a, TubULAR first extracts dynamic surfaces of interest from
volumetric datasets, here shown for the Drosophila midgut.
b, Constrained parameterization of the whole surface
facilitates tracking tissue motion. Mapping the surface at a reference timepoint
to the plane defines a material coordinate system, . Pullback images of subsequent timepoints are
optimized to be nearly stationary in the parameterization space. 3D tissue
velocities (white arrow) are obtained by linking the 3D positions of each
material coordinate across timepoints. c, Velocities decompose into
in-plane and out-of-plane tissue motions, here shown by a 2D pullback
representation of the tangential tissue velocity (colored quiverplot) and the normal velocity,
(red for inward velocity, blue for outward).
d, We integrate tissue deformations over time in the
tissue’s material frame of reference. Here, the gut is colored by the
location of each tissue parcel in its intrinsic material coordinate system
. Patches retain their original color as they
move, stretch, and bend. e, Tracking individual cells typically
involves laborious manual input and does not readily return tissue-scale
deformation patterns. Cell identities are colored from an in
silico dataset of cells on a coiling tube. f,
Cartographic projections using previously-published methods fail for complex and
dynamic shapes such as the folding midgut. (Left) Parameterization errors appear
when using ImSAnE’s cylinderMeshWrapper on complex
surfaces. (Right) Motion of cells in the pullback plane is large for adjacent
timepoints. g, For the same in silico dataset as
in (e), TubULAR maps the tissue to a series of images which change little over
time. By tracking the motion in 2D, we read out tissue deformation across the
full tube in 3D, here shown using the accumulated dilatational strain.