Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2023 Nov 27;66(2):195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.026

Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm Injuries in the United States, 2019 and 2020

Gabrielle F Miller 1, Sarah Beth Barnett 1, Curtis Florence 1, Kathleen McDavid Harrison 2, Linda Dahlberg 2, James A Mercy 2
PMCID: PMC10843794  NIHMSID: NIHMS1948460  PMID: 38010238

Abstract

Introduction:

Firearm-related injuries are among the five leading causes of death for people ages 1–44 years in the U.S. The immediate and long-term harms of firearm injuries pose an economic burden on society. Fatal and nonfatal firearm injury costs in the U.S. were estimated providing up-to-date economic burden estimates.

Methods:

Counts of nonfatal firearm injuries were obtained from the 2019–2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Data on nonfatal injury intent were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – Firearm Injury Surveillance System. Counts of deaths (firearm underlying cause) were obtained from 2019–2020 multiple cause-of-death mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System. Analyses were conducted in 2023.

Results:

The total nonfatal and fatal cost of firearm-related injuries for 2020 was $493.2 billion. Nonfatal firearm injuries and costs increased by 20% from 2019 to 2020. There are significant disparities in the cost of firearm deaths in 2019–2020, with non-Hispanic Black people, males, and young and middle-aged groups being most affected.

Conclusions:

The majority of nonfatal firearm injury-related costs are attributed to hospitalization. These findings highlight the racial/ethnic differences in fatal firearm injuries and the disproportionate cost burden to urban areas. Addressing this important public health problem can help ameliorate the costs to our society of rising rates of firearm injuries.

Keywords: Firearm, cost, economic burden

Introduction

Estimates of the economic burden of firearm injuries in the U.S. provide an important source of information for decision makers in making critical resource allocation determinations.1 Firearm-related injuries are among the five leading causes of death for people ages 1–44 years in the U.S. and account for 7.9% of premature death or years of potential life lost before the age of 65 years.2 In the U.S. 45,222 people died from a firearm-related injury in 2020.2 Most of these deaths were firearm suicides (54%), reflecting the high case fatality rate when firearms are used in attempts. On average, more than twice as many people suffer nonfatal firearm-related injuries than die each year and most of these injuries are from assaults (76%), followed by unintentional injuries (19%).3 Firearm-related deaths and nonfatal injuries are not distributed equally in the population or across communities. Young age (except in the case of firearm suicide where rates are highest among adults aged 70+), being male, race/ethnicity, and structural conditions such as poverty and income inequality are among some of the factors that distinguish population groups and communities most at risk of firearm-related injuries and deaths.2, 46

Firearm injuries are associated with a range of physical and mental health consequences with impacts that can be life-long for victims and their families7 and that can also affect mental health and feelings of safety and security in communities.8, 9 The immediate and long-term harms of firearm injuries also pose an economic burden on society. There is a broad literature on the costs of firearm injuries and cost of crime that use a variety of methods, perspectives, and include a range of cost categories.1012 Prior studies over the past 25 years have examined the costs of emergency department visits, hospitalization, and/or readmission for firearm injuries,1319 particularly in pediatric populations.2030 Many studies focus on nonfatal firearm injuries and associated cost burden on hospitals, the health care system, and insurers. Few studies cover societal costs for both nonfatal and fatal firearm injuries across population groups and there is a dearth of studies in recent decades that include quality-of-life estimates.

This study estimates 2019–2020 fatal and nonfatal firearm injury costs from gunshot wounds in the U.S., using the most recent data available and an incidence-based approach. The analysis is extended to measure the value of reduced quality of life for firearm injuries from gunshot wounds. The results provide current estimates of the economic burden of fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries from gunshot wounds in the U.S. The expanded valuation methods used provide the most recent economic accounting for medical and value of life estimates to date of the impact of firearm injuries.3134

Methods

Counts of nonfatal firearm injuries from gunshot wounds (henceforth, firearm injuries) were obtained from the 2019–2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database, the most recent data available. HCUP NEDS is the largest all-payer emergency department claims-based database and provides a nationally representative sample. Firearm injuries were classified using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) using an established surveillance definition.35 Only initial firearm injuries due to gunshot wounds were included. Data were stratified by disposition (treated and released or admitted), and then by sex, age, hospital region, and urbanicity. Counts for nonfatal firearm injuries by race/ethnicity are not reported as the data source for nonfatal firearm injuries lacks reliable data on race/ethnicity. Weighted counts are reported. Data on intents (self-harm, assault, and unintentional) were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – Firearm Injury Surveillance System (NEISS-FISS), which assigns intent based on a narrative review of the health record. To determine the percentage of firearm injuries attributable to each intent, weighted NEISS-FISS counts for each intent were aggregated over 3 years (2017–2019; 2018–2020) and divided by the total number of weighted firearm injuries. The percentage for each intent was multiplied by the overall count from NEDS for 2019–2020 and reported as the number of firearm injuries per intent.

One-year medical costs per case were obtained from Peterson et al.33 and reported by disposition and intent. One-year quality adjusted life year (QALY) losses per case were obtained from Miller et al.34 and reported by disposition and intent. One-year work loss estimates were obtained from Peterson et al.32 and reported by disposition. Medical costs, QALY losses, and work loss were summed to obtain an overall 1-year cost estimate by disposition and intent. The overall cost was then multiplied by the counts. Treated and released and admitted were summed to obtain an overall nonfatal cost estimate.

The number of people who died with firearm listed as an underlying cause of death was obtained from 2019–2020 multiple cause-of-death mortality data from the restricted-use National Vital Statistics System (NVSS). Firearm-related deaths were identified through International Classification of Diseases Codes, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Classification was conducted by mechanism and intent of injury according to the external cause of injury framework.35 Data were stratified by sex, age, region, urbanicity, and race/ethnicity.

The median estimate for the value of a statistical life (VSL) was assigned to each death according to the age of the descendent,36, 37 this methodology has been used in previous literature to assign value to life lost.3840 Medical costs associated with the fatality were assigned by location of the fatality.

As a sensitivity analysis, fatal costs are reported using the high estimate and low estimate for the VSL assigned according to age.36, 37

All estimates are reported in 2020 dollars. Analyses were conducted in 2023. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.

Results

The total cost of firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. for 2020 was $493.2 billion.

In 2019 there were an estimated 82,498 nonfatal firearm injuries and in 2020 there were an estimated 99,801 nonfatal firearm injuries (Table 1). In both 2019 and 2020, 55% of those injuries were treated and released (Appendix Table 1). Of these 78% were assaults in 2019–2020, 17% in 2019 and 18% in 2020 were unintentional injuries, and 4% in 2019 and 3% in 2020 were self-harm. The remaining injuries were unknown and legal intervention, comprising 0.9%. In 2019–2020 most nonfatal firearm injuries occurred in males, the South, and urban areas. Those aged 25–44 years comprised the largest proportion of nonfatal firearm injuries by age group, in 2019–2020. On average, a nonfatal firearm injury that was treated and released resulted in a cost of $29,234, while a hospitalized injury was $170,030. QALY losses accounted for a mean cost of $19,220 for an individual who was treated and released and $91,337 for an individual who was hospitalized (data not shown).

Table 1:

Estimated Counts of Nonfatal Firearma Injuries by Intent, 2019 and 2020

Allb Assault Self-harm Unintentional
Number Number Number Number
Demographics 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Total 82,498 99,801 64,266 78,044 2,970 3,293 14,437 17,565
Sexc
 Male 71,266 85,705 55,516 67,021 2,566 2,828 12,472 15,084
 Female 11,138 14,038 8,677 10,978 -- -- 1,949 2,471
Age group (years)d
 0–9 -- 1,276 -- -- -- -- -- --
 10–24 30,985 37,616 24,137 29,416 -- 1,241 5,422 6,620
 25–44 37,364 45,804 29,107 35,819 1,345 1,512 6,539 8,062
 45–64 10,705 11,783 8,339 9,214 -- -- 1,873 2,074
 65+ 2,821 3,313 2,198 2,591 -- -- -- --
Region
 Northeast 5,288 8,701 4,119 6,804 -- -- -- 1,531
 Midwest 18,659 22,317 14,535 17,452 -- -- 3,265 3,928
 South 46,502 48,180 36,225 37,677 1,674 1,590 8,138 8,480
 West 12,049 20,603 9,386 16,112 -- -- 2,109 3,626
Urbanicitye
 Urban 68,660 83,996 53,486 65,685 2,472 2,772 12,016 14,783
 Rural 12,947 14,231 10,086 11,129 -- -- 2,266 2,505

Source: Counts of nonfatal firearm injuries were obtained from the 2019 and 2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database. Data on intents (self-harm, assault, and unintentional) were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – Firearm Injury Surveillance System (NEISS-FISS) 2017–2019 and 2018–2020, and the proportions were applied to the counts of nonfatal HCUP data.

Note: -- indicates suppressed value where the weighted count is <1,200

a

ICD-10-CM codes used were: W32, W33, W34.00, W34.09, W34.10, W34.19, X72, X73, X74.8, X74.9, X93, X94, X95.8, X95.9, Y22, Y23, Y24.8, Y24.9, Y35.00-Y35.03, Y35.09, Y36.42, Y36.43, Y36.92, Y37.42, Y37.43, Y37.92, Y38.4; Seventh digit ‘A’ or missing.

b

Includes Assault, Self-harm, Unintentional, Undetermined, and Legal Intervention

c

94 injuries were missing sex

d

4 injuries were missing age

e

891 injuries were missing urbanicity

In 2019, the cost of all nonfatal firearm injuries was $7.58 billion dollars, with $6.24 billion occurring among those who were hospitalized (Table 2 and Appendix Table 4). Assaults accounted for $7.23 billion, with $5.9 billion for those who were hospitalized. Self-harm accounted for approximately $0.59 billion. In 2020, the cost of all nonfatal firearm injuries was $9.3 billion dollars, with $7.7 billion occurring among those who were hospitalized (Table 2 and Appendix Table 4). Assaults accounted for $8.89 billion, with $7.29 billion for those who were hospitalized. Self-harm accounted for approximately $0.67 billion. Among nonfatal injuries QALY loss exceeded the medical cost and work loss for both treated and released and hospitalized cases (Data not shown).

Table 2:

Estimated Cost of Nonfatal Firearma Injuries by Intent in Billions, 2019 and 2020

Allb Assault Self-harm Unintentional
Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($)
Demographics 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Total $7.58 $9.30 $7.23 $8.89 $0.59 $0.67 $1.14 $1.40
Sex
 Male $6.58 $8.09 $6.27 $7.73 $0.52 $0.59 $0.99 $1.22
 Female $0.99 $1.20 $0.95 $1.15 -- -- $0.15 $0.18
Age group (years)
 0–9 -- $0.13 -- -- -- -- -- --
 10–24 $2.76 $3.47 $2.63 $3.32 -- $0.25 $0.42 $0.52
 25–44 $3.48 $4.31 $3.31 $4.12 $0.27 $0.31 $0.52 $0.65
 45–64 $1.01 $1.09 $0.97 $1.05 -- -- $0.15 $0.16
 65+ $0.27 $0.29 $0.26 $0.28 -- -- -- --
Region
 Northeast $0.48 $0.86 $0.46 $0.82 -- -- -- $0.13
 Midwest $1.71 $1.94 $1.63 $1.86 -- -- $0.26 $0.29
 South $4.22 $4.49 $4.03 $4.30 $0.33 $0.33 $0.64 $0.68
 West $1.17 $2.01 $1.11 $1.92 -- -- $0.17 $0.30
Urbanicity
 Urban $6.27 $7.79 $5.98 $7.45 $0.49 $0.56 $0.94 $1.17
 Rural $1.21 $1.33 $1.15 $1.27 -- -- $0.18 $0.20

Source: Counts of nonfatal firearm injuries were obtained from the 2019 and 2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database. Data on intents (self-harm, assault, and unintentional) were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – Firearm Injury Surveillance System (NEISS-FISS) 2017–2019 and 2018–2020, and the proportions were applied to the counts of nonfatal HCUP data.

Note: In 2020 U.S. Dollars; -- indicates suppressed value where the weighted count is <1,200

a

ICD-10-CM codes used were: W32, W33, W34.00, W34.09, W34.10, W34.19, X72, X73, X74.8, X74.9, X93, X94, X95.8, X95.9, Y22, Y23, Y24.8, Y24.9, Y35.00-Y35.03, Y35.09, Y36.42, Y36.43, Y36.92, Y37.42, Y37.43, Y37.92, Y38.4

b

Includes Assault, Self-harm, Unintentional, Undetermined, and Legal Intervention

In 2019, there were 39,707 fatal firearm injuries and there were 45,222 fatal firearm injuries in 2020 (Table 3). From 2019 to 2020, there was a 13.9% increase in overall fatal firearm injuries which translated to a 15.5% increase in the estimate of fatal firearm injury costs. For both years, most firearm injuries were suicides (60.3% in 2019 and 53.7% in 2020), followed by homicide (36.3% in 2019 and 42.9% in 2020), whereas a small percentage were unintentional (1.2% in 2019–2020) or undetermined (0.9% in 2019–2020). The largest increase from 2019 to 2020 occurred in homicides (34.5%), corresponding to a 35.1% increase in the estimate of homicide costs.

Table 3:

Counts of Fatal Firearma Injuries by Intent, 2019 and 2020

Allb Homicide Suicide Unintentional Undetermined
Demographics 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Total 39,707 45,222 14,414 19,384 23,941 24,292 486 535 346 400
Sex
 Male 34,041 38,981 12,127 16,428 20,725 21,180 436 474 257 312
 Female 5,666 6,241 2,287 2,956 3,216 3,112 50 61 89 88
Age group (years)c
 0–9 168 257 125 176 0d 0d 35 63 8 d 18 d
 10–24 7,779 9,940 4,483 6,184 2,972 3,397 144 159 110 125
 25–44 14,394 17,480 7,158 9,698 6,694 7,116 131 157 113 143
 45–64 10,398 10,409 2,183 2,775 7,882 7,307 114 101 82 79
 65+ 6,965 7,135 464 550 6,392 6,472 62 55 32 35
Region
 Northeast 3,584 4,145 1,277 1,883 2,220 2,154 29 38 19d 19d
 Midwest 8,552 10,040 3,170 4,568 5,145 5,194 92 110 69 92
 South 19,043 21,552 7,579 9,772 10,797 11,064 279 298 190 196
 West 8,528 9,485 2,388 3,161 5,779 5,880 86 89 68 93
Urbanicity
 Urban 32,478 37,391 12,774 17,288 18,672 18,902 329 378 275 311
 Rural 7,229 7,831 1,640 2,096 5,269 5,390 157 157 71 89
Race/Ethnicitye
 Hispanic 4,058 5,003 2,301 2,947 1,534 1,790 60 62 46 70
 American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic 640 627 228 227 381 374 9d 7d 1d 9d
 Asian or Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic 385 522 172 221 183 267 7d 12d 3d 5d
 Black or African American, non-Hispanic 10,395 14,119 8,499 11,922 1,588 1,852 116 134 77 100
 White, non-Hispanic 24,151 24,870 3,193 4,052 20,202 19,962 294 320 218 215

Source: Counts were obtained from the multiple cause-of-death mortality data 2019 and 2020 from the restricted-use National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).

a

ICD-10 codes used were: W32-W34, X72-X74, X93-X95, Y22-Y24, Y35.0, *U01.4

b

Includes Assault, Self-harm, Unintentional, Undetermined, and Legal Intervention

c

3 observations with missing age in 2019 and 1 observation with missing age in 2020

d

indicates an unstable value (<20 deaths)

e

78 observations in 2019 and 81 in 2020 with missing race/ethnicity

Significant disparities exist in firearm deaths by race/ethnicity, sex, and age in 2019–2020. For firearm homicides, the number of deaths among non-Hispanic Black people exceeds that for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White people (Table 3). For firearm suicides, the number of deaths for Non-Hispanic White people exceeds that for other race/ethnic groups. For both firearm homicide and suicide, deaths among males exceed those for females. For firearm homicide, deaths predominate among those aged 10–44 years, while for firearm suicide, numbers are greatest among those aged 25 to 65 years and older.

The cost of all fatal firearm injuries was $418.8 billion in 2019 and $483.9 billion in 2020 (Table 4). In 2019, suicide accounted for $235.3 billion ($238.7 billion in 2020), homicide accounted for $168.0 billion ($227.0 billion in 2020), unintentional firearm deaths accounted for $5.7 billion ($6.6 billion in 2020), and firearm deaths of undetermined intent accounted for $4.0 billion ($4.8 billion in 2020). The age group with the highest total costs was 25–44 years. The racial/ethnic group with the highest total costs was non-Hispanic white people ($237.6 billion in 2019 and $245.7 billion in 2020), followed by non-Hispanic Black people ($121.6 billion in 2019 and $165.8 billion in 2020). These costs varied substantially by the type of firearm fatality. For firearm homicide, the highest costs were borne by non-Hispanic Black people in 2019–2020. While for firearm suicide, the highest costs were borne by non-Hispanic White people.

Table 4:

Estimated Costs of Fatal Firearma Injuries by Intent in Billions, 2019 and 2020

Allb Homicide Suicide Unintentional Undetermined
Demographics 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Total $418.88 $483.90 $167.99 $227.03 $235.27 $238.67 $5.71 $6.57 $4.02 $4.75
Sex
 Male $356.98 $415.14 $142.05 $193.16 $201.24 $205.80 $5.10 $5.81 $2.97 $3.76
 Female $61.91 $68.76 $25.94 $33.87 $34.03 $32.87 $0.60 $0.76 $1.05 $1.00
Age group (years)c
 0–9 $3.03 $4.63 $2.25 $3.17 $0.00d $0.00d $0.63 $1.14 $0.14d $0.32d
 10–24 $99.07 $126.76 $56.52 $78.48 $38.24 $43.51 $1.99 $2.20 $1.47 $1.69
 25–44 $164.19 $199.39 $81.66 $110.64 $76.34 $81.16 $1.50 $1.79 $1.29 $1.63
 45–64 $118.58 $118.71 $24.90 $31.66 $89.88 $83.32 $1.30 $1.15 $0.94 $0.90
 65+ $34.02 $34.41 $2.66 $3.08 $30.81 $30.69 $0.29 $0.30 $0.18 $0.21
Region
 Northeast $37.13 $43.70 $14.80 $22.04 $21.36 $20.44 $0.30 $0.42 $0.22d $0.21d
 Midwest $91.47 $108.59 $37.44 $53.83 $51.20 $51.43 $1.14 $1.36 $0.83 $1.12
 South $202.51 $232.72 $88.13 $114.35 $106.72 $109.81 $3.28 $3.71 $2.17 $2.36
 West $87.77 $98.89 $27.63 $36.81 $55.98 $56.99 $1.00 $1.08 $0.81 $1.07
Urbanicity
 Urban $345.44 $403.83 $149.12 $202.94 $184.26 $186.70 $3.99 $4.73 $3.22 $3.71
 Rural $73.44 $80.06 $18.88 $24.09 $51.01 $51.97 $1.72 $1.85 $0.81 $1.05
Race/Ethnicitye
 Hispanic $47.28 $58.48 $27.34 $35.18 $17.25 $20.10 $0.76 $0.81 $0.57 $0.86
 American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic $7.27 $7.08 $2.65 $2.61 $4.25 $4.16 $0.12d $0.09d $0.02d $0.11d
 Asian or Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic $4.44 $6.01 $1.99 $2.59 $2.11 $3.01 $0.07d $0.15d $0.04d $0.06d
 Black or African American, non-Hispanic $121.58 $165.75 $100.10 $140.48 $17.65 $20.73 $1.52 $1.78 $1.00 $1.28
 White, non-Hispanic $237.56 $245.72 $35.68 $45.80 $193.53 $190.20 $3.23 $3.74 $2.39 $2.44

Source: Counts were obtained from the multiple cause-of-death mortality data 2019 and 2020 from the restricted-use National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).

Note: In 2020 U.S. Dollars;

a

ICD-10 codes used were: W32-W34, X72-X74, X93-X95, Y22-Y24, Y35.0, *U01.4

b

Includes Assault, Self-harm, Unintentional, Undetermined, and Legal Intervention

c

3 deaths in 2019 and 1 death in 2020 were missing age and are not assigned costs

d

indicates an unstable value (<20 deaths)

e

78 deaths in 2019 and 81 in 2020 were missing race/ethnicity and are assigned costs in the total cost category

When examining the cost burden by age group, race/ethnicity, and intent, it is young non-Hispanic Black people who bear a disproportionate share of the burden of firearm homicide costs. Firearm homicides among non-Hispanic Black people ages 10–44 years account for an estimated 54.1% of the costs of all homicides and 25.4% of the costs of all firearm deaths (Appendix Table 1).

The mean VSL per fatality was $10.7 million and the mean medical cost associated with a firearm fatality was $6,409 in 2020 (data not shown). Using both the low and high estimates as alternatives to the median estimate for VSL assigned according to age, the cost of all fatal firearm injuries was between $206.26 billion and $620.87 billion in 2019 and between $240.17 and $715.51 in 2020 (Appendix Table 5 and 6).

Discussion

In 2020, the combined lifetime costs for firearm-related deaths and annual costs of nonfatal firearm injuries were $493.2 billion. Firearm injuries in males, young and middle-aged adults have higher costs. The urban areas and the Southern region of the U.S. have higher costs than rural areas and the Northeast, Midwest, and West regions. The South has the highest age adjusted rate of firearm deaths with 17.0 per 100,000 in 2020 compared to 14.8 in the Midwest, 11.7 in the West and 7.3 in the Northeast.41 Across all demographic and geographic categories, the majority of nonfatal costs are attributed to hospitalization, while the fatal costs are largely attributable to the VSL lost. The cost of fatal firearm injuries vastly outweighs the cost of nonfatal firearm injuries.

These findings are in line with the increase in overall fatal firearm injuries that has been documented by Kegler et al., 2022.42 That study found that in 2020 firearm homicides increased by 35% from 2019.42 The reasons for the increases in firearm deaths in 2020 are not yet well understood. However, the overall increase in firearm deaths in 2020 occurred among the backdrop of the global Covid-19 pandemic.4244 The pandemic was associated with disruptions in health, social, and emergency services that may have contributed to these widening disparities in firearm-related deaths and costs. In addition, other factors such as strains in law enforcement-community relations over the use of lethal force; increases in firearm purchases; and increases in intimate partner violence have also been described as potential explanations for the increase.4548

These findings concur with recent research showing that assaults comprise the bulk of the nonfatal firearm injuries and costs.49 Most current cost studies utilize NEDS and National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to determine the economic burden, however, these data sources underestimate assaults and overestimate unintentional firearm injuries.15, 4951 Hospital billing using the ICD-10-CM system has tended to skew towards classifying injuries as accidents. The nonfatal intent data from NEISS-FISS have been found to provide a more accurate estimation of the distribution of nonfatal firearm injuries, with approximately 79% resulting from assault/legal intervention.52 A previous study used NEISS-FISS to assign intent to HCUP cases using multiple imputation, demonstrating the usefulness of the NEISS data for intent.53 The current study looks to address this issue by using HCUP for case counts, but applying the intents based on NEISS-FISS.

Prior estimates of the cost of firearm injuries have been limited in several ways. First, previous cost estimates utilized data sources, such as the HCUP NEDS or NIS, that, as noted, use ICD-10-CM coding that provides an inaccurate distribution of nonfatal firearm injuries by intent and, therefore, complicates the interpretation of cost estimates.15, 49, 52, 54, 55 In addition, prior studies sometimes include medical costs but fail to include any VSL lost or QALY lost. As is demonstrated in this study, the bulk of the cost associated with firearm injuries does not come from the medical costs, but rather from lost VSL and reduced quality of life. Recent estimates of the cost of firearm injuries use data from 2010–2011 to estimate medical cost, using the previous version of the CDC Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System injury cost tool.56

These findings not only highlight the racial/ethnic differences in firearm injuries, but they also document the disproportionate cost burden. The consistent and pervasive racial/ethnic disparities in homicide reported here and elsewhere may be the result of multiple factors.42, 57 Historical systemic inequities in American life and structural racism have resulted in severely restricted economic, housing, and educational opportunities for disadvantaged racial/ethnic groups and are associated with unequal risk for violence.58 Urban areas and the southern region of the U.S., have higher proportionate concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities residents and rates of firearm homicide and poverty have remained persistently high.57 Non-Hispanic White men have consistently had the highest rates of firearm suicide in the U.S..2 Factors associated with high firearm suicide rates in this population include living in rural areas 59 where options for mental and behavioral healthcare services are more limited and economic pressures, substance misuse, and access to firearms are highly prevalent.6062

Reviews of the evidence suggest several strategies that can potentially impact firearm-related outcomes or important risk and protective factors for firearm-related injury and death. 61, 6367 These include intervention and preventive measures such as the following:

  • Strategies to reduce access to lethal means among persons at risk of harming themselves or others.68 Research suggests that waiting periods, and policies limiting access to firearms by persons under a restraining order for intimate partner violence are associated with reductions in some types of firearm injuries.67, 69, 70

  • There is evidence that strengthening economic supports, access to and delivery of care, and teaching coping and problem-solving skills can reduce the risk of suicide. 61, 66

  • Reviews of the evidence suggest that street outreach approaches, hospital-based programs, place-based interventions and creating green spaces can reduce the risk for firearm deaths. 64, 7174

  • Policies that address structural conditions and inequities in risk by strengthening household financial security through tax credits, childcare subsidies, temporary assistance to families, livable wages and improving access to high-quality early childhood education have demonstrated positive effects on important risk factors for firearm homicide.7580

  • Other measures—including parent/family-based approaches, mentoring, after-school programs, and universal school-based programs that teach life skills to build positive and nurturing relationships, environments, and opportunities are associated with reductions in youth violence, crime, and youth suicide.64, 66, 81

Limitations

This study is subject to several limitations. First, the classification of fatalities by intent may be over or underestimated due to anomalies in death certificate coding.55, 82, 83 Unintentional firearm deaths, in particular, may be misclassified and underreported as some studies have noted.50, 55, 84 However, unintentional firearm deaths accounted for less than two percent of all firearm fatalities in 2020 and so the impact of this problem on the overall classification of firearm fatalities by intent is negligible. Second, the estimated costs for nonfatal injuries are likely underestimates as they do not include categories such as travel costs to follow-up appointments and time lost by family members who may be caregivers, items which likely burden disadvantaged racial/ethnic populations more than other populations. Additionally, these estimates do not include costs of treating disabilities due to the firearm injury, such as spinal cord injuries which may lead to paralysis, nor do they include other types of cost associated with the disabilities, such as transportation, medical equipment, specialized therapy, and caregiving. Furthermore, the nonfatal injuries have a one-year time horizon, and many firearm injuries may have medical costs and decreases in QALYs that extend beyond a year such as those that lead to permanent disabilities. Therefore, the estimates of the nonfatal firearm costs are conservative. Criminal justice costs are not included as the criminal justice costs of firearm injuries cannot be separated from the total cost of firearm-related crimes.85 Person-level intangible costs (e.g., pain and suffering) and societal-level costs (e.g., investments in infrastructure and safety systems) attributable to firearm injuries are similarly not included. Due to these omissions, this study cannot be considered as taking a fully societal perspective. For a nuanced discussion of the overall burden of firearms and the social cost of the criminal misuse of guns, see Cook (2020).86 This study takes a societal perspective within the categories of costs and timeframes that are included. Finally, not all individual cost estimates are specific to firearms, such as nursing care costs, which may result in an under or overestimate due to the imprecision of individual cost components.

Conclusions

The findings of this study underscore the importance of prevention to save lives and reduce the pain and suffering victims of firearm injuries and their families experience as well as the substantial value lost to society and reduced quality of life from firearm-related injuries and deaths. Addressing the public health issues of firearm-related injury and death can ameliorate the costs to our society of rising rates of firearm injuries. This includes protecting young lives by ensuring a strong start, creating the conditions where all can thrive, and providing the skills, opportunities, and supports to live a life free from firearm injury. Doing otherwise comes at a high cost to the Nation.

Supplementary Material

Appendix

Footnotes

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

No financial disclosures have been reported by the authors of this paper.

References

  • 1.Rudoloph L, Caplan J, Ben-Moshe K, Dillon L. Health in All Policies: A Guide for State and Local Governments. Washington, DC and Oakland, CA; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). 2022. [cited 2022 March]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
  • 3.Dahlberg LL, Haileyesus T. Victimization from gun violence. In: Schildkraut J, Carter GL, editors. Guns in American society: An encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law. 3rd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO Publishers; 2022. p. 885–891. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barrett JT, Lee LK, Monuteaux MC, Farrell CA, Hoffmann JA, Fleegler EW. Association of county-level poverty and inequities with firearm-related mortality in US youth. JAMA Pediatr 2022;176(2):e214822–e214822. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fowler KA, Dahlberg LL, Haileyesus T, Annest JL. Firearm injuries in the United States. Prev Med 2015;79:5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rowhani-Rahbar A, Quistberg DA, Morgan ER, Hajat A, Rivara FP. Income inequality and firearm homicide in the US: a county-level cohort study. Inj Prev 2019;25(Suppl 1):i25–i30. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-043080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DiScala C, Sege R. Outcomes in children and young adults who are hospitalized for firearms-related injuries. Pediatrics 2004;113(5):1306–1312. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lowe SR, Blachman-Forshay J, Koenen KC. Trauma as a public health issue: Epidemiology of trauma and trauma-related disorders. In: Evidence based treatments for trauma-related psychological disorders: Springer; 2015. p. 11–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lowe SR, Galea S. The mental health consequences of mass shootings. Trauma Violence Abuse 2017;18(1):62–82. doi: 10.1177/152483801559157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miller TR, Cohen MA. Costs of gunshot and cut/stab wounds in the United States, with some Canadian comparisons. Accid Anal Prev 1997;29(3):329–341. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00007-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajabali F, Turcotte K, Zheng A, Pauls N, Nguyen T, Kalman E, et al. The cost of firearm violent crime in British Columbia, Canada. Front public health 2023;10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.938091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cook PJ, Ludwig J. Gun violence: The real costs. Oxford University Press on Demand; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kalesan B, Zuo Y, Vasan RS, Galea S. Risk of 90-day readmission in patients after firearm injury hospitalization: a nationally representative retrospective cohort study. J Inj Violence Res 2019;11(1):65. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v11i1.979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee J, Quraishi SA, Bhatnagar S, Zafonte RD, Masiakos PT. The economic cost of firearm-related injuries in the United States from 2006 to 2010. Surgery 2014;155(5):894–898. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Peek-Asa C, Butcher B, Cavanaugh JE. Cost of hospitalization for firearm injuries by firearm type, intent, and payer in the United States. Inj Epidemiol 2017;4(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s40621-017-0120-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ranney ML, Herges C, Metcalfe L, Schuur JD, Hain P, Rowhani-Rahbar A. Increases in actual health care costs and claims after firearm injury. Ann Intern Med 2020;173(12):949–955. doi: 10.7326/M20-0323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rattan R, Parreco J, Namias N, Pust GD, Yeh DD, Zakrison TL. Hidden costs of hospitalization after firearm injury: national analysis of different hospital readmission. Ann Surg 2018;267(5):810–815. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kalesan B, Siracuse JJ, Cook A, Prosperi M, Fagan J, Galea S. Prevalence and hospital charges from firearm injuries treated in US emergency departments from 2006 to 2016. Surgery 2021;169(5):1188–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spitzer SA, Vail D, Tennakoon L, Rajasingh C, Spain DA, Weiser TG. Readmission risk and costs of firearm injuries in the United States, 2010–2015. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0209896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bongiorno DM, Badolato GM, Boyle M, Vernick JS, Levy JF, Goyal MK. United States trends in healthcare charges for pediatric firearm injuries. Am J Emerg Med 2021;47:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Evans PT, Pennings JS, Samade R, Lovvorn III HN, Martus JE. The financial burden of musculoskeletal firearm injuries in children with and without concomitant intra-cavitary injuries. J Pediatr Surg 2020;55(9):1754–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fraser Doh K, Sheline E, Wetzel M, Simon HK, Morris CR. Comparison of cost and resource utilization between firearm injuries and motor vehicle collisions at pediatric hospitals. Acad Emerg Med 2021;28(6):630–638. doi: 10.1111/acem.14234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gani F, Canner JK. Trends in the incidence of and charges associated with firearm-related injuries among pediatric patients, 2006–2014. JAMA Pediatr 2018;172(12):1195–1196. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kamat PP, Santore MT, Hoops KE, Wetzel M, McCracken C, Sullivan D, et al. Critical care resource use, cost, and mortality associated with firearm-related injuries in US children’s hospitals. J Pediatr Surg 2020;55(11):2475–2479. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Lopreiato MC, Lavery DF, Passannante MR. Unrelenting violence: an analysis of 6,322 gunshot wound patients at a Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76(1):2–11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab19e7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Phillips R, Shahi N, Bensard D, Meier M, Shirek G, Goldsmith A, et al. Guns, scalpels, and sutures: the cost of gunshot wounds in children and adolescents. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020;89(3):558–564. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Quiroz HJ, Casey LC, Parreco JP, Willobee BA, Rattan R, Lasko DS, et al. Human and economic costs of pediatric firearm injury. J Pediatr Surg 2020;55(5):944–949. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sidhu S, Mandelbaum A, Dobaria V, Williamson CG, Tran Z, Sullins V, et al. National trends in the cost burden of pediatric gunshot wounds across the United States. J Pediatr 2021;236:172–178. e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taylor JS, Madhavan S, Han RW, Chandler JM, Tenakoon L, Chao S. Financial burden of pediatric firearm-related injury admissions in the United States. PLoS one 2021;16(6):e0252821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wolf AE, Garrison MM, Mills B, Chan T, Rowhani-Rahbar A. Evaluation of injury severity and resource utilization in pediatric firearm and sharp force injuries. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2(10):e1912850–e1912850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peterson C, Miller GF, Barnett SBL, Florence C. Economic cost of injury—United States, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70(48):1655. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7048a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Peterson C, Xu L, Barnett SBL. Average lost work productivity due to non-fatal injuries by type in the USA. Inj Prev 2021;27(2):111–117. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peterson C, Xu L, Florence C. Average medical cost of fatal and non-fatal injuries by type in the USA. Inj Prev 2021;27(1):24–33. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miller G, Barnett SB, Peterson C, Florence C, Lawrence B, Miller T. Monetized Estimated Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) Losses for Non-fatal Injuries. Inj Prev 2022;28(5):405–409. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hedegaard H, Johnson RL, Garnett M, Thomas KE. The International classification of diseases, 10th revision, clinical modification (ICD–10–CM): external cause-of-injury framework for categorizing mechanism and intent of injury. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Guidelines for regulatory impact analysis. In. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Guidelines for Regulatory Impact Analysis, Appendix D: Updating Value per Statistical Life (VSL) Estimates for Inflation and Changes in Real Income. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anderson DA. The aggregate cost of crime in the United States. The Journal of Law and Economics 2021;64(4):857–885. doi: 10.1086/715713 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Viscusi WK, Blasinsky KJ. Leveraging Public Support for Gun Laws to Reduce Mass Shootings. University of Illinois Law Review 2024;2023(3):23–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Viscusi WK. Extending the Domain of the Value of a Statistical Life. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 2021;12(1):1–23. doi: 10.1017/bca.2020.19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System, Mortality 1999–2020 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released in 2021. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999–2020, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. [cited 2023 July 15]; Available from: http://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10.html
  • 42.Kegler SR, Simon TR, Zwald ML, Chen MS, Mercy JA, Jones CM, et al. Vital Signs: Changes in Firearm Homicide and Suicide Rates—United States, 2019–2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71(19):656. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7119e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bibbins-Domingo K This time must be different: disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: American College of Physicians; 2020. p. 233–234. doi: 10.7326/M20-2247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shiels MS, Haque AT, Haozous EA, Albert PS, Almeida JS, García-Closas M, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic, March to December 2020. Ann Intern Med 2021;174(12):1693–1699. doi: 10.7326/M21-2134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rosenfeld R, Abt T, Lopez E. Pandemic, Social Unrest, and Crime in U.S. Cities: 2020 Year-End Update. Washington, D.C.; 2021. January. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Piquero AR, Jennings WG, Jemison E, Kaukinen C, Knaul FM. Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic-Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crim Justice 2021;74:101806. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reger MA, Stanley IH, Joiner TE. Suicide mortality and coronavirus disease 2019—a perfect storm? JAMA Psychiatry 2020;77(11):1093–1094. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ssentongo P, Fronterre C, Ssentongo AE, Advani S, Heilbrunn ES, Hazelton JP, et al. Gun violence incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic is higher than before the pandemic in the United States. Scientific Reports 2021;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98813-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barry LE, Crealey GE, Nguyen NT, Weiser TG, Spitzer SA, O’Neill C. Hospital costs and fatality rates of traumatic assaults by mechanism in the US, 2016–2018. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5(6):e2218496–e2218496. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miller M, Azrael D, Yenduri R, Barber C, Bowen A, MacPhaul E, et al. Assessment of the accuracy of firearm injury intent coding at 3 US hospitals. JAMA Network Open 2022;5(12):e2246429–e2246429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schnippel K, Burd-Sharps S, Miller TR, Lawrence BA, Swedler DI. Nonfatal firearm injuries by intent in the United States: 2016–2018 hospital discharge records from the healthcare cost and utilization project. Western journal of emergency medicine 2021;22(3):462. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.51925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Barber C, Goralnick E, Miller M. The problem with ICD-coded firearm injuries. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181(8):1132–1133. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Carpenito T, Miller M, Manjourides J, Azrael D. Using multiple imputation by super learning to assign intent to nonfatal firearm injuries. Preventive medicine 2022;163:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Spitzer SA, Staudenmayer KL, Tennakoon L, Spain DA, Weiser TG. Costs and financial burden of initial hospitalizations for firearm injuries in the United States, 2006–2014. Am J Public Health 2017;107(5):770–774. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Barber C, Hemenway D. Too many or too few unintentional firearm deaths in official US mortality data? Accid Anal Prev 2011;43(3):724–731. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.The Economic Cost of Gun Violence. 2022; Available from: https://everytownresearch.org/report/the-economic-cost-of-gun-violence/#the-breakdown-557-billion-in-gun-violence-costs
  • 57.Kegler SR, Dahlberg LL, Vivolo-Kantor AM. A descriptive exploration of the geographic and sociodemographic concentration of firearm homicide in the United States, 2004–2018. Prev Med 2021;153:106767. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. The Lancet 2017;389(10077):1453–1463. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cromartie J, Vilorio D. Rural population trends. Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America 2019;2019(1490-2020-697). doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.302681 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Olfson M, Cosgrove CM, Wall MM, Blanco C. Sociodemographic factors associated with high risk for firearm suicide among US adults. JAMA internal medicine 2020;180(7):1014–1019. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.CDC. Suicide Prevention Resource for Action: A Compilation of the Best Available Evidence. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mohatt NV, Kreisel CJ, Hoffberg AS, Beehler SJ. A systematic review of factors impacting suicide risk among rural adults in the United States. J Rural Health 2021;37(3):565–575. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dahlberg L, Butchart A, Mercy J, Simon T. Firearm Injuries and Public Health. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health,; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.David-Ferdon C, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Dahlberg LL, Marshall KJ, Rainford N, Hall JE. A comprehensive technical package for the prevention of youth violence and associated risk behaviors. Atlanta, GA, USA,: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Santaella-Tenorio J, Cerdá M, Villaveces A, Galea S. What do we know about the association between firearm legislation and firearm-related injuries? Epidemiol Rev 2016;38(1):140–157. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxv012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stone DM, Holland KM, Bartholow BN, Crosby AE, Davis SP, Wilkins N. Preventing suicide: A technical package of policies, programs, and practice. Atlanta, GA, USA,: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Smart R, Morral AR, Smucker S, Cherney S, Schell TL, Peterson S, et al. The science of gun policy: A critical synthesis of research evidence on the effects of gun policies in the United States. 2nd ed: RAND corporation; 2020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rowhani-Rahbar A, Simonetti JA, Rivara FP. Effectiveness of interventions to promote safe firearm storage. Epidemiol Rev 2016;38(1):111–124. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxv006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Grossman DC, Mueller BA, Riedy C, Dowd MD, Villaveces A, Prodzinski J, et al. Gun storage practices and risk of youth suicide and unintentional firearm injuries. JAMA 2005;293(6):707–714. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.6.707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zeoli AM, McCourt A, Buggs S, Frattaroli S, Lilley D, Webster DW. Analysis of the strength of legal firearms restrictions for perpetrators of domestic violence and their associations with intimate partner homicide. Am J Epidemiol 2018;187(11):2491. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Branas CC, Kondo MC, Murphy SM, South EC, Polsky D, MacDonald JM. Urban blight remediation as a cost-beneficial solution to firearm violence. AJPH 2016;106(12):2158–2164. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Butts JA, Roman CG, Bostwick L, Porter JR. Cure violence: a public health model to reduce gun violence. Annu Rev Public Health 2015;36:39–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Maguire ER, Oakley MT, Corsaro N. Evaluating cure violence in Trinidad and Tobago. Inter-American Development Bank; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Moyer R, MacDonald JM, Ridgeway G, Branas CC. Effect of remediating blighted vacant land on shootings: a citywide cluster randomized trial. AJPH 2019;109(1):140–144. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Milligan K, Stabile M. Do child tax benefits affect the well-being of children? Evidence from Canadian child benefit expansions. Am Econ J Econ Policy 2011;3(3):175–205. doi: 10.1257/pol.3.3.175 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Love JM, Kisker EE, Ross C, Raikes H, Constantine J, Boller K, et al. The effectiveness of early head start for 3-year-old children and their parents: lessons for policy and programs. Dev Psychol 2005;41(6):885. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Marr C, Huang C-C, Sherman A, Debot B. EITC and Child Tax Credit promote work, reduce poverty, and support children’s development, research finds. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Reynolds AJ, Temple JA, Robertson DL, Mann EA. Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. JAMA 2001;285(18):2339–2346. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Reynolds AJ, Temple JA, Ou S-R, Robertson DL, Mersky JP, Topitzes JW, et al. Effects of a school-based, early childhood intervention on adult health and well-being: A 19-year follow-up of low-income families. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161(8):730–739. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.8.730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Reynolds AJ, Temple JA, White BA, Ou SR, Robertson DL. Age 26 cost–benefit analysis of the child‐parent center early education program. Child Dev 2011;82(1):379–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01563.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Leveraging the Best Available Evidence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cheng X, Wu Y, Yao J, Schwebel DC, Hu G. Mortality from unspecified unintentional injury among individuals aged 65 years and older by US state, 1999–2013. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13(8):763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Arias E, Heron MP, Hakes JK. The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States: an update. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(172). 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schaechter J, Duran I, De Marchena J, Lemard G, Villar ME. Are “accidental” gun deaths as rare as they seem? A comparison of medical examiner manner of death coding with an intent-based classification approach. Pediatrics 2003;111(4):741–744. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.4.741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Miller GF, Barnett SB, Wulz AR, Luo F, Florence C. Costs attributable to criminal justice involvement in injuries: a systematic review. Inj Prev 2023;29(1):91–100. doi: 10.1136/ip-2022-044756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cook PJ. Thinking about gun violence. Criminol Public Policy 2020;19(4):1371–1393. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12519 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

RESOURCES