B, chemotherapy + bevacizumab; HR, hazard ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.
The regression coefficients for the natural cubic splines were omitted as not directly interpretable.