Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 25;63(5):2679–2694. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04035

Table 2. Overview of the Extracted Spectroscopic Parameters of Observed Sites and the Corresponding Values Predicted by DFT Calculations.

site type source δiso(ppm) CQavga(MHz) CQmin(MHz) η
THF–Al(OCUBE)3 exp 38.1 15.1 15.1 0.683
DFT 47.9 14.6   0.244
py–Al(OCUBE)3 exp 52.3 13.0 11.8 0.682
DFT 52.9 11.5   0.334
Et3N–Al(OCUBE)3 exp 48.2 11.4 10.7 0.848
DFT 53.1 8.4   0.226
TEPO–Al(OCUBE)3 exp 50.8 10.4 10.1 0.431
DFT 48.5 8.0   0.453
THF–Al(O2CUBE)(OCUBE) exp 49.7 12.0 12.0 0.100
DFT 55.4 11.5   0.950
py–Al(O2CUBE)(OCUBE) exp 60.4 8.7 8.0 0.510
DFT 60.0 8.0   0.974
TEPO–AlMe(OCUBE)2 exp 66.9 12.8 12.8 0.439
DFT 84.5 14.9   0.614
[AlO4] exp: 1–15 57.6 5.8 4.8 0.577
exp: 16/A 51.7 4.4   0.477
exp: 16/B 55.3 4.5   0.508
exp: 16/C 59.2 5.2   0.504
[Al(OCUBE)4] DFT 51.7 2.2   0.692
[Al(O2CUBE)(OCUBE)2] DFT 52.3 4.8   0.394
[Al(O2CUBE)2] DFT 50.9 4.8   0.018
[Me4N]+[Al(OCUBE)4] DFT 50.7 2.0   0.884
[AlCl(OCUBE)3] DFT 63.2 6.7   0.535
[AlCl(O2CUBE)(OCUBE)] DFT 64.8 7.5   0.902
a

CQ data obtained by DFT are taken as absolute values |CQDFT|.