Table 5.

Associations between dichotomised groups’ composite scores for each Normalization Process Theory domain.

	B	95% CI	p	Adj. R2
Coherence				0.057
Gender1	−0.086	−0.427 to 0.256	0.621
Practice location2	−0.484	−0.836 to −0.133	0.007
Years of practice3	0.319	−0.024 to 0.633	0.068
Cognitive participation				0.126
Gender1	−0.402	−0.735 to −0.069	0.018
Practice location2	−0.624	−0.967 to −0.281	<0.001
Years of practice3	0.241	−0.094 to 0.576	0.157
Collective action				0.157
Gender1	−0.056	−0.374 to 0.261	0.726
Practice location2	−0.738	−1.065 to −0.411	<0.001
Years of practice3	0.474	0.154 to 0.793	0.004
Reflexive monitoring				0.130
Gender1	−0.241	−0.572 to 0.091	0.153
Practice location2	−0.498	−0.839 to −0.156	0.005
Years of practice3	0.561	0.227 to 0.895	0.001

¹Groups defined as ‘woman’ (ref.) or ‘man’.

²Groups defined as ‘Gothenburg’ (ref.) or ‘other areas in Region Västra Götaland’.

³Groups defined as ‘<10 years since receiving medical license’ (ref.) or ‘>10 years since receiving medical licence’.

Analysis: Multiple linear regression.

B: Beta coefficient; CI: Confidence interval; Adj. R²: Adjusted determination coefficient.

Bold numbers indicate significant p-values.