Table 4.
Author (year) | Country | Research question/s or aims | Participant characteristics and context | Data collection methods | Data analysis approach | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allen-Biddell & Bond (2022) | UK | What are educational psychologists’ experiences and practices of working with autistic, gender-diverse children and young people? | Educational Psychologists with experience working with autistic, gender diverse CYP (n = 5) Participants focussed on direct casework involving gender diverse CYP. |
Semi-structured interviews (via Zoom) | Reflexive thematic analysis | Themes:
|
Apostolidou (2020) | Cyprus | (a) explore professionals’ experiences regarding homophobic and transphobic bullying in schools, (b) investigate their views in relation to how these issues are being addressed by the school community and, (c) examine professionals’ views concerning the aspects they consider important for combating homophobic and transphobic bullying in school. | Group 1 (n = 4): teachers (3 secondary, 1 primary) Group 2 (n = 4): 2 school psychologists, 1 school counselor, 1 primary school teacher/clinical psychologist trainee Group 3 (n = 8): 4 parents and 4 school children. |
Focus groups, discussions led by interview protocol. Discussions focussed on professional’s views and experiences related specifically to homophobic and transphobic bullying. |
Thematic analysis | Themes:
|
Beck (2018) | USA—Midwest and East Coast | What are the lived experiences of school counselor–principal teams who make concerted advocacy efforts for LGBT students? | School counselors (n = 5) Principals (n = 4) School counselor in training (n = 1) Participants must have been recognized at the national or state level for ensuring a safe and inclusive environment for LGBT students in their work. |
Three rounds of semi-structured interviews. | Moustaka’s (1994) approach to phenomenological reduction. | Themes:
|
Beck (2020) | USA—Midwest and East Coast | How do exemplary school counselors and principals make meaning of their advocacy work with LGBT students? | Four ‘exemplary’ participants; principal (n = 2) School counselor (n = 2) Participants must have been recognized at the national or state level for their commitment to ensuring a safe and inclusive environment for LGBT students. |
3 rounds of semi-structured interviews. | Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach (Larkin & Thompson, 2012) | Themes:
|
Betts (2013) | USA | 1. What do school psychologists know about LGBTQ issues and how do they deal with it in their practice? 2. How does a school psychologist evolve from tacitly knowledgeable to LGBTQ competent to LGBTQ advocacy? 3. What skills, traits, or life experiences are instrumental in shaping school psychologists in becoming a social change agent for LGBTQ youth? |
School psychologists (n = 8) Graduate professor of school psychology (n = 2) Participants were selected from previous survey data that highlighted those who were considered active advocates for LGBTQ social justice concerns. |
Semi-structured interviews | Constant comparison method (Merriam, 2009) | Themes:
|
Bowskill (2017) | UK | To explore how educational professionals can ensure better outcomes for transgender children and young people. | Transgender adults (n = 15) professionals who have worked with transgender young people (3 = Educational Psychologist, 1 = clinical psychologist, 3 = teachers, 1 = TA, 2 = youth workers). |
Intensive interviewing Theoretical sampling—allowing each interview to feed into the next |
Grounded Theory was used. | Five interlinked categories:
|
Court (2019) | Wales | 1. What constructs do EPs and TEPs within Wales hold in relation to GV? i. What level of experience do EPs and TEPs within Wales currently have in supporting CYP who express GV? ii. What role do EPs/TEPs within Wales perceive themselves holding in relation to GV? |
Trainee Educational Psychologists/Educational Psychologists (n = 7) | Semi-structured interview | Thematic analysis | Themes linked to RQ 1
Theme linked to secondary RQ i:
Themes linked to secondary RQ ii:
|
Earnshaw et al. (2020) | USA—Massachusetts | To characterize and compare the perspectives of LGBTQ students and SHPs on: (1) experiences of LGBTQ bullying, and (2) SHP responses to LGBTQ bullying. | LGBTQ youth (n = 28) School health professionals (school nurse (n = 11), school psychologist (n = 3), guidance counselor (n = 1), social worker (n = 3), health education teacher (n = 1)) |
Online, asynchronous focus groups | Rapid Qualitative Inquiry (Beebe, 2014) | Summarized experiences of LGBTQ bullying and responses to LGBTQ bullying from perspectives of young people and SHPs. |
Gavin (2021) | UK (South-East England) | What are their perceptions of: a. how they currently best support trans* young people? b. how they currently do not best support trans* young people? c. how to improve the support of trans* young people? |
Secondary school staff (n = 22) Educational Psychologists (n = 8) Key personnel working at national level (n = 2) |
Semi-structured interviews—individual interviews and focus group interviews conducted | Thematic analysis | Themes:
|
Gonzalez (2016) | USA (South Eastern) | To investigate the experiences of school counselors who have served as advocates with and on behalf of LGBT students. Examine factors that facilitate and impede school counselors’ advocacy efforts with LGBT students. |
High school counselors (n = 12) Participants were required to have acted as advocates for and with LGBT students, including 10 having had involvement in the schools Gay Straight Alliance (GSA), 10 had engaged in advocacy work with community organizations and all had advocated for LGBT students on an individual basis. |
Semi structured interviews and document review | Constant comparative analysis | Two overarching thematic categories:
|
Gonzalez (2017) | USA (South Eastern) | What are the lived experiences of high school counselors in the south- eastern U.S. who advocate for and with LGBT students? | High school counselors (n = 12) Participants must have served as advocates for and with LGBT students e.g. being involved in schools GSA. |
Semi structured interviews and document review | Constant comparative analysis. | Themes:
|
Mackie et al. (2021) | Australia | To explore the experiences of school psychologists working with transgender young people in a school counseling context. | School psychologists (n = 7) | Semi-structured interviews (via Zoom) | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) − 6 steps outlined by Smith et al. (2009) | Themes:
|
Reisner et al. (2020) | USA—Massachusetts | Sought to identify multilevel factors that inform interventions to increase SHPs’ capacity to report and respond to LGBTQ bullying. | LGBTQ youth (n = 28) School health professionals (n = 19, included 3 school psychologists) |
Online focus groups (3 with 28 youth, 2 with 19 SHPs)—online forum where participants could read and reply to questions and comments anytime during the day. | Rapid Qualitative Inquiry (Beebe, 2014) | Three overarching thematic categories describing barriers and facilitators to addressing LGBTQ student bullying—coalesced around the social ecological model:
|
Sagzan (2019) | UK (outer London) | How do Educational Psychologists perceive their role in supporting schools to improve outcomes for trans* pupils? | Educational Psychologists (n = 8) | Semi-structured interviews | Thematic analysis | Themes:
All grounded by a 6th theme:
|
Simons & Cuadrado (2019) | USA—Midwest | What has LGBTQ school counselor advocacy looked like in schools and why has it occurred or not? | Counselors, who self-identified as “advocates,” employed by high schools (n = 9) | Semi-structured interviews. Drew upon theory of planned behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 2015) to inform interview protocol. |
Coded data were restricted to the 4 TPB categories to allow calculation of the frequency and average occurrence of the narrative data. | Themes:
|
Swindle (2022) | USA—Oregon | What are the experiences of Oregon secondary educators regarding supporting LGBTQ + students? | School counselors (n = 3) Teachers (n = 3) Administrator (n = 1) Participants must have interacted with LGBTQ + students in a school setting. |
Two rounds of semi-structured interviews and member checking. | Inductive analysis | Three general factors that influenced educators’ work with LGBTQ + students:
|
Vela (2015) | USA—Southwestern (Texas) | What are the school counseling experiences of an LGBTQ high school student? What are the experiences of the school counselor while working with students of diverse sexual orientations? What are the experiences of parents of LGBTQ students with the school counselor? |
LGBTQ students (n = 4) Parents (n = 3) School counselors (n = 8) |
Individual semi-structured interviews (with 10 participants) Focus group with five school counselors |
In vivo coding methods | Themes:
|
Yannalfo (2019) | USA—Midwestern | What are school support personnel’s perceptions of their work with transgender and gender diverse students in a Midwestern urban public school district? | Social worker (n = 1) Counselor (n = 3) School psychologist (n = 3) |
Semi-structured interviews | Thematic Analysis | Themes:
|