Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 19;27(2):108973. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108973

Table 2.

Typical electrocatalysts recently developed for homogeneous CO2ER

Types Molecular structure Main product Potential Faradic efficiency Reference
Ir-based complexes84 graphic file with name fx19.gif HCOO −1.80 V vs. (Ag/AgCl) 38% Sypaseuth et al.84
Ni-based complexes85 graphic file with name fx20.gif CO −1.77 V vs. (SHE) 34% Sheng et al.85
Pd-based complex86 graphic file with name fx21.gif CO −1.60 V vs. (Ag/AgNO3) 85% Therrien and Wolf86
Re-based complex87 graphic file with name fx22.gif CO −2.80 V vs. (Fc/Fc+) 30-55% Nganga et al.87
Co-based complex62 graphic file with name fx23.gif HCOO −2.32 V vs. (Fc/Fc+) 68% Tsubonouchi et al.62
Mn-based complex88 graphic file with name fx24.gif CO −2.24 V vs. (Fc/Fc+) 30-60% Stanbury et al.88
Ru-based complex89 graphic file with name fx25.gif CO −2.20 V vs. (Fc/Fc+) 95% Machan et al.89
Non-metal ionic liquid complex90 graphic file with name fx26.gif C2O42− −2.60 V vs. (Fc/Fc+) 39.3% Rosen et al.90

The main products, potential, and Faradic efficiency for the corresponding electrocatalyst are also listed.