Table 2.
Evaluation of the quality of the studies analysed and the assessment of the risk of bias using JBI critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross sectional studies
| Starr 2018 [22] | Starr 2019 [23] | Shafi 2017 [24] | Wilson 2006 [29] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Were confounding factors identified? | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Were outcomes measured in a valid a reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |