Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;116(6):1864–1876. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac259

TABLE 2.

The effect of prenatal nutritional supplements on percentage adequacy of GWG and estimated total GWG at delivery1

Intervention
Outcome MMSs Small-quantity LNSs
Percentage adequacy,2 %
Studies, n 14 4
Participants, total n 45,507 6237
Participants, n by intervention/control arms 22,940/22,567 2335/3902
WMD (95% CI), fixed-effects 0.86 (0.28, 1.44) 1.51 (−0.38, 3.40)
WMD (95% CI), random-effects 0.90 (0.08, 1.71) 2.55 (−1.42, 6.52)
I2,3 % 13.3 69.5
P-heterogeneity 0.31 0.02
Total GWG, g
Studies, n 14 4
Participants, total n 45,455 6026
Participants, n by intervention/control arms 22,914/22,541 2287/3739
WMD (95% CI), fixed-effects 209 (139, 280) 152 (−71, 376)
WMD (95% CI), random-effects 186 (43, 329) 203 (−123, 529)
I2,3 % 52.5 42.2
P-heterogeneity 0.01 0.16
1

GWG, gestational weight gain; LNS, lipid-based nutrient supplement; MMS, multiple micronutrient supplement; WMD, weighted mean difference.

2

The percentage adequacy of GWG was calculated by dividing the actual GWG at the last weight measure during pregnancy by the recommended GWG according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2009 guideline, multiplied by 100.

3

I2 is a statistic index used to assess heterogeneity across trials, with thresholds of <30%, 30–60%, and >60% considered low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively.