Table 5.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis between the factors associated with unwanted pregnancy in Uganda, UDHS 2016
| Variables | Model- 1 | Model- 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR (95% CI) | P-Value | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Age | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
| 15–9 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20–29 | 0.55 (0.48—0.64 | 0.58 (0.50–0.68) | ||
| 30–39 | 0.64 (0.55- 0.75) | 0.64 (0.54- 0.75) | ||
| 40–49 | 1.03 (0.85 1.25) | 1.01 (0.83–1.23) | ||
| Domicile | 0.01 | < 0.001 | ||
| Urban | 1 | 1 | ||
| Rural | 1.56 (1.41–1.72) | 1.44 (1.29 -1.59) | ||
| Education level | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
| Illiterate | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary | 1.56 (1.38–1.77) | 1.70 (1.4- 1.94) | ||
| Secondary | 1.11 (1.02- 1.36) | 1.38 (1.18- 1.60) | ||
| Higher | 0.61 (0.50–0.76) | 0.75 (0.60- 0.93) | ||
| Husband education | ||||
| Illiterate | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary | 2.33(1.94–2.79) | < 0.001 | 2.30 (1.90–2.78) | < 0.001 |
| Secondary | 1.96(1.62–2.38) | 2.02 (1.65- 2.47) | ||
| Higher | 1.49v(1.20–1.84) | 1.54 (1.23- 1.92) | ||
| Husband occupation | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
| White collar | 1 | 1 | ||
| Blue collar | 1.44 (1.26–1.64) | 1.38(1.20–1.58) | ||
| Wealth Status | 0.02 | < 0.01 | ||
| Poor | 1 | 1 | ||
| Middle | 0.88 (0.81–0.96) | 1.57(1.39–1.77) | ||
| Rich | 0.56 (0.47- 0.59) | 0.61 (0.54–0.68) | ||
| Currently employment | < 0.01 | < 0.001 | ||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.21(1.10- 1.34) | 1.24 (1.12–1.37) | ||
| Age at first birth | < 0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| < 18 | 1.49 (1.37–1.61) | 1.49 (1.37–1.62) | ||
| > = 18 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Decision maker for using contraception | 0.04 | 0.001 | ||
| Joint/ Husband | 1 | 1 | ||
| Participant | 1.28 (1.10–1.48) | 1.28(1.10–1.48) | ||
| Unmet need of contraceptive | 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 3.50 (3.21- 3.8) | 3.97 (3.61–4.37) | ||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||