Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 10;10(1):e23517. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23517

Table 1.

Calculated interaction energies (kJ mol−1), %Ecomp contributions to stabilization energy for selected HB and close contacts in BTC 2a.

Interaction -Eele -Epol -Edis Erep -Etot %Eelea %Edisa Rb
C21–H21···Cg2iv,c 9.5 5.5 89.5 44.8 64.5 9.1 85.6 7.11
C2–O2···Cg5iv,c
Cg1···Cg4viii,c
C5–H5⋯N13i 35.8 9.3 35.1 52.9 42.5 44.6 43.8 11.9
C2–O2⋯C2vi 12.6 3.5 46.7 25.9 40.5 20.1 74.4 11.0
C8–H8⋯O1ii 8.9 2.7 30.4 20.0 25.5 21.2 72.4 16.5
C30–H30⋯F34iii 23.9 4.2 18.7 29.4 26.5 51.1 40.0 16.9
Cg3···Cg3vii,c 7.6 3.3 30.8 16.1 27.4 18.2 73.9 13.6
C25–H25···Cg4v,c 5.3 0.9 32.3 18.2 23.1 13.8 83.9 7.67
a

The % contribution of Ecomp (%Ecomp) is calculated through (Ecomp/Estab) × 100 where Estab = Eele + Epol + Edisp.

b

R = distance between centroids of the interacting molecules in Å.

c

Cg is the centroid of the n ring formed by the atoms indicated in parenthesis: Cg1 (N11–C15), Cg2 (N27–C26), Cg3 (N29–C33), Cg4 (C5–C10) and Cg5 (C16–C21).