Table 4.

Responses for all items in part C of the survey, presented in their respective Normalisation Process Theory domain.

	Agree n (%)	Neutral n (%)	Disagree n (%)	Excluded or missing n
Coherence
I can see how PAP differs from usual ways of working	97 (70)	40 (29)	2 (1)	4
Staff in this organisation have a shared understanding of the purpose of PAP	60 (44)	65 (47)	12 (9)	6
I understand how PAP affects the nature of my work	54 (42)	61 (47)	15 (12)	13
I can see the potential value of PAP for my work	82 (61)	40 (30)	13 (10)	8
Cognitive participation
There are key people who drive PAP forward and get others involved	52 (39)	29 (22)	51 (39)	11
I believe that participating in PAP is a legitimate part of my role	65 (47)	53 (39)	19 (14)	6
I’m open to working with colleagues in new ways to use PAP	115 (82)	20 (14)	6 (4)	2
I will continue to support PAP	96 (70)	37 (27)	5 (4)	5
Collective action
I can easily integrate PAP into my existing work	65 (47)	44 (32)	29 (21)	5
PAP disrupts working relationships	9 (7)	33 (24)	95 (69)	6
I have confidence in other people’s ability to use PAP	91 (65)	41 (29)	9 (6)	2
Work is assigned to those with skills appropriate to PAP	69 (49)	59 (42)	12 (9)	3
Sufficient training is provided to enable staff to implement PAP	30 (21)	52 (37)	60 (42)	1
Sufficient resources are available to support PAP	39 (27)	58 (41)	45 (32)	1
Management adequately supports PAP	57 (41)	68 (49)	15 (11)	3
Reflexive monitoring
I am aware of reports about the effects of PAP	65 (46)	42 (30)	33 (24)	3
The staff agree that PAP is worthwhile	47 (34)	69 (50)	23 (17)	4
I value the effects that PAP has on my work	43 (32)	68 (50)	25 (18)	7
Feedback about PAP can be used to improve it in the future	93 (68)	42 (31)	2 (1)	6
I can modify how I work with PAP	87 (64)	44 (32)	5 (4)	7

PAP: Physical activity on prescription.