Table 4.
Post hoc tests for significant ANOVAs for digital maturity (N=219).
| Variable and category | Values, n (%) | Values, mean (SD) | Group comparison | P value | Cohen d | |
| Gender | ||||||
|
|
Men | 97 (44.3) | 3.42 (0.66) | Vs women | .01 | 0.32 |
|
|
Women | 122 (55.7) | 3.22 (0.61) | N/Aa | N/A | N/A |
| Future use | ||||||
|
|
Very unlikely | 10 (4.6) | 3.09 (0.68) | Vs rather unlikely | .99 | −0.01 |
|
|
Very unlikely | 10 (4.6) | 3.09 (0.68) | Vs neither unlikely nor likely | .99 | −0.05 |
|
|
Very unlikely | 10 (4.6) | 3.09 (0.68) | Vs rather likely | .99 | −0.24 |
|
|
Very unlikely | 10 (4.6) | 3.09 (0.68) | Vs very likely | .57 | −0.54 |
|
|
Rather unlikely | 30 (13.7) | 3.10 (0.70) | Vs neither unlikely nor likely | .99 | −0.03 |
|
|
Rather unlikely | 30 (13.7) | 3.10 (0.70) | Vs rather likely | .99 | −0.21 |
|
|
Rather unlikely | 30 (13.7) | 3.10 (0.70) | Vs very likely | .07 | −0.52 |
|
|
Neither unlikely nor likely | 15 (6.8) | 3.12 (0.54) | Vs rather likely | .99 | −0.20 |
|
|
Neither unlikely nor likely | 15 (6.8) | 3.12 (0.54) | Vs very likely | .45 | −0.20 |
|
|
Rather likely | 48 (21.9) | 3.22 (0.50) | Vs very likely | .33 | −0.37 |
|
|
Very likely | 116 (53) | 3.45 (0.66) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MAb digital affinity | ||||||
|
|
Not at all digitally savvy | 3 (1.4) | 2.72 (0.86) | Vs rather not digitally savvy | .99 | −0.49 |
|
|
Not at all digitally savvy | 3 (1.4) | 2.72 (0.86) | Vs neither not digitally savvy nor digitally savvy | .66 | −1.14 |
|
|
Not at all digitally savvy | 3 (1.4) | 2.72 (0.86) | Vs rather digitally savvy | .51 | −0.99 |
|
|
Not at all digitally savvy | 3 (1.4) | 2.72 (0.86) | Vs very digitally savvy | .09 | −1.36 |
|
|
Rather not digitally savvy | 43 (19.6) | 3.00 (0.56) | Vs neither not digitally savvy nor digitally savvy | .14 | −0.59 |
|
|
Rather not digitally savvy | 43 (19.6) | 3.00 (0.56) | Vs rather digitally savvy | .01 | −0.59 |
|
|
Rather not digitally savvy | 43 (19.6) | 3.00 (0.56) | Vs very digitally savvy | <.001 | −1.12 |
|
|
Neither not digitally savvy nor digitally savvy | 55 (25.1) | 3.31 (0.50) | Vs rather digitally savvy | 1.00 | −0.10 |
|
|
Neither not digitally savvy nor digitally savvy | 55 (25.1) | 3.31 (0.50) | Vs very digitally savvy | .10 | −0.67 |
|
|
Rather digitally savvy | 93 (42.5) | 3.37 (0.65) | Vs very digitally savvy | .20 | −0.48 |
|
|
Very digitally savvy | 25 (11.4) | 3.69 (0.70) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GPs’c level of digital affinity | ||||||
|
|
Low digital affinity | 44 (20.1) | 3.07 (0.57) | Vs moderate digital affinity | .21 | −0.33 |
|
|
Low digital affinity | 44 (20.1) | 3.07 (0.57) | Vs high digital affinity | <.001 | −0.76 |
|
|
Moderate digital affinity | 112 (51.1) | 3.26 (0.57) | Vs high digital affinity | .004 | −0.50 |
|
|
High digital affinity | 63 (28.8) | 3.57 (0.71) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Level of extraversion | ||||||
|
|
Low level of extraversion | 21 (9.6) | 3.17 (0.48) | Vs moderate level of extraversion | 1.00 | 0.00 |
|
|
Low level of extraversion | 21 (9.6) | 3.17 (0.48) | Vs high level of extraversion | .22 | −0.41 |
|
|
Moderate level of extraversion | 82 (37.4) | 3.17 (0.62) | Vs high level of extraversion | .01 | −0.41 |
|
|
High level of extraversion | 116 (53) | 3.43 (0.65) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Level of neuroticism | ||||||
|
|
Low level of neuroticism | 114 (52.1) | 3.45 (0.62) | Vs moderate level of neuroticism | .009 | 0.41 |
|
|
Low level of neuroticism | 114 (52.1) | 3.45 (0.62) | Vs high level of neuroticism | .002 | 1.00 |
|
|
Moderate level of neuroticism | 93 (42.5) | 3.20 (0.60) | Vs high level of neuroticism | .13 | 0.62 |
|
|
High level of neuroticism | 12 (5.5) | 2.82 (0.70) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
aN/A: not applicable.
bMA: medical assistant.
cGP: general practitioner.