Table 3.
Grad-CAM results.
Original image Grad-CAM focus |
Enhanced ICM and TE image Grad-CAM focus |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICM/TE N (%) |
Other N (%) |
ICM/TE N (%) |
Other N (%) |
|
Both images correct N = 314 |
270 (86.0%) | 44 (14.0%) | 312 (99.4%) | 2 (0.6%) |
Both images incorrect N = 106 |
93 (87.7%) | 13 (12.3%) | 102 (96.2%) | 4 (3.8%) |
Only the original image correct N = 35 |
29 (82.9%) | 6 (17.1%) | 35 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Only enhanced ICM and TE images correct N = 57 |
46 (80.7%) | 11 (19.3%) | 57 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Total N = 512 |
438 (85.5%) | 74 (14.5%) | 506 (98.8%) | 6 (1.2%) |
Grad-CAM gradient-weighted class activation mapping, ICM inner cell mass, TE trophectoderm.