Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2022 Dec 8;57(24):2699–2713.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.11.012

Figure 3: LCs localize at the epidermal and dermal edges of skin wounds.

Figure 3:

(A) Flow cytometry quantification of LCs in nonwounded (NW) epidermis and epidermal edges of WT skin wounds 1, 3, and 5 days after injury. LCs quantified as a percent of total epidermal cells Data are 5–9 mice as indicated. Error bars indicate mean +/− SEM. two-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons with each timepoint, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005, ****p < 0.00005.

(B) Representative flow cytometry plots of LCs (CD45+ MHCII+ epidermal cells) in nonwounded epidermis (NW, left) and at the edges of 5-day wounds (5d, right) in WT mice.

(C) Schematic summarizing genetic strategy to express membrane-associated GFP (mGFP) in mature LCs in huLang-CreER/mTmG (LC-iGFP) inducible fluorescent reporter mice.

(D) Representative flow cytometry plot demonstrating the efficiency of GFP labeling of mature LCs (CD45+ MHCII+ epidermal cells) in LC-iGFP mice.

(E) Schematic depicting tamoxifen treatment timeline and wound healing time points for histological analysis of LC-iGFP mice.

(F) Schematic of skin wound cross-section. Pink box outlines the epidermal wound edge. DWAT = dermal white adipose tissue, PC = panniculus carnosus.

(G) Fluorescent imaging of GFP+ LCs (green) and DAPI (blue) in epidermal wound edges 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after injury in LC-iGFP mice. Solid white lines trace the non-wounded epidermis, and the dashed white lines delineate the wound bed. White arrows label the LC closest to the wound center. Asterisks indicate non-specific labeling of scab, hair follicles (hf). Scale bars, 100 μm.

(H) Fluorescent imaging of GFP+ LCs in the dermis at wound edges of 3- and 5-day wounds. White arrows label LCs in dermis and wound bed. White dashed lines delineate wound edges. Scale bars, 100 μm. See also Figure S4.