Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 7;23:38. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02033-z

Table 3.

The OR and 95% CI for RA according to RC tertiles

OR (95% CI), P-value
Model 11 Model 22 Model 33
n = 7,777 n = 7,777 n = 4,500
RA
RC 1.91 (1.54, 2.37), < 0.0001 1.94 (1.53, 2.45), < 0.0001 1.54 (1.11, 2.13), 0.0092
Categories
T1 Reference Reference Reference
T2 1.57 (1.25, 1.97), < 0.0001 1.46 (1.16, 1.85), 0.0015 1.13 (0.82, 1.55), 0.4599
T3 1.89 (1.52, 2.36), < 0.0001 1.83 (1.45, 2.31), < 0.0001 1.47 (1.07, 2.01), 0.0160
P for trend < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0097
TC 1.09 (1.01, 1.18), 0.0330 0.99 (0.91, 1.07), 0.7322 1.04 (0.92, 1.16), 0.5361
LDL-C 0.99 (0.91, 1.09), 0.8761 0.95 (0.87, 1.05), 0.3201 1.00 (0.87, 1.14), 0.9666
HDL-C 1.08 (0.88, 1.32), 0.4837 0.69 (0.55, 0.87), 0.0016 0.91 (0.66, 1.24), 0.5441

In sensitivity analysis, RC was converted from a continuous variable to a categorical variable (tertiles)

OR: Odds ratio; 95% Cl: 95% confidence interval

1Model 1: No covariates were adjusted

2Model 2: Adjusted for sex, age, and race

3Model 3: Adjusted for sex, age, race, marital status, education level, BMI, vigorous activity, moderate activity, hypertension, diabetes, smoker status, alcohol use, steroid use, statin use, PIR, and CRP