Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 7;24:121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05061-6

Table 1.

The Conceptual Framework of Value Creation for e-mpodera vCoP1

Conceptual framework of value creation for a virtual Community of Practice (vCoP)  
Indicators Measures/Metrics Codes Definition
Cycle 1- Immediate value: Activities and interactions
Level of participation

Members recruited.

Logins per user, mean (SD)

Users ≥ 2 logins (returning users)

Level of activity

Users ≥ 1 comment

Comments per user, mean (SD)

Comments per week, mean (SD)

Responses in surveys, mean (SD)

Questions asked

Agreement Identification Agreement expression and or identification with other users’ thoughts. Similar opinion.
Asking for help or an opinion

Queries/support asked about an area of interest (explicit question)

a. Ask for help or concrete query (open-ended questions).

b. Question asked (closed-ended), reflective or rhetorical questions.

c. Questions related platform and navigation

Level of engagement

Comments per forum (length of threads), mean (SD)

Comments in goals

Comments in other contents

Forum threads opened by users.

Users ≥ 1 point

Users ≥ 1 goal (n = 147)

Badges per user, mean (SD)

Quality of interactions

Nested chats: First comments (level 1)

Nested chats: Replicates (levels + 2)

Practice

experience

Members bring experiences and problems of daily practice into the learning space. Discussion on important issues: reflections of practice, barriers, and difficulties in general.

a. Problems and causes.

b. Solutions applied to main barriers.

c. Impact on professionals and/or patients

Quality of response Feedback on the quality of responses to queries. Reasons reported of the value of answers or resources shared.
Assertive disagreement Respectful participation when disagreement
Value of Participation Back Reengaging Evidence of people coming back to the community or re-engaging with the network and reasons reported.
Fun Evidence of fun
Networking2 Naming Name someone or answer directly to his/her comment.
Collaboration Number of writers in collaborative documents, mean (SD)
Collaborative initiative Joining projects or co-authorship
Resources and tools shared Shared tools /resources… Shared solutions or new ways to use tools and/or resources…
Reflection Feeling of community References to the community itself: being a group (meta-conversations) with a common mission (learning/ empowerment)
Cycle 2. Potential value: Knowledge capital
Information received Total Products exchanged by users (images, docs, links, etc.). Information received New information received and reported by users
Solution offered / Answers to questions Answers to questions asked. New practices to solve problems (explicit).
Skills acquired Skills, ideas, or resources to be applied

Self-reported comments related to skills acquired or resources to be used.

a. Likely to be used.

b. Reported to be applied

Change in perspective Professional change expectations

Self-reported change or reflection regarding own behavior/ Getting inspired.

Discussion on professional role

Confidence Risks taken, or initiatives taken An initiative started or risk taken by members
Level of trust Circumstance, mistake, or failure in own practice Self-reported difficulties, problems, or mistakes/failures from practices by members (bringing up difficult problems and failures from practice). Personal cases, not general issues.
New views of learning Learning and leadership Interest in learning and leadership activities
Cycle 3. Applied Value
Implementation of advice, solutions, insights Documents reported used. Implementation Self-reported comments on implementation of solutions, advice, insight. Ideas commented previously on the community.
Innovation in practice Innovation insight New ways of doing things. New perspectives. New concepts and language
Use of tools and documents to inform practice Results

Self-reported feedback value on tools or documents used or applied.

Self-reported reuse.

Use of social connections Social Connections Collaborative arrangements and problem-solving. Leveraging connections in the accomplishment of tasks
Innovation in systems New Systems Evidence of new processes and/or policies.
Transferring learning practices Transferring practices Use of the community or peer-to-peer processes and tools for learning in other contexts
Cycle 4. Realized value: Performance improvement
Personal performance

Members with certifications (20 goals and 1000 points obtained)

Members with more than 10 goals obtained

Organizational

reputation

Patient feedback3 Client feedback regarding empowerment reported.
Knowledge products as performances Client outcomes Direct delivery of knowledge products to clients (applied tools, resources to clients and outcomes)
Organizational performance Organization satisfaction If reported in final comments or feedback, satisfaction to organization
Cycle 5. Reframing value: redefinition of success
Community aspirations Reported new vision or learning objectives New learning agenda. New discourse about value. New vision. Community aspirations for future
Assessment New metrics New metrics, assessment, or ways to evaluate. Criteria change.
Relationships with stakeholders Relations with stakeholders Involvement of new stakeholders. New sets of expectations Different conversation with stakeholders reported
Institutional changes Organizational change New strategic directions that reflect new understanding
New frameworks New framework New social, institutional, legal, or political systems (emerging or created)

1Adapted from Wegner E, Trayner B, de Laat M. Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. 2011

2The platform doesn’t register the connections between participants, such us a user’s lists, or followers

3Patients were not asked directly about satisfaction or professional change