TABLE 3.
Relative fluid-utilization efficiency R of the AI-based allocation method compared to the Vampire-based allocation, where we computed the fluid-utilization efficiency as the number of casualties restored per utilized fluid units.
| Available fluid units | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 36 | 40 | 44 | ||
| Number of casualties | 32 | 1.00 | 1.07 (0.01) | 1.13 (0.02) | 1.25 (0.05) | 1.33 (0.07) | 1.44 (0.14) | 1.53 (0.18) | 1.55 (0.20) | 1.64 (0.30) | 1.77 (0.36) | 1.70 (0.33) | 1.67 (0.32) | 1.66 (0.33) |
| 16 | 1.00 | 1.15 (0.05) | 1.25 (0.09) | 1.52 (0.27) | 1.66 (0.36) | 1.87 (0.56) | 1.76 (0.56) | 1.75 (0.56) | a | a | a | a | a | |
| 8 | 1.00 | 1.27 (0.15) | 1.64 (0.40) | 2.04 (0.89) | 1.90 (0.92) | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | |
| 4 | 1.00 | 1.75 (0.69) | 2.19 (1.06) | 1.93 (0.96) | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | |
Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) of the relative efficiency R for different numbers of available fluid units and casualties.
a
Indicates that the values are equal to the value on their left.