Table 3.
Quality assessment for cohort and quasi-experimental studies.
Author, year | Question number | Overall quality | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||
NIH quality assessment tool for observational cohort studies | |||||||||||||||
Jakeman et al. (2020) | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | X | √ | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Fair |
Tavitian et al. (2003) | √ | X | √ | CD | X | NA | √ | X | √ | NA | X | X | NA | X | Poor |
Juan et al. (2006) | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | X | √ | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Fair |
Lopes et al. (2017) | √ | X | √ | X | X | √ | CD | NA | CD | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Poor |
Hess et al. (2009) | √ | X | CD | CD | X | √ | √ | X | √ | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Poor |
Carter et al. (2017) | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | X | X | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Fair |
Moadebi et al. (2005) | √ | √ | CD | √ | X | √ | X | X | X | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Poor |
Tanvejsilp et al. (2017) | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | NA | √ | X | NA | √ | Good |
Thomas et al. (2018) | √ | √ | CD | √ | X | √ | √ | NA | X | NA | √ | X | NA | X | Poor |
Lara-Júnior et al. (2022) | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | X | X | NA | X | X | √ | X | Poor |
NIH quality assessment tool for controlled intervention studies | |||||||||||||||
Karuniawati et al. (2019) | X | NA | X | X | CD | X | √ | NA | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | CD | Fair |
Notes: NA: Not applicable; CD: Can’t Determine; X: No; √: Yes.