Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2017 Aug 29;82(5):977–1008. doi: 10.1177/0003122417725865

Table 1.

Framework for Analyzing Big Data Surveillance across Institutional Contexts

Goals
Means
Ends
Types of Surveillance Institutional Field Relationship between Individual and Institution Shifts in Surveillance Practices Associated with Big Data Institutional Interventions Consequences for Inequality

Categorical Suspicion Criminal justice, intelligence Classifying individuals according to risk; potential as criminals/ terrorists 1) Discretionary to quantified risk assessment
2) Explanatory to predictive analytics
Marking, apprehension, social control Stigma, spillover into other institutions
Categorical Seduction Finance, marketing, credit Classifying individuals according to their value to companies; potential as customers 3) Query-based to alert-based systems
4)Moderate to low inclusion thresholds
5) Disparate to integrated data
Different products, perks, access to credit, opportunities, constraints Upward or downward economic mobility; reproducing current patterns
Categorical Care Medical care, public assistance Classifying individuals according to their need; potential as clients Personalized medicine, welfarist service delivery May reduce inequality except when intersects with suspicion or seduction