Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 5;28(1):e12–e21. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777450

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

ROC curves of correlations between calcium correction formulas and symptomatic hypocalcemia. ( A ) The Clase correction formula predicts the development of symptomatic hypocalcemia with a sensitivity of 65.26% and specificity of 89.91% at the cut-off value of ≤1,801 mmol/L (ROC analysis; AUC 0.751; 95% CI 0.686–0.809; P value <0.0001). ( B ) The Jain correction formula predicts the development of symptomatic hypocalcemia with a sensitivity of 65.26% and a specificity of 89.91% at a cut-off value of ≤1.847 mmol/L (ROC analysis; AUC 0.756; 95% CI 0.691–0.814; P value <0.0001). ( C ) The Payne correction formula predicts the development of symptomatic hypocalcemia with a sensitivity of 63.16% and specificity of 88.99% at a cut-off value of ≤1.8525 mmol/L (ROC analysis; AUC 0.746; 95% CI 0.680–0.804; P value <0.0001). ( D ) The Ridefelt correction formula predicts the development of symptomatic hypocalcemia with a sensitivity of 66.32% and a specificity of 88.99% at a cut-off value of ≤1.8426 mmol/L (ROC analysis; AUC 0.753; 95% CI 0.688–0.811; P value <0.0001).