Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 8;22:21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01094-3

Table 1.

Summary of the factors that influence cervical cancer screening programme implementation based on findings synthesized from quantitative studies, 2022

Factors Correlation with screening Statistically significant effect on screening No. of studies Conclusion
Positive Negative Increasing Decreasing
Individual-level factors
 Age (≥ 30 years) 12 1 12 1 13 Facilitator
 Educational status (≥ primary) 9 9 9 Facilitator
 Income 7 8 3 10 Facilitator
 Occupation (government 2 2 2 Facilitator
 Employment (yes) 1 1 - Facilitator
 Residence (urban) 3 1 2 1 4 Facilitator
 Religion (Christian) 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Knowledge (good) 13 2 13 1 26 Facilitator
 Perceived susceptibility 8 2 8 1 10 Facilitator
 Perceived fear ( test result, pain, removing womb 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Attitude (positive) 3 3 3 Facilitator
 History of illness (family) 4 4 4 Facilitator
 History of visiting health facility 1 1 Limited evidence
Interpersonal level factors
 Partners refusal (disapproval) 2 - 2 2 Barrier
 Family size 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Peer attitude (positive subjective norm) 2 2 2 Facilitator
Organizational-level factors
 Provider recommendation 4 - 3 1 4 Facilitator
 Provider knowledge 1 1 1 1 2 Limited evidence
 Attitude of provider 1 2 1 2 3 Barriers
 Source of information (provider) 2 2 - 2 Facilitator
 Sex (male) 3 3 3 Barrier
 Type of profession (physician) 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Facility working 1 1 1 1 2 Limited evidence
Community-level factors
 Social stigmatization 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Social values and beliefs 2 2 2 Barriers
Health system and policy-level factors
 Inaccessibility to healthcare services 4 4 4 Barrier
 Cost of CC screening services 1 1 2 3 Barrier
 Financial incentive (free treatment) 2 2 1 2 Facilitator
 Health education programme 4 1 4 1 5 Facilitator
 Long queues 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Long distance from healthcare facility 3 3 - 3 Barrier
 Having health insurance coverage 4 4 4 Barrier
 Satisfaction with screening services 1 1 1 1 1 Inconclusive
 Quality of screening services 1 1 1 Limited evidence
 Lack of national cancer prevention policies 1 - 1 1 Limited evidence
 Healthcare involvement as bad 1 1 1 Limited evidence