Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 5;15:1064. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45205-2

Table 2.

Cryo-EM structures data collection, refinement and validation statistics (continued)

Name of structure A/H7N9 K289A/C489R revertant Apo-dimer with promoter A/H7N9 self-stalled termination product complex with bound CTD
PDB ID PDB ID 8POH PDB ID 8R3K
EMDB ID EMD-17792 EMD-18871
Data collection and processing
Microscope ThermoFisher Glacios ThermoFisher Glacios
Voltage (kV) 200 200
Camera Falcon IV/Selectris X Falcon IV/Selectris X
Magnification 130k 130k
Nominal defocus range (μm) −0.8/−2.0 −0.8/−2.0
Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 40 40
Number of fractions processed (no.) 24 24
Pixel size (Å) 0.907 0.878
Micrographs (no.) 5092 3509
Refinement
Particles per class (no.) 278761 29072
Map resolution (Å), 0.143 FSC 3.26 3.43
Model resolution (Å), 0.5 FSC 3.38 3.40
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −140 −55
Map versus model cross-correlation (CCmask) 0.7456 0.8472
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms 20729 14287
Protein residues 2479 1718
Nucleotide residues 38 41
Water - -
Ligands 1 Mg 2 Mg, PPi
B factors (Å2)
Protein 105.84 55.88
Nucleotide 123.86 61.19
Ligand 33.48 44.02
Water - -
R.M.S. deviations
Bond lengths (Å) 0.003 0.003
Bond angles (°) 0.562 0.507
Validation
MolProbity score 1.84 1.44
All-atom clash score 6.79 6.44
Poor rotamers (%) 2.37 0.07
Ramachandran plot
Favoured (%) 96.91 97.59
Allowed (%) 3.09 2.41
Outliers (%) 0.0 0.0