Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 9;196(3):248. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-12266-7

Table 2.

Variables used in the variability approach

Variables Category Units Weighting factor Reference
Range in predicted N and P concentrations in streams Water quality mg/L of N or P (logarithmically transformed) 0.5 for both N and P (Ator 2019, Robertson and Saad 2019, Wise et al. 2019, Wise 2019, Hoos and Roland 2019)
Minimum predicted N and P concentrations in streams Water quality mg/L of N or P (logarithmically transformed) 0.5 for both N and P (Ator, 2019; Hoos and Roland 2019; Robertson and Saad 2019; Wise 2019; Wise et al. 2019)
Range in N and P from manure and fertilizer application rates Factor kg/km2/year 0.5 for both N and P (Wieczorek et al. 2018)
Range in N and P from wastewater treatment plants per unit area Factor kg/km2/year as N or P 0.5 for both N and P (Wieczorek et al. 2018)
Range in N from septic systems per unit area Factor kg/km2 1 (LaMotte 2018)
Range in tile drain density Factor Fraction of HUC08 1 (Valayamkunnath et al. 2020)
Range in runoff rates Factor m/year 1 (Wieczorek et al. 2018)
Range in predicted nitrate concentrations in shallow groundwater Factor mg/L as N 0.5 (Nolan and Hitt 2006)
Range in predicted nitrate concentrations in groundwater at the depth of public supply Factor mg/L as N 0.5 (Ransom et al. 2022)
Mean percent residual in N and P predictions Accuracy kg/km2/year logarithmically transformed 1 for both N and P (Ator 2019, Robertson and Saad 2019, Wise et al. 2019, Wise 2019, Hoos and Roland 2019)
Total population served by public and domestic supplies per unit area Receptor People/km2 1 (Johnson et al. 2019, Johnson et al. 2022, Johnson et al. 2021)
Percent waterbodies in basin Receptor % open water 1 (Dewitz and U.S. Geological Survey 2021)
Mean biotic index in basin Receptor Likelihood stream is not in good biological condition 1 (Hill et al. 2017)
N and P delivered (yield) to downstream receiving waters Receptor kg/km2/year 0.5 for both N and P (Ator 2019, Robertson and Saad 2019, Wise et al. 2019, Wise 2019, Hoos and Roland 2019)

All ranges were computed from the 25th and 75th percentile of the HUC08 values. Note that the N and P variables were included in the ranking approach as separate variables. See supplemental information and Qi et al. (2023) for more details