Abstract
Due to its nutritional and bioactive content, tomato pomace (TP) remains among the world's richest fruits and vegetables. Tomatoes and TP (generated coproduct) are a very rich source of lycopene and other carotenoid compounds and contain an essential amount of polyphenols, policosanol, phytosterols, organic acids, dietary fibers, minerals, and vitamins. TP is a promising source of significant bioactive compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial potential. Therefore, their consumption is known to be effective in preventing certain chronic diseases. For example, lycopene prevents prostate cancer and acts as a hepatoprotector and genoprotector against mycotoxins, pesticide residues, and heavy metals. Thus, the valorization of TP as a food ingredient can be of great health, economic and environmental interest and contribute to improving nutrition and food security. During the last decades, considerable efforts have been made to valorize TP as a crucial functional ingredient in improving: (i) the nutritional and functional properties, (ii) sensory characteristics and (iii) the shelf life of many foods. The current review aims to update and summarize the knowledge on the recent food applications of TP, particularly its use as a functional ingredient to improve the functional properties and shelf life of foods.
Keywords: Antioxidant, Bioactive compounds, Health benefits, Shelf life, Sensory properties, Tomato pomace
1. Introduction
The tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is one of the most widely produced vegetables in the world. It is an essential food commodity in the human diet, and its production is constantly increasing. According to Fig. 1, world tomato production has evolved steadily since 1980.2021, approximately 189 million tons of tomatoes were produced [1]. Based on the estimated growth rate (3.22) from 1980 to 2020 (Fig. 1), world production is estimated to be around 222 million tons by 2030.
Fig. 1.
Changes in world tomato production since 1980.
Tomato is an essential source of micronutrients such as provitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, minerals as well as providing significant amounts of bioactive compounds. It is, therefore, a functional food widely consumed by people worldwide, both in raw and cooked form, or used as a raw material for processing into products such as fruit juice, puree, sauces, ketchup, paste, and tomato powder. In recent decades, its consumption has increased significantly. This rise is associated with the health benefits induced by its numerous bioactive molecules. Indeed, tomato contains major phytochemical compounds such as tetraterpenoids, polyphenols, tools, ascorbic acid, policosanol, and phytosterols, known for their preventive and curative effects against several chronic diseases. These diseases include prostate and skin cancers, obesity, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular diseases as well as bowel disorders and cognitive impairment [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]].
Approximately one-third of the total tomato production is processed yearly [3]. Tomato industrial processings generate wet waste called tomato pomace (TP). This latter comprises peel, pulp, and seeds, accounting for nearly 5–30 % (w/w) of the initial raw material [8,9]. Thus, every year, about 5.4–9.0 million tons of TP are produced by food industries worldwide [6]. Therefore, managing this waste has always been a significant concern for the food industries. Primarily, TP was disposed of in landfills, used as a cheap source of fertilizer for the soil, or used for livestock feed [9,10]. Yet, like whole tomato, the differents parts of the TP are also rich in macro and micronutrients and contain significant amounts of various bioactive molecules (Fig. 2). For example, lycopene is one of the most represented and the most active molecule in tomatoes. It is more critical in TP (especially in peels, up to 864 mg/kg) than in whole tomatoes [[11], [12], [13]]. Recently, lycopene has significantly reduced natural and chemical toxins [14,15]. Lycopene consumption decreased the harmful effects of some mycotoxins, especially Aflatoxins B1, M1, and P1, and ochratoxins [14,15]. It has also been reported that lycopene acts as a hepatoprotector and genoprotector against pesticides and heavy metals. Recent epidemiological research revealed the protective effects of bioactive tomato molecules, especially carotenoids and polyphenols, against two major chronic diseases, type 2 diabetes and obesity [7]. In addition, lycopene and other bioactive molecules from TP exhibit antimicrobial activities against a wide range of pathogens, including multi-drug-resistant microorganisms [14,15]. There is, therefore, great potential for recovering these valuable bioactive molecules from TP or its different parts. They have industrial applications in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries [3]. Various food applications of TP, including its bioactive compounds, have been widely reported in the literature. Notably, studies have been conducted on adding TP or part of its constituents as a functional ingredient to improve the physicochemical and sensory properties and extend the shelf life of foods [[16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. In this review, we have summarized the most recent developments in the food valorization of TP, especially the effect of pomace or some of its constituents on the physicochemical properties and shelf life of foods. We have also highlighted its influences on the organoleptic properties of foods.
Fig. 2.
Health benefits of the main bioactive compounds of TP.
2. Data collection methodology
An online thorough, comprehensive literature search was carried out by combining the relevant keywords, including “tomato,” “tomato pomace,” “Lycopersicon esculentum,” “nutritional composition,” “proximate composition,” “food application,” “food ingredient,” “shelf life,” “bioactive compounds,” “antioxidant properties,” “sensory properties,” “health benefits.” Regarding the search engine, Google, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Directory of Open Access Journals, Scopus, SpringerLink, Pubmed, and Wiley Online Library were independently scrutinized. In addition, articles published in both English and French were considered. The final search was performed on April 30, 2023. References were managed with Mendeley software.
3. Nutritional composition of tomato fruit
3.1. Proximate composition
Nutritionally, the compositional analysis of tomato components revealed the presence of both macronutrients and micronutrients with significant variations. Fresh tomato fruit provides protein, lipid, carbohydrate, and dietary fibers concerning macronutrients. In recently published studies, the ranges of the proximate composition of fresh tomatoes consist of 68.03–96.17 g/100 g of moisture content, 5.90–10.60 % of ash, 10.50–25.03 g/100 g of total protein, 3.62–5.39 g/100 g of lipid, 3.92–8.00 g/100 g of carbohydrates, 47.00–56.45 g/100 g of total sugar, 3.61–4.08 of pH, 0.39–0.55 % of acidity, 30.03–41.21 % of reducing sugar and 18.00–75.00 kcal/100 g of energy [5,[21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]]. Water is the most crucial constituent in fresh tomato fruit, and the quantity depends on the tomato varieties, especially the environmental conditions in which it is cultivated. This abundance of water in tomatoes renders them one of the most highly perishable products. However, the contents of tomatoes in protein, lipid, and carbohydrates suggest that they are richer in macronutrients than pepper [27]. Fresh tomatoes have an average fructose, glucose, sucrose, and total fiber content of 2.88 %, 2.45 %, 0.02 %, and 11.44 g/100 g, respectively [28]. The by-products of tomatoes are valorized for multipurpose thanks to their contents of diverse nutrients. The proximate composition of the peels is constituted of moisture, protein, carbohydrate, lipid, acidity, pH, and energy, which have ranges of values as 5.71–90.34 g/100 g, 9.93–23.25 g/100 g, 6.01–64.35 g/100 g, 4.06–16.73 g/100 g, 2.43–5.80 %, 3.59–5.98 and 200.07–344.03 kcal/100 g, respectively [3,29]. The tomato seeds also add value regarding their physicochemical composition, displaying the moisture, protein, carbohydrate, lipid, acidity, pH, and energy of 12.97–22.42 g/100 g, 12.94–16.19 g/100 g, 10.60–38.50 g/100 g, 18.32–22.62 g/100 g, 4.67–5.66 g/100 g, 5.76–6.08 and 269.96–400.59 kcal/100 g, respectively [29]. As evidenced, the peels display protein, carbohydrate, and lipid values, making them more valuable than the seeds. The TP is widely valorized for a wide range of food products. Its moisture, protein, fat, dietary fiber, and ash composition is found in 62.27–70.14 %, 16.81–23.25 g/100 g, 11.17–16.73 g/100 g, 48.62–53.97 g/100 g, and 3.33–4.02 g/100 g, respectively [30].
3.2. Mineral composition
Minerals play pivotal roles in regulating metabolic pathways, forming vital organs, maintaining bodily physiological functions, regulating pH balance, fluid balance, blood pressure, nerve transmission, muscle contraction, and energy production [28,31,32]. The mineral composition of tomato and its by-products is shown in Table 1. Studies showed that the most essential minerals in tomatoes are potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg). Other minor minerals, including iron (Fe), Zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), boron (B), and manganese (Mn), have also been reported in tomatoes Table 1. It has been found that the level of repining [33] and farming conditions [34] influence the mineral composition of tomatoes. As displayed in Table 1. TP, especially peels and seeds, are valuable sources of minerals such as K, P, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Na [3,21,33,[35], [36], [37], [38]]. Isik and Yapar [36] reported that tomato by-products like tomato seeds could reinforce tarhana in micronutrients like minerals. Likewise, Mehta and colleagues [37] revealed that incorporating TP in bread and muffin enriched these foods with minerals such as P, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Na.
Table 1.
| Mineral composition (μg/g) | Tomato fruit | Tomato peels | Tomato pulp | Tomato seeds | TP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 160–5160 | 2620.0–3430 | 1.5–4 | 10737.6 | – |
| K | 900–62920 | 10970–45830 | 23–42 | 9765.3 | 2686.9 |
| Fe | 1.81–317.58 | 15–56.2 | 16–32 | 240.9 | 29.2 |
| Zn | 1.34–40.35 | 5.30–39.02 | 17–42 | 96.8 | – |
| B | 25.84–55.64 | 25.84–48.59 | 4.5–16.5 | – | – |
| Cu | 0.39–11.39 | 2.44–11 | 1.0–5.8 | 18.8 | – |
| Mg | 64.5–2655.9 | 1356.1–2655.9 | 0.75–1.5 | 5037.1 | 281.3 |
| Ca | 70.8–6020 | 398.3–1600. | 0.60–1.25 | 1347.6 | 146.40 |
| Mn | 0.1–3.6 | 0.5–14. | 5–13 | 77.7 | |
| Na | 20.4–320 | 720–783.3 | – | – | 210.3 |
| S | 620–830 | 0.8–2.0 |
3.3. Vitamin composition
Vitamins are essential micronutrients with specific physiological functions, including enzyme cofactors, biological antioxidants, hormones, and photoreceptive cofactors in vision in the human body [39]. Tomatoes are rich in vitamins A, E, C, niacin, folate, B1, B2, B12, K, and H (Table 2), essential to human health [24,40]. Vitamin C, which is necessary for the immune system strengthening, is also found in tomato peels, pulp, seeds, and pomace. In addition, tomato seeds contain niacin and vitamin E, which TP is a rich source of vitamins B12 and C [28,41,42]. Tomato and its by-products can help alleviate many diseases due to high concentrations of vitamin C, E, and other bioactive compounds [39].
Table 2.
Vitamins composition of tomato and tomato by-products.
| Vitamin composition (mg/100 g) | Tomato fruit | Tomato peels | Tomato pulp | Tomato seeds | TP | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.004–0.010 | – | – | 28.20 | – | [24,29,[40], [41], [42],54,68,[118], [119], [120]] |
| C | 5.71–101.29 | 110.00 | 16.80–19.30 | 9.50 | 14.03 | |
| B1 | 0.216 | – | – | 1370.00–2340.00 | – | |
| B2 | 0.25 | – | – | – | – | |
| B6 | 0.47 | – | – | – | – | |
| E | 0.42–3.26 | – | – | 0.56–32.7 | – | |
| Folate | 13 | – | – | – | – | |
| B12 | 0.00004–0.00005 | – | – | – | 1110.00 | |
| Niacin | 0.98–1.11 | – | – | 0.6 | – | |
| K | 0.0013–0.00149 | – | – | – | – | |
| H | 0.00047–0.00068 | – | – | – | – |
3.4. Amino acid composition
Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins that maintain body cells, regulate muscle protein metabolism, control growth and immunity, wound healing, reduce adiposity, and repair damaged tissues [28]. The primary amino acids of tomato fruit are aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glutamine, alanine, phenylalanine, histidine, serine, cysteine, valine, threonine, and proline (Table 3). However, the amino acid content in tomatoes depends on the cultivation conditions [43,44] and maturation and ripening [45,46]. For instance, Zhu and colleagues [43] reported that the Se treatment of pink tomato with selenium increased the content of amino acids and the amounts of soluble sugars and bioactive compounds. Moreover, Sun and colleagues [44] found out that the content of amino acids was affected in tomatoes treated with L-glutamate. Tomato seeds are the richest tomato by-product in amino acids compared to peels and pomace (Table 3). The seeds are rich in glutamic acid, aspartic acid, arginine, leucine, glycine, alanine, phenylalanine, lysine, serine, and proline (Table 3). Furthermore, tomato peels and pomace are rich sources of glutamic acid, aspartic acid, arginine, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, and glycine (Table 3) [44,[47], [48], [49]]. Regarding their amino acid content, tomato by-products can reinforce foods low in amino acids, such as cereal-based foods [50].
Table 3.
Amino acid composition of tomato and tomato by-products.
| Amino acid composition | Tomato fruit | Tomato peels | Tomato seeds | Tomato pomace | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leucine | 0.24–1.41 mg/100 g f.w; 24.50–590.00 mg/100 g d.w; 26.60–134.60 nmol/g f.w | 380.00 mg/100 g d.w | 780.00 mg/100 g d.w | 1070.00 mg/100 g d.w | [44,[47], [48], [49]] |
| Valine | 0.84–2.15 mg/100 g f.w; 34.06–893.00 mg/100 g d.w; 56.00–216.00 nmol/g f.w | 320.00 mg/100 g d.w | 560.00 mg/100 g d.w | ||
| Lysine | 0.05–13.00 mg/100 g f.w; 25.58–120.00 mg/100 g d.w; 170.60–549.00 nmol/g f.w | 140.00 mg/100 g d.w | 610.00 mg/100 g d.w | 880.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Isoleucine | 0.42–1.41 mg/100 g f.w; 15.81–186.00 mg/100 g d.w; 1200.00–6397.00 nmol/g f.w | 230.00 mg/100 g d.w | 460.00 mg/100 g d.w | 690.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Threonine | 0.67–2.84 mg/100 g f.w; 14.00–104.32 mg/100 g d.w | 240.00 mg/100 g d.w | 450.00 mg/100 g d.w | 550.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Histidine | 0.07–5.50 mg/100 g f.w; 18.70–99.00 mg/100 g d.w; 108.00–389.00 nmol/g f.w | 70.00 mg/100 g d.w | 260.00 mg/100 g d.w | ||
| Phenylalanine | 0.38–23.00 mg/100 g f.w; 10.00–162.99 mg/100 g d.w; 51.20–144.00 nmol/g f.w | 260.00 mg/100 g d.w | 540.00 mg/100 g d.w | 610.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Methionine | 0.41–1.20 mg/100 g f.w; 10.34–616.00 mg/100 g d.w; 3653.00–5600.00 nmol/g f.w | 90.00 mg/100 g d.w | 190.00 mg/100 g d.w | 270.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Tryptophan | 240.00–880.00 nmol/g f.w | ||||
| Aspartic acid | 0.92–30.00 mg/100 g f.w; 69.00–816.00 mg/100 g d.w; 6.10–27.30 nmol/g f.w | 1230.00 mg/100 g d.w | 1510.00 mg/100 g d.w | 1570.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Arginine | 0.08–9.00 mg/100 g f.w; 22.70–81.50 mg/100 g d.w; 74.60–146.60 nmol/g f.w | 1230.00 mg/100 g d.w | 1510.00 mg/100 g d.w | 1460.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Glycine | 0.12–0.90 mg/100 g f.w; 5.54–310.00 mg/100 g d.w; 541.00–2421.00 nmol/g f.w | 370.00 mg/100 g d.w | 720.00 mg/100 g d.w | 630.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Glutamic acid | 1.62–180.00 mg/100 g f.w; 51.00–3551.00 mg/100 g d.w; 34.6–84.00 nmol/g f.w | 3850.00 mg/100 g d.w | 2950.00 mg/100 g d.w | 7210.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Proline | 0.09–1.56 mg/100 g f.w; 43.11–1884.00 mg/100 g d.w; 60.50–218.60 nmol/g f.w | 230.00 mg/100 g d.w | 530.00 mg/100 g d.w | ||
| Cysteine | 53.30–149.00 nmol/g f.w | 70.00 mg/100 g d.w | 210.00 mg/100 g d.w | 230.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Serine | 0.09–10.62 mg/100 g f.w; 18.00–135.30 mg/100 g d.w; 0.66–1.44 nmol/g f.w | 250.00 mg/100 g d.w | 560.00 mg/100 g d.w | 170.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Alanine | 0.18–5.31 mg/100 g f.w; 15.9–90.30 mg/100 g d.w; 704.00–1653.00 nmol/g f.w | 380.00 mg/100 g d.w | 600.00 mg/100 g d.w | 710.00 mg/100 g d.w | |
| Tyrosine | 0.13–1.27 mg/100 g f.w; 12.00–24.10 mg/100 g d.w; 226.60–413.30 nmol/g f.w | 690.00 mg/100 g d.w | |||
| Asparagine | 1.74–9.13 mg/100 g f.w; 21.55–246.00 mg/100 g d.w; 349.30–1816.00 nmol/g f.w | ||||
| Glutamine | 15.00–36.30 mg/100 g f.w; 54.00–1604.00 mg/100 g d.w; 108.00–986.60 nmol/g f.w | ||||
| GABA | 10.50–12.00 mg/100 g f.w; 174.00–735.10 mg/100 g d.w |
3.5. Fatty acid composition
The nutritional values of tomato and tomato by-products include many fatty acid types (Table 4). Primary fatty acids in tomato and tomato peels, pulp, seeds, and pomace are linoleic acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, and linolenic acid. Some fatty acids are also present in tomato and tomato by-products at low concentrations compared to primary fatty acids. These fatty acids include tridecanoic acid, myristic acid, palmitoleic acid, pentadecanoic acid, margaric acid, elaidic acid, octadecadienoic acid, arachidic acid as well as eicosadienoic acid, behenic acid, tricosanoic acid and tetracosanoic acid (Table 4). Fatty acids are vital in the human body as modulators of membranes, energy suppliers, and storage material [38]. The essential fatty acids are considered functional food and nutraceuticals having cardioprotective, antiatherogenic, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, antiarrhythmic, hypolipidemic, anticancer, and antidiabetes [[51], [52], [53]]. The composition and content of fatty acids in tomatoes depend on the cultural environment, variety, storage conditions, and ripening level. For instance, Khan and colleagues [54] reported that the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide in the air affects not only the fatty acid content but also the proximate composition, elemental concentration, and vitamin C contents of tomatoes. Moreover, Saini and colleagues [9] reported that significant increases in polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenoids, and α-tocopherol induce tomato ripening.
Table 4.
Fatty composition of tomato by-products.
| Fatty composition | Tomato peels (mg/100 g) | Tomato peels (mg/100 g) | Tomato pulp (mg/100 g) | Tomato seeds (mg/100 g) | Tomato pomace (mg/100 g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tridecanoic acid | 510.00–2030.00 | – | – | – | – | [ [21,47,54]] |
| Myristic acid | 1.00–360 | 340.00 | – | 410.00 | ||
| Pentadecanoic acid | 1.00–2.00 | – | – | 90.00 | ||
| Pentadecenoic acid | – | – | – | 90.00 | ||
| Palmitic acid | 46.00–17700.00 | 15190.00 | 251.20–713.90 | 943.80–2371.30 | 16320.00 | |
| Palmitoleic acid | 2.00 | 1820.00 | – | – | 640.00 | |
| Heptadecanoic acid | 1.00–3.00 | – | – | – | 190.00 | |
| Heptadecenoic acid | – | – | – | – | 520.00 | |
| Stearic acid | 10.00–6240.00 | 6840.00 | 57.00–121.20 | 120.90–762.00 | 5430.00 | |
| Oleic cis | 5.00–26600.00 | 19140.00 | 39.10–198.30 | 202.30–3053.10 | 18500.00 | |
| Elaidic acid | 1.00–7.00 | |||||
| Cis linoleic acid | 7.00–49300.00 | 52410.00 | 335.90–1419.30 | 2064.20–9325.50 | 51910.00 | |
| Trans linoleic acid | 2.00–4.00 | |||||
| Α-Linolenic acid | 63.00–5610.00 | 4260.00 | 208.80–548.80 | 403.50–729.60 | 3350.00 | |
| Octadecatetraenoic acid | 480.00 | |||||
| Eicosadienoic acid | 6.00 | 150.00 | ||||
| Eicosatrienoic acid | 70.00 | |||||
| Docosadienoic acid | 390.00 | |||||
| Docosatrienoic acid | 550.00 | |||||
| Docosatrienoic acid | 130.00 | |||||
| Tricosanoic acid | 1.00–4.00 | |||||
| Tetracosanoic acid | 2.00–7.00 | |||||
| Behenic acid | 1.00–300.00 | 8.30–20.70 | 24.00–41.40 | |||
| Eicosapentaenoic | 260.00 | |||||
| Lignoceric | 650.00 | 6.30–22.90 | 31.00–42.10 | 290.00 | ||
| Arachidic acid | 3.00–630.00 | 21.30–50.30 | 75.50–125.00 |
4. Bioactive compounds
Bioactive compounds present in tomatoes and their TP include tetraterpenoids (α and β carotene, lycopene, lutein, zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin), tocols (tocopherols and tocotrienols), polyphenols (phenolic acids, flavonoids), policosanol, canolols, phytosterols and dietary fibers (Fig. 2). These various phytochemicals are unevenly distributed in the different parts of the vegetable. The most representative phytochemicals in TP are carotenoids, polyphenols, tocols, and phytosterols. The others (policosanol, canolols, and phytosterols) are less represented, although they ensure no less critical biological functions.
4.1. Carotenoids
Carotenoids are one of the main constituents of TP. Nagarajan and colleagues [55] reported a total carotenoid content of 9.37–10.81 mg/100 g for wet samples. Vági and colleagues (2007) recorded the total carotenoid content of dried TP to be 34.86–195.99 mg/100 mg/100 g using supercritical carbon dioxide as an extraction medium. Among carotenoids, TP has a higher concentration of β-carotene, estimated between 3.40 and 5.55 mg/100 g [56,57]. Lycopene is a pigment found mainly in tomato peels that deteriorates quickly upon exposure to light, although it is resistant to thermal processing [58]. Lycopene content in TP varies greatly depending on the tomato variety and extraction conditions. The lycopene content of peels is two and a half and five times greater than that of seeds and pulp, respectively [9,19]. Its concentration in the peels can reach 288 mg/100 g [6]. In addition, it has shown highly potent antioxidant activity, one hundred times greater than tocols [59]. Palomo and colleagues [57] and Concha-Meyer [60] reported a lycopene concentration of 0.001–7.74 mg/100 g, which is low compared to the β-carotene content reported in dried TP. In contrast, Vági and colleagues [61] proved that the percentage of lycopene in the carotenoid-rich extract was 70–90 %, making lycopene the most valuable compound among the others in TP with a concentration of 31.40 mg/100 g. Zhang and colleagues [62] reported a lycopene content in freeze-dried pomace to be dry at 32 g/100 g, while Eh and Teoh [63] determined a 5.11 mg/g by applying ultrasound-assisted extraction. Recently, a study demonstrated that both drying methods of TP and extraction techniques influence the yield of lycopene, which could vary from 5.66 to 59.66 μg/g [64]. Other carotenoids include lutein, neo-lutein, α-cryptoxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, lycoxanthin, cis-lycoxanthin, lycopene, and neo-lycopene [61].
4.2. Phenolic compounds
TP is a source of phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids and flavonoids. The total phenolic content of TP is determined between 0.94 mg GAE/g and 1.03 mg GAE/g as affected by the extraction techniques [65]. The microwave-assisted extraction technique's total phenolic content was 2.85–17.87 mg GAE/g, whereas the total phenolic content for ultrasound-assisted extraction was between 1.81 and 18.65 mg GAE/g [66]. Eight phenolic compounds were identified in TP, including the phenolic acids and flavonoids commonly found in tomatoes [65,67,68]. They include chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, rutin, isoquercetin, quercetin, ferulic acid, gallic acid and naringenin. Bao and colleagues [65] reported that TP's major phenolic compounds are gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, naringenin, and rutin. Further phenolic compounds, including p-coumaric acid, kaempferol 3-O-glucoside, and (+)-catechin, have been identified in TP extracted with deep eutectic solvents [69,70]. In addition, Abbasi-Parizad and colleagues [71] reported besides the above-cited compounds, 31.50, 12.90, 59.70, 32.30, 98.00, and 14.70 μg/g of vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, sinapic acid, myricetin, and apigenin, respectively.
4.3. Tocopherols and phytosterol
Additional bioactive molecules have been found in the TP, including tocopherol, health-preventive phytosterol, and vitamin C, which are often extracted with lycopene and other hydrophilic antioxidant molecules, such as flavonoids and phenolic acids [71]. Tocopherols are mainly localized in tomato seeds. The individual tocopherols, including α-tocopherol, γ-tocotrienol, γ-tocopherol, and δ-tocopherol, have been identified in TP with concentrations of 88.00–3600.00, 96.00–1655.00, 17.00–922.00 and 11.00–913.00 μg/g, respectively [61,72]. Regarding the β-sitosterol, the contents in TP ranged between 0.68 and 6.21 mg/100 g dry material [61]. Moreover, campesterol (1359.00 μg/g), stigmasterol (2027.00 μg/g), and β-sitosterol (8236.00 μg/g) have been discovered in TP [72].
4.4. Other bioactive molecules
Among the less-represented biomolecules of TP, policosanol is getting more and more attention. It is a chemical compound consisting of various long-chain aliphatic fatty alcohols. It was initially found in natural sources such as sugarcane and beeswax. Recently, it has been identified in plant products such as cereals, fruits, leaves, seeds, nuts, and animal products [2]. TP, especially tomato seed oil, contains a significant amount of policosanol (64–72 mg/kg). Several extraction methods, including conventional (Solvent extraction, saponification, transesterification) and emerging extraction methods (Supercritical CO2, ultrasonic-assisted, microwave-assisted, and pressurized solvent), enhance the extraction of policosanol from its matrix. Among these, Shen and colleagues concluded that the supercritical CO2 extraction method is the best in terms of purity, product yield, and extraction time [73]. However, it is a costly extraction method.
Besides, despite its high unsaturated fatty acids (80 %) content, tomato seed oil demonstrated excellent heat (180 °C for 50 h) stability [74]. Bioactive compounds of this oil, especially tocols and polyphenols, ensure this thermal stability. Canolol is the only known lipophilic phenolic compound formed from the hydrolysis followed by decarboxylation of sinapine during processing. It was reported that roasting the seeds before extraction resulted in a significant increase (up to 100-120-fold) in canolol formation compared to unroasted seeds [75,76]. As a lipophilic phenolic compound, canolol is a critical biomolecule responsible for the thermal stability observed with tomato seed oil [76].
5. Health benefits of TP bioactive compounds
5.1. Health benefits of TP
The main health-promoting effects of TP phytochemicals (carotenoids, tocols, polyphenols, and sterols) are their potent antioxidant activities and, consequently, their protective effects against chronic diseases are related to the oxidative effect. The primary health benefits of TP biomolecules are displayed in Fig. 2. In addition, it has been reported that TP possesses more significant biological effects than tomatoes. For instance, Widjaja and colleagues showed that TP contains powerful antithrombotic activities, even more important than tomatoes [77]. In addition, a recent clinical study showed that the daily oral intake for five days of 1 g of TP aqueous extract containing nucleosides and polyphenols inhibited human platelet aggregation [57].
Moreover, hamsters fed diets enriched with TP (42 %), defatted tomato seeds (18 %), and tomato seeds (10 %) showed a reduction in total cholesterol levels [78]. These authors concluded that the content of bioactive protein, dietary fiber, and polyphenols of different tomato by-products was responsible for reducing total cholesterol levels. Dietary fibers are known for their satietogenic effects in humans. Recent recommendations indicate a daily intake of 25 g and 38 g for adult women and men [6]. Additionally, dietary fiber and polyphenols are widely cited in the literature as having important antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and exert significant preventive and curative effects against certain chronic diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [6]. Likewise, policosanol is another relevant lipophilic biomolecule of TP. It has a potent antioxidant and exhibits antimicrobial and antidermatophytic properties against pathogen germs [73]. Several studies reported the multiple biological properties of policosanol against chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, obesity, aging, cerebrovascular disease, type 2 hypercholesterolemia, and Parkinson's disease [73,79]. According to these authors, the daily dose recommended ranges between 5 and 80 mg/d depending on whether one wants to lower serum cholesterol levels or treat type 2 diabetes or others. Other bioactive compounds, such as phytosterols and canolols, have also shown significant health effects. For example, phytosterols are intensely involved in preventing and treating certain chronic hormone-dependent diseases. In addition, they contribute to the reduction of plasma LDL levels [78]. As for canolol, it is highly potent in free radical scavenging and exhibits antimutagenic activity against the action of Salmonella [76]. Its anticancer effects are also reported.
Lycopene is the primary bioactive compound of tomato pomace. The investigations showed that it has tremendous health benefits.
5.2. Health benefits of lycopene
Like all compounds of the tetraterpenoid family, Lycopene plays a pivotal biological role in human well-being. Some studies have reported that lycopene has anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective activities and may also exhibit biological effects in certain chronic diseases, including cancers, diabetes, obesity, and other metabolic syndromes [80,81]. In addition, lycopene shows potent biological effects against harmful agents like mycotoxins, heavy metals, pesticides, and other natural toxins [59]. However, it is essential to note that the presence of tomato seed oil followed by heat treatment (pasteurization) significantly improves the bioaccessibility of lycopene and other carotenoids and increases the positive digestion of lipids [82]. This could be one of the most relevant ways to maximize the bioactivity of carotenoid compounds in humans. Several studies have reported the preventive role of lycopene in the risk of prostate cancer development and its protective properties against hepatotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by various agents.
5.2.1. Prevention of prostate cancer
Clinical and epidemiological research has shown an inverse association between consuming foods containing lycopene and the risk of prostate cancer. Moreover, most in vivo studies have confirmed the anticancer activities of lycopene, particularly in prostate cancer [83]. For Mirahmadi et al. [84], lycopene can exert its anticancer effect through various pathways: by blocking the gap junction molecules and inhibiting the colony formation, decreasing the motility, increasing the anti-oxidative and anti-proliferative effects, reducing inflammatory cytokines, etc. For example, Jiang et al. [85] have demonstrated that the anticancer effect of lycopene is linked to its role in suppressing inflammatory responses. Soares et al. [86] observed that lycopene extracted from tomato sauce and ketchup promoted a decrease in some prostate cancer cells. The antioxidant properties of lycopene should help to neutralize reactive oxygen species, thereby reducing oxidative stress and tumor progression. However, when combined with vitamin E or docetaxel, the preventive effect of lycopene on prostate cancer is more effective [87].
5.2.2. Protection against hepatotoxicity
Hepatotoxicity poses a significant threat to liver health. It results from exposure to various chemical, medicinal, or toxic agents. However, lycopene is known to have a critical protective effect against many toxins, including bacterial toxins and some mycotoxins [59]. For the same authors, the combination of lycopene with vitamin E has a significative effect against aflatoxin toxicity. It has also been reported that tomato lycopene has an inhibition action on the impact of some bacterial toxins such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide, microcystin-LRs, and other toxins like D-galactosamine [59,88]. According to some authors, Lycopene also has a substantial protective effect on various chemicals and metals such as cadmium, copper, mercury, lead, etc. [89,90]. Hedayati et al. [59] link the protect effect of lycopene against hepatotoxicity to its anti-oxidative, free-radical scavenging, chelating, and anti-apoptotic properties. All of these have the potential to modify the inflammatory response.
5.2.3. Mitigation of genotoxicity induced by different agents
Genotoxicity resulting from high exposure to genotoxic agents, of which the most important are mutagenic or carcinogenic chemicals and ionizing radiation, can promote DNA alterations and ultimately increase the risk of cancer development. Previous studies have demonstrated that in many cells (including rat liver and human lymphocytes), lycopene acts to prevent oxidative DNA damage [91,92]. For Srinivasan et al. [93], lycopene can be considered a natural protector against γ-radiation induced DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant status in primary culture of isolated rat hepatocytes. Moreover, Scolastici et al. [91] found that lycopene reduced the genotoxic effects of the agents when treated CHO cells with different genotoxic agents such as methylmethanesulphonate, H2O2, and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide.
In summary, lycopene shows great promise as a preventative agent in reducing the risk of prostate cancer. In addition to this aspect, the different protective properties of this natural pigment against genotoxicity and hepatotoxicity make it an excellent candidate for therapeutic applications that aim to protect liver cells but also to prevent specific harmful genetic alterations.
6. Effect of TP on physicochemical properties of food products
6.1. Effect of TP on physicochemical properties of bakery products
Recently, the trends in valorizing industrial by-products led to the formulation of new food products [94,95]. Using by-products from tomatoes in substituting or replacing raw materials enriches the newly formulated food products in bioingredients. The effects of the partial substitution of wheat flour with tomato seed powder or tomato pomace powder (TPP) on the physical and chemical characteristics of bakery products are shown in Table 5. The partial replacement of wheat flour with TPP in bakery products increased the chemical composition (moisture, crude protein, lipids, ash, and crude fiber) [16,[96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], mineral content (i.e., K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Fe, and Zn), dietary fiber content, polyphenolic and tetraterpenoid compounds of these food products [16,99,100]. In contrast, the carbohydrate content decreased with increasing the level of substitution [97,99,100]. Cream crackers made from wheat flour and TPP showed the same tendencies with increasing carotenoids and tocols content [19]. Moreover, Mironeasa and colleagues [98] reported that in the composite flours made from wheat flour and tomato seed flour, the fat, protein, and ash increased as the level of tomato seed flour increased, whereas the moisture content decreased. Refined wheat flour partially substituted with 35 and 40 % TP in bread and muffins increased dietary fiber, vitamin C, antioxidant activity, and mineral content (Na, K, Mg, Ca, Fe) [37].
Table 5.
Proximate, chemical and bioactive compositions of TP-formulated products.
| Food products | Biscuits |
Cake |
Crackers |
Bread |
Muffin |
Reference s | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | ||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 7.5 | 10 | 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 7.5 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 40 | [ [16,19,37,99,100]] | |
| Proximate composition (g/100g) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Moisture | 3.69 | 4.51 | 5.30 | 6.14 | 6.97 | 21.75 | 22.57 | 23.35 | 24.21 | 25.04 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 33.2 | 34 | 32 | 35.9 | |
| Crude protein | 19.19 | 19.71 | 20.23 | 20.75 | 21.27 | 15.59 | 15.97 | 16.35 | 16.73 | 17.11 | n.d | 7.63 | n.d | 7.80 | n.d | 7.22 | 7.52 | 3.5 | 4.08 | |
| Crude Fat | 30.10 | 30.29 | 30.47 | 30.66 | 30.84 | 20.32 | 20.61 | 20.90 | 21.19 | 21.48 | n.d | 16.75 | n.d | 17.62 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Ash | 0.89 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 1.15 | 1.57 | 1.63 | 1.68 | 1.74 | 1.80 | n.d | 1.52 | n.d | 1.55 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Crude fiber | 3.60 | 3.80 | 4.00 | 4.19 | 4.39 | 4.49 | 4.69 | 4.87 | 5.08 | 5.25 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 2.00 | 4.05 | 2.99 | 3.52 | |
| Carbohydrate | 3.60 | 3.80 | 4.00 | 4.19 | 4.39 | 58.03 | 57.10 | 56.20 | 55.26 | 54.36 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Mineral composition (mg/100g) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ca | 24.44 | 24.49 | 24.53 | 24.64 | 24.87 | 40.07 | 40.12 | 40.17 | 40.22 | 40.29 | n.d | 36.62 | n.d | 49.39 | n.d | 22.39 | 27.45 | 11.30 | 14.19 | |
| Zn | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.27 | n.d | 1.1 | n.d | 1.78 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | ||
| Fe | 1.43 | 1.49 | 1.54 | 1.60 | 1.65 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.12 | 1.17 | n.d | 1.26 | n.d | 1.58 | n.d | 2.50 | 2.90 | 1.49 | 3.48 | |
| Mg | 22.50 | 23.06 | 23.62 | 24.17 | 24.73 | 14.09 | 14.65 | 15.21 | 15.76 | 16.32 | n.d | 28.39 | n.d | 30.61 | n.d | 37.18 | 44.93 | 25.50 | 28.62 | |
| K | 16.36 | 17.09 | 17.82 | 18.55 | 19.28 | 22.61 | 23.34 | 24.07 | 24.80 | 25.53 | n.d | 210.8 | n.d | 273.8 | n.d | 133.74 | 197.61 | 71.53 | 100.39 | |
| Na | 38.87 | 39.96 | 41.05 | 42.14 | 43.23 | 68.53 | 69.62 | 70.71 | 71.80 | 72.89 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 647.94 | 615.84 | 381.37 | 461.40 | |
| Mn | 0.53 | 1.04 | 1.55 | 2.07 | 2.58 | 0.21 | 0.72 | 1.23 | 1.75 | 2.26 | n.d | 1.23 | n.d | 1.44 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Dietary fiber (g/100g) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total dietary fiber | 1.84 | 2.66 | 3.48 | 4.31 | 5.14 | 2.65 | 3.47 | 4.29 | 5.12 | 5.94 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Soluble dietary fiber | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.12 | 1.22 | n.d | n.d | n.d | 2.01 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Insoluble dietary fiber | 1.14 | 1.87 | 2.61 | 3.35 | 4.09 | 1.79 | 2.52 | 3.26 | 4.00 | 4.72 | n.d | 3.48 | n.d | 4.67 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Total phenolic content | 36.52 | 56.88 | 77.25 | 96.84 | 117.96 | 72.34 | 92.70 | 113.06 | 133.43 | 154.79 | n.d | 68.59 | n.d | 104.40 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Total flavonoid content | 28.45 | 38.76 | 49.08 | 60.02 | 68.45 | 51.40 | 61.72 | 72.03 | 81.89 | 92.66 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Fatty acids (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Palmitic | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 20.28 | 20.54 | 20.58 | 20.88 | 21.35 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Stearic | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 4.16 | 4.18 | 4.54 | 4.77 | 4.92 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| oleic | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 31.09 | 32.04 | 32.06 | 32.19 | 33.10 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Linoleic | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 38.60 | 39.24 | 39.31 | 40.66 | 41.74 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| MUFA | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 33.52 | 33.99 | 34.28 | 33.92 | 33.75 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| PUFA | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 40.64 | 40.41 | 40.21 | 40.78 | 40.94 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| SFA | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 25.83 | 25.62 | 25.53 | 25.52 | 25.35 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Carotenoid composition (mg/k) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Lutein | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.59 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Zeaxanthin | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| 15-cis-neurosporene | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | nd | 2.24 | 2.46 | 2.77 | 3.47 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| δ-carotene-isomer | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | nd | 1.56 | 1.61 | 1.63 | 1.69 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| trans-lycopene | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | nd | 2.35 | 2.49 | 2.53 | 2.76 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Tocols composition (mg/kg) | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | ||||||||||||||||
| α-tocopherol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 18.52 | 21.40 | 23.65 | 24.10 | 25.46 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| α-tocotrienol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 7.76 | 9.10 | 8.83 | 8.64 | 8.81 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| β-tocopherol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 2.53 | 2.05 | 3.03 | 2.25 | 2.24 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| β-tocotrienol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 13.21 | 14.51 | 14.15 | 14.47 | 14.36 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| γ-tocopherol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | nd | 2.17 | 2.80 | 3.94 | 4.55 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| δ-tocopherol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 15.57 | 16.09 | 15.43 | 15.20 | 15.02 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| δ-tocotrienol | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | nd | 0.90 | 1.55 | 1.60 | 1.19 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Phenolic composition (mg/kg) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4OH-benzoic acid der | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 87.60 | 94.78 | 90.92 | 91.06 | 92.21 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Coumaric acid | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 0.40 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.92 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Coumaric acid der | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 3.09 | 4.27 | 5.52 | 6.35 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Ferulic acid | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 2.55 | 4.30 | 4.28 | 4.44 | 5.13 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Gallic acid | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 9.93 | 70.99 | 124.81 | 160.65 | 173.12 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Naringenin | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 2.96 | 5.20 | 6.98 | 7.69 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Naringenin der | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 0.73 | 1.28 | 1.84 | 2.39 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Quercitin der | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 1.86 | 3.23 | 4.15 | 5.00 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Rutin | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | 9.81 | 17.26 | 23.76 | 30.20 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
The values are given on the dry weight basis, n.d = not determined.
Padalino and colleagues [101] investigated the impact of incorporating different particle sizes of tomato peels on durum wheat whole-meal spaghetti. The results showed that fine particles of tomato peels help to enhance the spaghetti quality. While peel particle size did not affect protein and available carbohydrate content, the fine particles induced significant increments of tetraterpenoids in formulated samples. The dietary fiber content of samples supplemented with fine particles is less than that of samples supplemented with coarse. Also, the results of in vitro starch digestibility suggested that particle size influenced the starch digestibility, which decreases in spaghetti enriched with coarse particle size.
6.2. Effect of TP on dough rheological behavior, physicochemical characteristics of composite dough of bakery products
Incorporating tomato seed flour (TSF) in dough formulations influenced dough rheological properties (Table 6). Indeed, the dough extensibility, index of swelling, and baking strength decrease when the TSF level increases [97]. Likewise, replacing wheat flour with tomato seeds flour by up to 10 % increased the bread samples' loaf volume, porosity, and elasticity [97]. Otherwise, wheat flour supplemented at 6 and 10 % levels (w/w flour basis) increased bread crumb elasticity and reduced specific volume and bread crumb porosity [102]. TP added increased the crumb firmness, resulting in a lower hardness value in tomato-based bread and muffins. Furthermore, incorporating TSF in the dough also increased the chewiness, cohesiveness, and springiness [37]. Mironeasa and colleagues [98] concluded that the partial replacement of refined wheat flour by TSF strengthens the dough system of bakery products.
Table 6.
Dough rheological behavior, physicochemical characterization of composite dough or products obtained with wheat and tomato seed flours or TP powder.
| Characteristics | Bread |
Muffin |
Cracker |
Sources | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | ||||||||||
| 0 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | [ [19,37] [102]] | |
| Specific volume (cm3/g) | 5.18 | 4.84 | 4.81 | ||||||||||
| Bread crumb porosity (%) | 85.28 | 84.24 | 84.15 | ||||||||||
| Bread crumb Elasticity (%) | 89.23 | 92.18 | 90.77 | ||||||||||
| Hardness (N) | 3.68 | 0.011 | 70.82 | 47.14 | |||||||||
| Adhesiveness (Ns) | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 0.59 | |||||||||
| Springiness | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.62 | |||||||||
| Cohesiveness | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.99 | |||||||||
| Gumminess | 1.17 | 1.34 | 50.79 | 46.88 | |||||||||
| Chewiness | 4.58 | 5.32 | 50.03 | 96.49 | |||||||||
| Peak viscosity (BU) | 895.0 | 898.5 | 946.0 | 971.0 | 1024.0 | ||||||||
| Breakdown | 297.0 | 308.0 | 345.0 | 390.0 | 422.5 | ||||||||
| Final viscosity (BU) | 1042.5 | 1047.5 | 1058.0 | 1068.0 | 1147.0 | ||||||||
| Pasting temperature (°C) | 60.7 | 61.3 | 61.3 | 61.5 | 61.8 | ||||||||
BU: Brabender Units.
6.3. Effect of TP on meat by-products
Recently, meat by-products have been formulated by replacing the fat content with different levels of TP (Table 7). For instance, tomato peels were incorporated in beef burgers and sausages up to 15 % [103], resulting in decreased fat levels, and contrast, protein, ash, and fiber levels increased in the end products. Consequently, the energy value that beef burgers and sausages should provide decreased significantly [103]. This result shows that TP is a suitable coproduct for formulating low-calorie foods. In the same study, it was figured out that the introduction of tomato peels in meat products showed a positive effect on the cooking yield, reducing the loss during the cooking decreased with increasing the level of tomato peels. The decrease in the cooking loss may be due to the high fiber content of tomato peels, which bound more water [103]. This result agrees with that reported by Namir and colleagues, who found that beef burgers formulated by partially replacing the fat level with tomato fiber pectin (TFP) showed a decrease in cooking loss and a reduction in the diameter of burgers [104]. In addition, Yadav and colleagues showed that adding tomato peel to chicken sausages decreased moisture content and increased ash and crude fiber contents [105]. Moreover, the emulsion stability and cooking yield were significantly higher in the sausages containing 6 and 9 % tomato peels [105].
Table 7.
Effect of tomato peels as a fat replacer on the chemical composition of burger and sausage.
| Products |
Beef burger |
Beef sausage |
Chicken sausages |
Sources | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Component (%) on a dry weight basis | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | Substitution level (%) | ||||||||||
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | [103] [105] |
|
| Moisture | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 68.71 | 67.66 | 66.78 | 64.40 | |
| Crude protein | 41.50 | 41.94 | 42.50 | 43.13 | 42.25 | 42.48 | 42.96 | 43.16 | 173 | 169 | 167 | 166 | |
| Ether extract/fat | 32.25 | 31.51 | 30.69 | 30.12 | 34.98 | 32.44 | 31.86 | 30.23 | 89 | 85 | 82 | 82 | |
| Ash | 4.05 | 4.20 | 4.53 | 4.76 | 3.39 | 3.58 | 3.88 | 4.07 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.6 | |
| Crude fiber | 3.00 | 4.15 | 4.89 | 5.79 | 2.00 | 4.25 | 6.50 | 8.72 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 2.7 | |
| Total carbohydrates | 22.20 | 22.35 | 22.28 | 21.96 | 19.38 | 21.50 | 21.30 | 22.54 | |||||
| Available carbohydrates | 19.20 | 18.20 | 17.39 | 16.17 | 17.38 | 17.25 | 14.80 | 13.82 | |||||
6.4. Effect of TP on snacks' nutritional quality
Snacks supplemented with antioxidant and dietary fiber sources, such as TP powder or other fruit pomace powder, have been formulated to improve their nutritional and functional properties. Generally, the partial replacement of wheat flour with fruit pomace powder increases snacks' physicochemical, nutritious, and functional characteristics. For example, adding tomato seed meal to tarhana increased its protein, oil, insoluble dietary fiber, total dietary fiber, ash, mineral, and total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity [16]. In addition, the incorporation of tomato seed increased tarhana's lysine, phenylalanine, threonine, serine, alanine, glycine, histidine, aspartic acid, arginine, and tyrosine contents [16]. Similarly, El-Araby reported that the snacks' fortification with apple pomace powder and TPP increased its contents in protein, ash, fiber, calcium, potassium, and phenolic compounds [106].
7. Sensory liking of TP-based food products
Due to its natural pigment (carotenoid and polyphenolic) contents, color is one of the primary sensory effects induced by TP, especially tomato peels, on food products containing them. Generally, the TP addition of the food product results in a decrease in lightness (L* color value), while the redness (a* color value) and yellowness (b* color value) significantly increased [20,37,107]. A study showed that ice creams containing 2 % and 3 % carotenoids extracted from tomato peels had the best sensory characteristics in terms of color, aroma, body, and texture, melting and mixing compared to ice creams enriched with 1 %, 4 %, and 5 % of the extract. Furthermore, the enrichment of the sausage by the TP leads to an improvement in the color attractiveness of the final products [108]. These authors say TP positively affects consumer liking, including acceptability and preference. Indeed, substituting 6 % dry TP in refined wheat flour resulted in bread with good sensory properties. The overall acceptability was also good with this percentage, but when the substitution of dry TP was increased to 10 %, the bread obtained had a fair acceptability [102]. However, a recent investigation reported that extruded snacks containing 10 % TP performed the best scores in terms of physical and sensory characteristics [20]. This shows that the level of TP fortification and acceptance of the final product varies depending on the food matrix.
Moreover, a study by Concha-Meyer and colleagues (2019) assessed consumers' sensory appreciation and purchase intention for bread containing different portions (0, 5, and 10 %) of TPP. According to the panelists, the sample containing 5 % TP had a mild and pleasant aftertaste compared to the sample containing 10 % TP. The former had similar sensory characteristics to the control. The weak score obtained by the latter had been reported by Isik & Tokpaya [16], who used 12 % of TP in the cracker. This bitter aftertaste would be due to furostanol saponin and probably the higher phenolic compound content in the products containing more TP powder. According to these authors, consumer interest in health and sensory liking significantly affects the product's purchase intent. In addition, the relatively low cost of the TP product is a comparative advantage for functional food consumption. Moreover, several researchers [16,20,102] reported that incorporating up to 10 % of TP in baked goods and related products did not jeopardize its sensory acceptability.
8. Shelf life extension induced by TP
Extending the shelf life of food products is one of the main advantages of using TP in food applications. Adding TP (TP, TP constituent, or extract from both) at various doses in diverse food matrices has shown natural preservative effects on the final product by prolonging its shelf life (Table 8). For instance, the study of Mehta and colleagues (2018) showed that the partial substitution of refined wheat with 35 % and 40 % of TP in muffins and bread had extended their shelf life, regardless of the storage temperature. Compared to the control, the shelf life was lengthened from 24 to 72 h, depending on the treatment. In addition, replacing TP below 5 % in Barbari bread leads to delaying staling during the storage period (24–96 h) at 25 °C [109]. The bioactive compounds of TP, especially lycopene, β-carotene, polyphenols, and tetraterpenoids, while protecting against oxidative degradation, exert inhibition effects against spoilage microbes. As a result, the shelf life of final products containing TP increases significantly. These protective effects allowed the TP extract used at 400 mg/kg to extend the shelf life of traditional Tunisian butter to 60 days when stored at 4 °C without compromising the aroma development [17]. Similarly, the study by Andres and colleagues (2016) revealed that applying organic TP extracts on the surface of lamb meat extended its shelf life by 7 days [110]. Moreover, TP has shown a significant thixotropic effect on ketchup and has demonstrated its ability to improve the thermal stability of food products during heat processing [111].
Table 8.
Effect of TP on shelf life extension of food products.
| Food products | TP constituent | Incorporated Dose/percentage | Main outcome related to shelf life extent | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Tunisian butter (TTB) | TP extract | 400 mg of extract/kg | Protective effect against lipid peroxidation, prolongation of shelf-life up to 60 days | [17] |
| Bread and muffin | TP | 35–40 % in bread and muffin, respectively. | Increase the dietary fiber, vitamin C, antioxidant activity and minerals, prolongation of shelf-life up to 8 days and 12 days for bread and muffin, respectively | [37] |
| Meat longissimus thoracis | TP extract | 3 g of TP extract/36.13 ± 2.85 kg | Increase of potential antioxidant agents like lycopene, phenol and β-carotene contents, Prolongation of shelf-life up to 7 days | [110] |
| Bread | TP | 10 % tomato seed/100 g | Color intensity, expressed as the L*, a*, b* values of breads | [121] |
| Barbari bread | TP | ≤5 % | Delays staling during storage at 25 °C for 1–4 days | [109] |
| Bread | TP | 10 % dry tomato/100 g | Increase in moisture content, titratable acidity, and breadcrumb elasticity, reduction in specific volume and bread crumb porosity | [102] |
| Raw Fermented Sausages | freeze-dried TP | 1.5 % freeze-dried TP/100 g | Increase in antioxidant activity, reduced levels of nitrites, improved sausage shelf-life stability | [115] |
| Snack | TP | 10 % tomato pomace/100 g | Increase antioxidant activity, high storage stability | [122] |
| Bread | TP | 7 % tomato pomace power/100 g | Increase dough water absorption, reduction in dough arrival, development, and stability times, and increase dough softening after 5 and 12 min. | [109] |
9. Challenges and future trends
Research endeavors focused on utilizing agro-industrial by-products, such as fruit and vegetable pomace, as valuable constituents in food production hold substantial promise. This area of inquiry stands poised to make noteworthy contributions to enhancing food quality and the security of nutritional resources. TP is a rich source of minerals (K, Mg, Ca, P, Na, and Fe) and various vitamins, including C, E, and carotenoids, as the primary source of provitamin A. With this micronutrient and phytochemical contents, TP can be used as a cheap and valuable functional ingredient in addressing the most common micronutrient deficiencies in children under five, including iron, zinc, calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin A, in developing countries. However, its possible use as a fortifier in infant flour formulation must consider its high dietary fiber content since, according to Belović et al. [111], it can contain up to 60 % (on a dry matter basis). Lu and colleagues have recently demonstrated that yeast fermentation improves the bioaccessibility of nutrients and bioactive compounds in tomato juice [112]. This low-cost bioprocess can be used in increasing TP nutrient bioaccessibility, mainly when it is used in infant food formulation. Another essential food that TP could enrich is Gari. It is one of the most popular staple foods in Sub-Saharan Africa, made from cassava. It is a traditional food high in carbohydrates and deficient in micronutrients and other macronutrients [113]. Gari is consumed by both youth and adults. Therefore, fortification of gari with TP would be an effective way to combat nutritional insecurity in this region. Developing specific low-calorie food products could be another form of food valorization of TP.
Lipid oxidation and microbial degradation are the two significant biological phenomena threatening the stability of food products during storage. TP contains various phytochemical compounds that exhibit considerable antioxidant activities. In addition, research has shown that TP has antimicrobial properties that reduce many spoilage microorganisms [14,15,114,115]. Consequently, TP is also an essential ingredient for preserving certain food products. Thus, TP could be an excellent functional ingredient for improving foods' nutritional and sensory quality and their natural preservation during storage. Traditional fermented condiments from Africa, such as African locust bean-based condiments (Afitin, iru, soumbala, nététu) and African fermented fish (Lanhouin, momone, Guedj Jalan Mindeshi Dagaa Adjonfa) have a short shelf life due to lipid oxidation and lack of controlling microbial spoilage [113,116,117]. Therefore, preservation trials of these traditional fermented condiments with TP could be envisaged. Moreover, the study on the bioactive compounds of TP, in particular dietary fiber, is quite limited. Considering the mass importance of this constituent (60 %), its technological interest and its impact on the health of consumers must be dug into more deeply. Several studies have pointed out valorization of food wastes and by-products as a solution to improve the economic and environmental sustainability of the food production. Numerous valorization schemes have been proposed to explore food wastes and by-products as biomass suppliers to obtain different bio-based products. However, indication of the main challenges to guarantee the employment of TP in the food industry, should point out.
10. Conclusion
Thisreview updated and summarized the nutritional and bioactive properties and different food applications of TP. TP is a by-product of industrial tomato processing with nutritious and bioactive content. Its use as a food ingredient in relevant doses in various food products has enhanced its nutritional quality and sensory and functional properties and extended its shelf life. However, further work should address the effect of dietary fiber content in TP on the bioaccessibility of other bioactive compounds. In addition, the extraction and optimization of lycopene from TP peels using natural deep eutectic solvents and its use as a food colorant in replacement synthetic dyes should be explored.
Data availability statement
Data will be made available on request.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Ifagbémi Bienvenue Chabi: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Oscar Zannou: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Emmanuelle S.C.A. Dedehou: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Data curation. Bernolde Paul Ayegnon: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Data curation. Oloudé B. Oscar Odouaro: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Data curation. Sajid Maqsood: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation. Charis M. Galanakis: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation. Adéchola Pierre Polycarpe Kayodé: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from the International Science Foundation (Grant No. I-3-E-6622-1) awarded to the first author. He would like to thank Ms. Nathalie Persson Andrianasitera and Ms. Sirilak Pongpatipat for their invaluable assistance. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Samson Adékimbi for his technical assistance.
Contributor Information
Ifagbémi Bienvenue Chabi, Email: chabifagbemi@gmail.com.
Oscar Zannou, Email: zannouoscar@gmail.com.
Sajid Maqsood, Email: sajid.m@uaeu.ac.ae.
Charis M. Galanakis, Email: cgalanakis@chemlab.gr.
References
- 1.FAO, FAOSTAT - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United . 2017. Pesticides; p. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lardinois C.K., Karr S. Elsevier Inc.; 2022. Clinical Strategies for Reducing Cholesterol Levels. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Navarro-González I., García-Valverde V., García-Alonso J., Periago M.J. Chemical profile, functional and antioxidant properties of tomato peel fiber. Food Res. Int. 2011;44:1528–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pataro G., Carullo D., Bakar Siddique M.A., Falcone M., Donsì F., Ferrari G. Improved extractability of carotenoids from tomato peels as side benefits of PEF treatment of tomato fruit for more energy-efficient steam-assisted peeling. J. Food Eng. 2018;233:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.03.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pinela J., Barros L., Carvalho A.M., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) farmer’ varieties in Northeastern Portugal homegardens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012;50:829–834. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lu Z., Wang J., Gao R., Ye F., Zhao G. Sustainable valorisation of tomato pomace: a comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019;86:172–187. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu R., Chen B., Bai Y., Miao T., Rui L., Zhang H., Xia B., Li Y., Gao S., Wang X.D., Zhang D. Lycopene in protection against obesity and diabetes: a mechanistic review. Pharmacol. Res. 2020;159 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zuorro A., Fidaleo M., Lavecchia R. Enzyme-assisted extraction of lycopene from tomato processing waste. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2011;49:567–573. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saini R.K., Moon S.H., Keum Y.S. An updated review on use of tomato pomace and crustacean processing waste to recover commercially vital carotenoids. Food Res. Int. 2018;108:516–529. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carillo P., D'Amelia L., Dell'Aversana E., Faiella D., Cacace D., Giuliano B., Morrone B. Eco-friendly use of tomato processing residues for lactic acid production in campania. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018;64:223–228. doi: 10.3303/CET1864038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liadakis G., Kekes T., Frakolaki G., Giannou V., Tzia C. Elsevier Inc.; 2022. Ingredients for Food Products. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shea N.O., Arendt E.K., Gallagher E. Dietary fi bre and phytochemical characteristics of fruit and vegetable by-products and their recent applications as novel ingredients in food products. Innovat. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012;16:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Allison B.J., Simmons C.W. Valorization of tomato pomace by sequential lycopene extraction and anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy. 2017;105:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Carvalho G.C., de Camargo B.A.F., de Araújo J.T.C., Chorilli M. Lycopene: from tomato to its nutraceutical use and its association with nanotechnology. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021;118:447–458. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Binsuwaidan R., Sultan A.A., Negm W.A., Attallah N.G.M., Alqahtani M.J., Hussein I.A., Shaldam M.A., El-Sherbeni S.A., Elekhnawy E. Bilosomes as Nanoplatform for oral Delivery and modulated in vivo antimicrobial activity of lycopene. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:1–23. doi: 10.3390/ph15091043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isik C., Topkaya F. Effects OF tomato pomace SUPPLEMENTATION on chemical and effects of tomato pomace supplementation on chemical and nutritional properties. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2016;28:525–535. doi: 10.14674/1120-1770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abid Y., Azabou S., Jridi M., Khemakhem I., Bouaziz M., Attia H. Storage stability of traditional Tunisian butter enriched with antioxidant extract from tomato processing by-products. Food Chem. 2017;233:476–482. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Petrotos K., Gerasopoulos K. INC; 2022. 12. Sustainable Use of Tomato Pomace for the Production of High Added Value Food, Feed, and Nutraceutical Products. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nakov G., Brandolini A., Estivi L., Bertuglia K., Ivanova N., Jukić M., Komlenić D.K., Lukinac J., Hidalgo A. Effect of tomato pomace addition on chemical, technological, nutritional, and sensorial properties of cream crackers. Antioxidants. 2022;11:1–15. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yagci S., Calıskan R., Gunes Z.S., Capanoglu E., Tomas M. Impact of tomato pomace powder added to extruded snacks on the in vitro gastrointestinal behaviour and stability of bioactive compounds. Food Chem. 2022;368 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Elbadrawy E., Sello A. Evaluation of nutritional value and antioxidant activity of tomato peel extracts. Arab. J. Chem. 2016;9:S1010–S1018. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.11.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Erba D., Casiraghi M.C., Ribas-Agustí A., Cáceres R., Marfà O., Castellari M. Nutritional value of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown in greenhouse by different agronomic techniques. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013;31:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Raigón M.D., García-Martínez M.D., Chiriac O.P. Nutritional characterization of a traditional cultivar of tomato grown under organic conditions—cv. “Malacara,” Front. Nutr. 2022;8:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.810812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abdullahi I.I., Abdullahi N., Abdu A.M., Ibrahim A.S., Proximate Mineral and Vitamin analysis of fresh and canned tomato. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia. 2016;13:1163–1169. doi: 10.13005/bbra/2147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oboulbiga E.B., Parkouda C., Sawadogo-Lingani H., Compaoré E.W.R., Sakira A.K., Traoré A.S. Nutritional composition, physical characteristics and sanitary quality of the tomato variety mongol F1 from Burkina Faso. Food Nutr. Sci. 2017;8:444–455. doi: 10.4236/fns.2017.84030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ramos-Bueno R.P., Romero-González R., González-Fernández M.J., Guil-Guerrero J.L. Phytochemical composition and in vitro anti-tumour activities of selected tomato varieties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017;97:488–496. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duranova H., Valkova V., Gabriny L. Springer Netherlands; 2022. Chili Peppers (Capsicum spp.): the Spice Not Only for Cuisine Purposes: an Update on Current Knowledge. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ali M.Y., Sina A.A.I., Khandker S.S., Neesa L., Tanvir E.M., Kabir A., Khalil M.I., Gan S.H. Nutritional composition and bioactive compounds in tomatoes and their impact on human health and disease: a review. Foods. 2021:10. doi: 10.3390/foods10010045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kaboré K., Konaté K., Bazié D., Dakuyo R., Sanou A., Sama H., Santara B., Dicko M.H. Effects of growing zones on nutritional and bioactive compounds of by-products of two tomato cultivars. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022;10 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Silva Y.P.A., Borba B.C., Pereira V.A., Reis M.G., Caliari M., Brooks M.S.L., Ferreira T.A.P.C. Characterization of tomato processing by-product for use as a potential functional food ingredient: nutritional composition, antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;70:150–160. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2018.1489530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dubey P., Thakur V., Chattopadhyay M. Role of minerals and trace elements in diabetes and insulin resistance. Nutrients. 2020;12:1–17. doi: 10.3390/nu12061864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rapa S.F., Di Iorio B.R., Campiglia P., Heidland A., Marzocco S. Inflammation and oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease—potential therapeutic role of minerals, vitamins and plant-derived metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21 doi: 10.3390/ijms21010263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ramesh K., Paul V., Pandey R. Dynamics of mineral nutrients in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits during ripening: part II—off the plant. Plant Physiol. Reports. 2021;26:284–300. doi: 10.1007/s40502-020-00564-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Caruso G., De Pascale S., Cozzolino E., Cuciniello A., Cenvinzo V., Bonini P., Colla G., Rouphael Y. Yield and nutritional quality of Vesuvian piennolo tomato PDO as affected by farming system and biostimulant application. Agronomy. 2019;9:1–14. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9090505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.akubor P.I., Owuse A.U. Chemical Composition, functional and biscuit making properties of tomato peel flour. South Asian J. Food Technol. Environ. 2020;6:874–884. doi: 10.46370/sajfte.2020.v06i01.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Isik F., Yapar A. Effect of tomato seed supplementation on chemical and nutritional properties of tarhana. J. Food Meas. Char. 2017;11:667–674. doi: 10.1007/s11694-016-9436-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mehta D., Prasad P., Sangwan R.S., Yadav S.K. Tomato processing byproduct valorization in bread and muffin: improvement in physicochemical properties and shelf life stability. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018;55:2560–2568. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3176-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carvalho M.E.A., Piotto F.A., Gaziola S.A., Jacomino A.P., Jozefczak M., Cuypers A., Azevedo R.A. New insights about cadmium impacts on tomato: plant acclimation, nutritional changes, fruit quality and yield. Food Energy Secur. 2018;7:1–16. doi: 10.1002/fes3.131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kumar M., Chandran D., Tomar M., Bhuyan D.J., Grasso S., Sá A.G.A., Carciofi B.A.M., Radha, Dhumal S., Singh S., Senapathy M., Changan S., Dey A., Pandiselvam R., Mahato D.K., Amarowicz R., Rajalingam S., Vishvanathan M., Saleena L.A.K., Mekhemar M. Valorization potential of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seed: nutraceutical quality, food properties, safety aspects, and application as a health-promoting ingredient in foods. Horticulturae. 2022;8 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8030265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pereira R., Costa M., Velasco C., Cunha L.M., Lima R.C., Baião L.F., Batista S., Marques A., Sá T., Campos D.A., Pereira M., Jesus D., Fernández-Boo S., Costas B., Pintado M., Valente L.M.P. Comparative analysis between synthetic vitamin E and natural antioxidant sources from tomato, carrot and coriander in diets for market-sized Dicentrarchus labrax. Antioxidants. 2022;11 doi: 10.3390/antiox11040636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Amer F., Elkassas N., Salim I., El-Medany S., Aboelenin S.M., Shukry M., Taha A.E., Peris S., Soliman M., Mahrose K. Impacts of dietary supplementations of orange peel and tomato pomace extracts as natural sources for ascorbic acid on growth performance, carcass characteristics, plasma biochemicals and antioxidant status of growing rabbits. Animals. 2021;11 doi: 10.3390/ani11061688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.El Mashad H.M., Zhao L., Zhang R., Pan Z. Elsevier Inc.; 2019. Tomato. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhu Z., Zhang Y., Liu J., Chen Y., Zhang X. Exploring the effects of selenium treatment on the nutritional quality of tomato fruit. Food Chem. 2018;252:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sun C., Jin L., Cai Y., Huang Y., Zheng X., Yu T. L-Glutamate treatment enhances disease resistance of tomato fruit by inducing the expression of glutamate receptors and the accumulation of amino acids. Food Chem. 2019;293:263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Oms-Oliu G., Hertog M.L.A.T.M., Van de Poel B., Ampofo-Asiama J., Geeraerd A.H., Nicolai B.M. Metabolic characterization of tomato fruit during preharvest development, ripening, and postharvest shelf-life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011;62:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boggio S.B., Palatnik J.F., Heldt H.W., Valle E.M. Changes in amino acid composition and nitrogen metabolizing enzymes in ripening fruits of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Plant Sci. 2000;159:125–133. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00342-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nour V., Panaite T.D., Ropota M., Turcu R., Trandafir I., Corbu A.R. Nutritional and bioactive compounds in dried tomato processing waste. CyTA - J. Food. 2018;16:222–229. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2017.1383514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Knoblich M., Anderson B., Latshaw D. Analyses of tomato peel and seed byproducts and their use as a source of carotenoids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005;85:1166–1170. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fibiani M., Paolo D., Leteo F., Campanelli G., Picchi V., Bianchi G., Lo Scalzo R. Influence of year, genotype and cultivation system on nutritional values and bioactive compounds in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Food Chem. 2022;389 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Galanakis C.M. Sustainable applications for the valorization of cereal. Foods. 2022:1–15. doi: 10.3390/foods11020241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mišurcová L., Ambrožová J., Samek D. Seaweed lipids as nutraceuticals. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2011;64:339–355. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387669-0.00027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mobraten K., Haug T.M., Kleiveland C.R., Lea T. Omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs induce the same GPR120-mediated signalling events, but with different kinetics and intensity in Caco-2 cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Orsavova J., Misurcova L., Vavra Ambrozova J., Vicha R., Mlcek J. Fatty acids composition of vegetable oils and its contribution to dietary energy intake and dependence of cardiovascular mortality on dietary intake of fatty acids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:12871–12890. doi: 10.3390/ijms160612871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Khan I., Azam A., Mahmood A. The impact of enhanced atmospheric carbon dioxide on yield, proximate composition, elemental concentration, fatty acid and vitamin C contents of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013;185:205–214. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2544-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nagarajan J., Kay H.P., Krishnamurthy N.P., Ramakrishnan N.R., Aldawoud T.M.S., Galanakis C.M., Wei O.C. Extraction of carotenoids from tomato pomace via water-induced hydrocolloidal complexation. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1–16. doi: 10.3390/biom10071019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Concha-Meyer A., Palomo I., Plaza A., Tarone A.G., Maróstica Junior M.R., Sáyago-Ayerdi S.G., Fuentes E. Platelet anti-aggregant activity and bioactive compounds of ultrasound-assisted extracts from whole and seedless tomato pomace. Foods. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/foods9111564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Palomo I., Concha-Meyer A., Lutz M., Said M., Sáez B., Vásquez A., Fuentes E. Chemical characterization and antiplatelet potential of bioactive extract from tomato pomace (byproduct of tomato paste) Nutrients. 2019;11 doi: 10.3390/nu11020456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Story E.N., Kopec R.E., Schwartz S.J., Keith Harris G. An update on the health effects of tomato lycopene. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2010;1:189–210. doi: 10.1146/annurev.food.102308.124120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hedayati N., Naeini M.B., Nezami A., Hosseinzadeh H., Wallace Hayes A., Hosseini S., Imenshahidi M., Karimi G. Protective effect of lycopene against chemical and natural toxins: a review. Biofactors. 2019;45:5–23. doi: 10.1002/biof.1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Concha-Meyer A.A., Durham C.A., Colonna A.E., Hasenbeck A., Sáez B., Adams M.R. Consumer response to tomato pomace powder as an ingredient in bread: impact of sensory liking and benefit information on purchase intent. J. Food Sci. 2019;84:3774–3783. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vági E., Simándi B., Vásárhelyiné K.P., Daood H., Kéry Á., Doleschall F., Nagy B. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of carotenoids, tocopherols and sitosterols from industrial tomato by-products. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2007;40:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2006.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang K.S., Jiang H., Ren Y.X. The effect of technical parameters on lycopene extraction in supercritical fluid extraction from freeze-dried tomato pomace (peels and seeds) Adv. Mater. Res. 2011;236–238:2868–2871. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.236-238.2868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Eh A.L.S., Teoh S.G. Novel modified ultrasonication technique for the extraction of lycopene from tomatoes. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012;19:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chada P.S.N., Santos P.H., Rodrigues L.G.G., Goulart G.A.S., Azevedo dos Santos J.D., Maraschin M., Lanza M. Non-conventional techniques for the extraction of antioxidant compounds and lycopene from industrial tomato pomace (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using spouted bed drying as a pre-treatment. Food Chem. X. 2022;13 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bao Y., Reddivari L., Huang J.Y. Development of cold plasma pretreatment for improving phenolics extractability from tomato pomace. Innovat. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020;65 doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Plaza A., Rodríguez L., Concha-Meyer A.A., Cabezas R., Zurob E., Merlet G., Palomo I., Fuentes E. Effects of extraction methods on phenolic content, antioxidant and antiplatelet activities of tomato pomace extracts. Plants. 2023;12:1–20. doi: 10.3390/plants12051188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Perea-Domínguez X.P., Hernández-Gastelum L.Z., Olivas-Olguin H.R., Espinosa-Alonso L.G., Valdez-Morales M., Medina-Godoy S. Phenolic composition of tomato varieties and an industrial tomato by-product: free, conjugated and bound phenolics and antioxidant activity. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018;55:3453–3461. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3269-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Valdez-Morales M., Espinosa-Alonso L.G., Espinoza-Torres L.C., Delgado-Vargas F., Medina-Godoy S. Phenolic content and antioxidant and antimutagenic activities in tomato peel, seeds, and byproducts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:5281–5289. doi: 10.1021/jf5012374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vorobyova V., Skiba M., Vasyliev G. Extraction of phenolic compounds from tomato pomace using choline chloride–based deep eutectic solvents. J. Food Meas. Char. 2022;16:1087–1104. doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-01238-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Vasyliev G., Lyudmyla K., Hladun K., Skiba M., Vorobyova V. Valorization of tomato pomace: extraction of value-added components by deep eutectic solvents and their application in the formulation of cosmetic emulsions. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery. 2022;12:95–111. doi: 10.1007/s13399-022-02337-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Abbasi-Parizad P., De Nisi P., Adani F., Sciarria T.P., Squillace P., Scarafoni A., Iametti S., Scaglia B. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of the crude extracts of raw and fermented tomato pomace and their correlations with aglycate-polyphenols. Antioxidants. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/antiox9020179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.King A.J., Zeidler G. Tomato pomace may be a good source of vitamin E in broiler diets, Calif. Agric. For. 2004;58:59–62. doi: 10.3733/ca.v058n01p59. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Shen J., Luo F., Lin Q. Policosanol: extraction and biological functions. J. Funct.Foods. 2019;57:351–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Shao D., Venkitasamy C., Li X., Pan Z., Shi J., Wang B., Teh H.E., McHugh T.H. Thermal and storage characteristics of tomato seed oil. Lwt. 2015;63:191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sujith Kumar M.S., Mawlong I., Singh D. Phytosterol recovery from oilseeds: recent advances. J. Food Process. Eng. 2017;40:1–9. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Nandasiri R., Eskin N.A.M. first ed. Elsevier Inc.; 2022. Canolol and its Derivatives : A Novel Bioactive with Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Widjaja G., iqbal doewes R., Rudiansyah M., Sultan M.Q., Ansari M.J., Izzat S.E., Al Jaber M.S., Kzar H.H., Mustafa Y.F., Hammid A.T., Turki Jalil A., Aravindhan S. Effect of tomato consumption on inflammatory markers in health and disease status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN. 2022;50:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Shao D., Bartley G.E., Yokoyama W., Pan Z., Zhang H., Zhang A. Plasma and hepatic cholesterol-lowering effects of tomato pomace, tomato seed oil and defatted tomato seed in hamsters fed with high-fat diets. Food Chem. 2013;139:589–596. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Olatunji L.K., Jimoh A.O., Tukur U.M., Imam M.U. A review of the effects of policosanol on metabolic syndrome. Clin. Complement. Med. Pharmacol. 2022;2 doi: 10.1016/j.ccmp.2022.100058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ferreira-Santos P., Aparicio R., Carrón R., Montero M.J., Sevilla M.Á. Lycopene-supplemented diet ameliorates metabolic syndrome induced by fructose in rats. J. Funct.Foods. 2020;73 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Li J., Yang Z., Zhang Y., Gao B., Niu Y., L (Lucy) Yu The structural and functional characteristics of soluble dietary fibers modified from tomato pomace with increased content of lycopene. Food Chem. 2022;382 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ghasemi Baghabrishami R., Goli S.A.H. Tomato seed oil-enriched tomato juice: effect of oil addition type and heat treatment on lycopene bioaccessibility and oxidative stability. Food Chem. 2023;402 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kapała A., Szlendak M., Motacka E. The anti-cancer activity of lycopene: a systematic review of human and animal studies. Nutrients. 2022;14:1–14. doi: 10.3390/nu14235152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mirahmadi M., Azimi-Hashemi S., Saburi E., Kamali H., Pishbin M., Hadizadeh F. Potential inhibitory effect of lycopene on prostate cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;129 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.R. Chen1. X.C.L.W.* X.S.S.-G.P. Xin-Wen Nian1. T. Zhou1. H.-Z. Li1. Y.-W. Liu2. G.-A.X.C.G.-H.C.-L.Z. De-Pei Kong1. X. Lu1. Z.-Y.J.Z.-Y. Liu1. Sun Ying-Hao. Prostate cancer risk prediction models in Eastern Asian populations: current status, racial difference, and future directions. Asian J. Androl. 2019;21:1–4. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Soares N.D.C.P., De Barros Elias M., MacHado C.L., Trindade B.B., Borojevic R., Teodoro A.J. Comparative analysis of lycopene content from different tomato-based food products on the cellular activity of prostate cancer cell lines. Foods. 2019;8 doi: 10.3390/foods8060201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Moran N.E., Thomas-Ahner J.M., Wan L., Zuniga K.E., Erdman J.W., Clinton S.K., Tomatoes Lycopene, Prostate Cancer What have we learned from experimental models? J. Nutr. 2022;152:1381–1403. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Shivashangari K.S., Ravikumar V., Vinodhkumar R., Abdul S., Sheriff A., Devaki T. Hepatoprotective Potential of Lycopene on D-Galactosamine/Lipopolysaccharide Induced Hepatitis in Rats. 2006;170:151–170. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ghaffari M.A., Ghiasvand T. The study of kinetic inhibition of copper (ii)-induced oxidation of low-density lipoprotein by lycopene. J. Food Biochem. 2011;35:228–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2010.00378.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sharma S., Vijaya P. Cardioprotective effects of lycopene against cadmium induced toxicity in albino mice. Int. J. Health Sci. Res. 2015;5:507–513. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Scolastici C., Alves de Lima R.O., Barbisan L.F., Ferreira A.L.A., Ribeiro D.A., Salvadori D.M.F. Antigenotoxicity and antimutagenicity of lycopene in HepG2 cell line evaluated by the comet assay and micronucleus test. Toxicol. Vitro. 2008;22:510–514. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Sheik Abdulazeez S., Thiruvengadam D. Effect of lycopene on oxidative stress induced during d-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-sensitized liver injury in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2013;51:1592–1599. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2013.803579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Srinivasan M., Sudheer A.R., Pillai K.R., Kumar P.R., Sudhakaran P.R., Menon V.P. Lycopene as a natural protector against γ-radiation induced DNA damage, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in primary culture of isolated rat hepatocytes in vitro. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2007;1770:659–665. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Galanakis C.M. Separation of functional macromolecules and micromolecules: from ultrafiltration to the border of nanofiltration. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015;42:44–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Galanakis C.M. Phenols recovered from olive mill wastewater as additives in meat products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;79:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ahmad Bhat M., Ahsan H. Physico-chemical characteristics of cookies prepared with tomato pomace powder. J. Food Process. Technol. 2016;7:1–4. doi: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Mironeasa S., Codină G.G., Mironeasa C. Effect of composite flour made from tomato seed and wheat of 650 type of a strong quality for bread making on bread quality and alveograph rheological properties. ETP Int. J. Food Eng. 2018;4:22–26. doi: 10.18178/ijfe.4.1.22-26. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Mironeasa S., Gabriela G. 2019. Tomato Seed Flours. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Alazb B.R., El-Sahy K.M., AE-R M, S. Youssif M.R. Physicochemical and organoleptic characteristics of cakes supplemented with tomato pomace, mango seeds kernel and pomegranate peels powders. Plant Arch. 2021;21:432–439. doi: 10.51470/plantarchives.2021.v21.s1.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Salem B. Use of tomato pomace, mango seeds kernel and pomegranate peels powders for the production of functional biscuits. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 2020;47:1011–1023. doi: 10.21608/zjar.2020.110329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Conte A P.L., Likyova D L.A., S V Pellicanò TM Durum wheat whole-meal spaghetti with tomato peels: how by-product particles size can affect final quality of pasta. J. Food Process. Technol. 2015;6 doi: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Nour V., Ionica M.E., Trandafir I. Bread enriched in lycopene and other bioactive compounds by addition of dry tomato waste. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;52:8260–8267. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1934-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Khedr A.A., M A, Abdelgaleel M.A., Bessar B.A., Salama Effect of using tomato peels as a fat replacer on the sensory, nutritional and physical properties of beef burger and sausages. J. Sustain. Agric. Sci. 2016;42:469–490. doi: 10.21608/jsas.2016.2852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Namir M., Siliha H., Ramadan M.F. Fiber pectin from tomato pomace: characteristics, functional properties and application in low-fat beef burger. J. Food Meas. Char. 2015;9:305–312. doi: 10.1007/s11694-015-9236-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yadav S., Malik A., Pathera A., Islam R.U., Sharma D. Development of dietary fibre enriched chicken sausages by incorporating corn bran, dried apple pomace and dried tomato pomace. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016;46:16–29. doi: 10.1108/NFS-05-2015-0049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.El-araby G.M., Mark C. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences Processing Untraditional Formula from Snacks using Apple and Tomato Pomace Powder as a Source of Dietary Fiber and Antioxidants. 2022;13:59–64. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2022.133269.1051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Altan A., McCarthy K.L., Maskan M. Evaluation of snack foods from barley-tomato pomace blends by extrusion processing. J. Food Eng. 2008;84:231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Savadkoohi S., Hoogenkamp H., Shamsi K., Farahnaky A. Color, sensory and textural attributes of beef frankfurter, beef ham and meat-free sausage containing tomato pomace. Meat Sci. 2014;97:410–418. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Majzoobi M., Ghavi F.S., Farahnaky A., Jamalian J., Mesbahi G. Effect of tomato pomace powder on the physicochemical properties of flat bread (barbari bread) J. Food Process. Preserv. 2011;35:247–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2009.00447.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Andres A.I., Petron M.J., Delgado-Adamez J., Lopez M., Timon M. Effect of tomato pomace extracts on the shelf-life of modified atmosphere-packaged lamb meat. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016;41 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Belović M., Torbica A., Pajić Lijaković I., Tomić J., Lončarević I., Petrović J. Tomato pomace powder as a raw material for ketchup production. Food Biosci. 2018;26:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2018.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Lu Y., Mu K., McClements D.J., Liang X., Liu X., Liu F. Fermentation of tomato juice improves in vitro bioaccessibility of lycopene. J. Funct.Foods. 2020;71 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Zannou O., Agossou D.J., Miassi Y., Agani O.B., Darino Aisso M., Chabi I.B., Euloge Kpoclou Y., Azokpota P., Koca I. Traditional fermented foods and beverages: indigenous practices of food processing in Benin Republic. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022;27 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Añibarro-Ortega M., Pinela J., Ćirić A., Martins V., Rocha F., Soković M.D., Barata A.M., Carvalho A.M., Barros L., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Valorisation of table tomato crop by-products: phenolic profiles and in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020;124:307–319. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2020.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Skwarek P., Karwowska M. Fatty acids profile and antioxidant properties of raw fermented sausages with the addition of tomato pomace. Biomolecules. 2022;12 doi: 10.3390/biom12111695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Anihouvi V.B., Kindossi J.M., Hounhouigan J.D. Processing and quality characteristics of some major fermented fish products from Africa: a critical review. Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2012;1:72–84. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zannou O., Chabi I.B., Kpoclou Y.E., Kayodé A.P.P., Galanakis C.M., Selli S. Traditional fermented foods of Benin Republic: microbiological safety and health benefits. Discov. Food. 2023;3 doi: 10.1007/s44187-023-00043-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Igile G.O., Igile G.O., Bassey N.M., Agiang S.C. Quality characteristics of tomato juice produced and preserved with and without its seeds. Donnish J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;2 http://www.donnishjournals.org/djfst 1–009. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Westphal A., Bauerfeind J., Rohrer C., Ernawita, Böhm V. Analytical characterisation of the seeds of two tomato varieties as a basis for recycling of waste materials in the food industry. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014;239:613–620. doi: 10.1007/s00217-014-2257-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Szabo K., Cătoi A.F., Vodnar D.C. Bioactive compounds extracted from tomato processing by-products as a source of valuable nutrients. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2018;73:268–277. doi: 10.1007/s11130-018-0691-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Mironeasa S., Codina G.G., Oroian M.A. Bread quality characteristics as influenced by the addition of tomato seed flour. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;73:77. doi: 10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:12149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Rehal J.K., Aggarwal P., Dhaliwal I., Sharma M., Kaushik P. A tomato pomace enriched gluten-free ready-to-cook snack's nutritional profile, quality, and shelf life evaluation. Horticulturae. 2022;8 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8050403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.


