Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 9;12:25. doi: 10.1186/s40478-024-01731-0

Table 3.

Comparisons of AD-related molecules between APOE genotype groups

N β (95% CI) P-value
APOE2 vs. APOE3 (reference) APOE2 (N = 45) vs. APOE3 (N = 156)
  Aβ40-TBS 174 0.36 (− 0.36, 1.08) 0.32
  Aβ40-TBSX 188  − 0.26 (− 0.78, 0.26) 0.33
  Aβ40-FA 188 1.12 (− 2.61, 4.86) 0.55
  Aβ42-TBS 186 0.31 (− 0.84, 1.46) 0.59
  Aβ42-TBSX 192  − 0.98 (− 2.02, 0.06) 0.064
  Aβ42-FA 197  − 1.07 (− 12.12, 9.99) 0.85
  apoE-TBS 196 0.61 (0.29, 0.93)  < 0.001
  apoE-TBSX 194  − 0.11 (− 0.26, 0.04) 0.14
  apoE-FA 197 0.03 (− 0.46, 0.52) 0.91
  tTau-TBS 176  − 2.44 (− 7.41, 2.53) 0.33
  tTau-TBSX 194  − 0.03 (− 0.19, 0.12) 0.66
  tTau-FA 201 0.14 (− 0.02, 0.29) 0.079
  pTau181-TBS 194  − 0.05 (− 0.23, 0.13) 0.56
  pTau181-TBSX 194  − 0.08 (− 0.21, 0.04) 0.18
  pTau181-FA 192  − 0.01 (− 0.27, 0.25) 0.94
APOE4 vs. APOE3 (reference) APOE4 (N = 152) vs. APOE3 (N = 156)
  Aβ40-TBS 267 0.82 (0.25, 1.39) 0.005
  Aβ40-TBSX 292 0.99 (0.51, 1.48)  < 0.001
  Aβ40-FA 290 14.04 (9.94, 18.15)  < 0.001
  Aβ42-TBS 289 2.29 (1.63, 2.96)  < 0.001
  Aβ42-TBSX 293 2.51 (1.88, 3.14)  < 0.001
  Aβ42-FA 303 24.96 (18.17, 31.75)  < 0.001
  apoE-TBS 303  − 0.29 (− 0.51, − 0.06) 0.012
  apoE-TBSX 296 0.13 (0.02, 0.23) 0.016
  apoE-FA 302 1.24 (0.85, 1.64)  < 0.001
  tTau-TBS 278  − 1.62 (− 5.16, 1.91) 0.37
  tTau-TBSX 296  − 0.18 (− 0.30, − 0.07) 0.002
  tTau-FA 308  − 0.13 (− 0.24, − 0.03) 0.013
  pTau181-TBS 297  − 0.14 (− 0.26, − 0.03) 0.017
  pTau181-TBSX 295  − 0.06 (− 0.15, 0.02) 0.14
  pTau181-FA 296 0.72 (0.49, 0.95)  < 0.001

β Regression coefficient; CI Confidence interval. β coefficients, 95% CIs, and p-values result from linear regression models that were adjusted for age and sex. β values are interpreted as the difference in means of the given AD-related molecule on the square root (tTau-TBS), cube root (apoE-TBSX, tTau-TBSX, tTau-FA), or natural logarithm scale (Aβ40-TBS, Aβ40-TBSX, Aβ40-FA, Aβ42-TBS, Aβ42-TBSX, Aβ42-FA, apoE-TBS, apoE-FA, pTau181-TBS, pTau181-TBSX, pTau181-FA) in comparison to the APOE3 group. P-values < 0.01 were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing separately for each fraction and each pair-wise comparison between APOE groups; significant findings are shown in bold