Table 6.
Results of evaluation tests of microcapsule formulations studied in stage 4.
Evaluation test |
Formulation |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F10 | F4 | F11 | F12 | F13 | F14 | F15 | F16 | |
Polymer viscosity grade | Ethylcellulose N 100 | Ethocel St 20 | ||||||
Drug Polymer ratio | 4:1 | 3:1 | 2:1 | 1:1 | 4:1 | 3:1 | 2:1 | 1:1 |
Water content (%) | 1.727 ± 0.211 | 1.120 ± 0.110 | 1.093 ± 0.131 | 1.113 ± 0.154 |
1.650 ± 0.131 | 1.110 ± 0.082 | 1.190 ± 0.111 | 1.173 ± 0.121 |
Flowability | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent |
Bulk density (g/cm3 | 0.277 ± 0.001 | 0.293 ± 0.003 | 0.332 ± 0.003 | 0.399 ± 0.003 |
0.274 ± 0.001 | 0.298 ± 0.004 | 0.333 ± 0.005 | 0.398 ± 0.004 |
Tapped density (g/cm3) | 0.294 ± 0.002 | 0.311 ± 0.002 | 0.363 ± 0.003 | 0.439 ± 0.003 |
0.299 ± 0.003 | 0.313 ± 0.003 | 0.359 ± 0.004 | 0.441 ± 0.004 |
Angle of repose | 28.423 ± 0.855 | 27.447 ± 0.604 | 27.713 ± 0.596 | 27.036 ± 1.027 |
28.313 ± 0.908 | 26.323 ± 0.947 | 26.337 ± 0.530 | 27.370 ± 0.771 |
Carr's index | 5.911 ± 0.340 | 5.632 ± 0.298 | 8.465 ± 0.349 | 9.269 ± 1.066 |
8.223 ± 0.975 | 4.863 ± 0.356 | 7.177 ± 0.297 | 9.729 ± 0.214 |
Hausner ratio | 1.063 ± 0.004 | 1.060 ± 0.003 | 1.092 ± 0.004 | 1.102 ±0.013 |
1.090 ± 0.012 | 1.051 ± 0.004 | 1.077 ± 0.003 | 1.108 ± 0.003 |
Encapsulation Efficiency (%) | 96.327 ± 0.763 | 97.107 ± 0.994 | 98.717 ± 0.880 | 101.060 ± 1.091 | 97.647 ± 0.869 | 98.323 ± 0.854 | 99.240 ± 0.404 | 101.220 ± 1.484 |
Production Yield (%) (pooled) | 96.34 | 97.27 | 95.66 | 93.15 | 97.03 | 96.89 | 96.93 | 94.76 |
Results represent the average of 3 recorded reading for each test.