Table 2.
Effect of five significant SNPs on beef marbling score in a Japanese Black cattle population (n = 529)
| SNP | Genotype frequency (n) | Allelic frequency | BMS (least square mean) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ± SE | ||||||||
| ICAM1 c.470C > G | CC | CG | GG | C | G | CC | CG | GG |
| 0.127 (67) | 0.548 (290) | 0.325 (172) | 0.40 | 0.60 | 6.144ab | 6.371a | 5.629b | |
| ± 0.271 | ± 0.171 | ± 0.201 | ||||||
| ICAM1 c.994G > A | GG | GA | AA | G | A | GG | GA | AA |
| 0.100 (53) | 0.561 (297) | 0.338 (179) | 0.38 | 0.62 | 6.049ab | 6.371a | 5.640b | |
| ± 0.298 | ± 0.169 | ± 0.200 | ||||||
| ICAM5 c.1065G > C | GG | GC | CC | G | C | GG | GC | CC |
| 0.130 (69) | 0.531 (281) | 0.338 (179) | 0.40 | 0.60 | 6.204ab | 6.357a | 5.643b | |
| ± 0.269 | ± 0.172 | ± 0.200 | ||||||
| ICAM3 c.739G > A | GG | GA | AA | G | A | GG | GA | AA |
| 0.142 (75) | 0.480 (254) | 0.378 (200) | 0.38 | 0.62 | 6.360a | 6.412a | 5.650b | |
| ± 0.265 | ± 0.175 | ± 0.191 | ||||||
| ICAM3 c.494A > G | AA | AG | GG | A | G | AA | AG | GG |
| 0.127 (67) | 0.488 (258) | 0.386 (204) | 0.37 | 0.63 | 6.361a | 6.380a | 5.684b | |
| ± 0.275 | ± 0.175 | ± 0.192 | ||||||
a,bmeans with different superscripts indicate significant differences between genotypes