Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 26;16:1333217. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1333217

Table 2.

Depiction of study characteristics regarding dropout rates and adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation and placebo.

Study Participants Adverse events
Author Duration VitD
dosage
Allocated Dropout Clinical causes (VitD: placebo)
(% of allocated)
Lab**
Total
(n)
VitD
[n (%)]
Placebo
[n (%)]
Total
[n (%)]
Medical
Minor
Medical serious Organi-zational* Not specified Results
Parkinson disease
Bytowska et al. (2023) 12 wks middle 42 8 (38%) 5 (24%) 13 (31%) 10%: 24% 29%: 0%
Hiller et al. (2018) 16 wks high 58 1 (4%) 6 (20%) 7 (17%) 43%: 67% 4%: 0% All neg
Habibi et al. (2018) 3 mo low 120 0 (0%) 0 0 (0%)
Suzuki et al. (2013) 12 mo low 114 7 (13%) 3 (5%) 10 (9%) 7%: 2% 2%: 0% All neg
334 16 (10%) 14 (8%) 23 (7%)
Restless legs syndrome
Wali et al. (2019) 12 wks middle 35 8 (44%) 5 (29%) 13 (37%) 11%: 18% 11%: 29%
Total 369 24 (13%) 19 (10%) 36 (12%) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

*Organizational adverse events: nonmedical causes for having to discontinue the participation, the most frequent one was the inability to find transport during the COVID pandemic.

**Laboratory screening for abnormal levels of ionized calcium, phosphate, or creatinine, being all in normal recommended limits (all negative).

mo, months; neg, negative; VitD, vitamin D; wks, weeks.