Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 1;131(1):13–18. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802013000100003

Table 3. Comparison of the clusters according to physical and functional variables (n = 145).

Variables Group 1 (n = 46) Group 2 (n = 94) P-value
n (%) Mean (± SDa) n (%) Mean (± SDa)
Regular physical activity
Yes 17 (36.9) 24 (25.5) 0.933*
No 29 (63.1) 70 (74.4)
Handgrip strength1 30.6 (± 6.0) 16.0 (± 3.6) P < 0.001
Physical performance (SPPB)
Balance2 3.2 (± 1,1) 2.5 (± 1.3) 0.006
LL strength2 a 1.3 (± 1.0) 1.0 (± 0.7) 0.840
Gait2 2.4 (± 1.0) 1.8 (± 1.0) 0.010
Total SPPB3 b 7.3 (± 2.1) 5.5 (± 2.6) 0.010
Functional performance
FIM items c
Feeding4 6.8 (± 0.5) 6.7 (± 0.8) 0.607
Motor self-care
Grooming 6.9 (± 0.3) 6.8 (± 0.7) 0.297
Having a bath 6.7 (± 0.6) 6.3 (± 1.3) 0.013
Dressing upper body 6.9 (± 0.3) 6.5 (± 1.1) 0.015
Dressing lower body 6.5 (± 0.7) 6.1 (± 1.2) 0.127
Using toilet 6.9 (± 0.3) 6.6 (± 0.7) 0.063
Sphincter control
Bladder management 6.4 (± 1.2) 5.3 (± 2.0) 0.003
Bowel management 6.5( ± 0.9) 6.6 (± 0.9) 0.810
Transfer to/from bed 6.7 (± 0.4) 5.3 (± 2.0) 0.142
Wheelchair 6.8 (± 0.4) 6.6 (± 0.9) 0.024
Transfer to/from toilet 6.7 (± 0.5) 6.5 (± 0.7) 0.094
Mobility
Transfer to/from bathtub or shower 6.5 (± 0.7) 6.5 (± 0.9) 0.045
Walking/wheelchair 6.5 (± 0.7) 6.1 (± 1.0) 0.094
Stairs 6.0 (± 0.7) 117.8 (± 7.4) P < 0.001
FIM total 117.9 (± 7.4) 117.8 (± 7.4) 0.010

aSD = standard deviation; *Chi-square test; 1Handgrip strength; values: from 0 to 50 kg; Student t test; 2Values: from 1 to 4, going from worst to best performance respectively; ªLL = lower limb; Mann-Whitney test; 3Values: from 1 to 12, going from worst to best performance respectively; bShort Physical Performance Battery; cFIM: Functional Independence Measure; 4Values: from 1 to 7, going from complete dependence to complete independence, respectively.