Table 4.
Intakes of selected food groups related to bowel health and dietary group at baseline and after 8 weeks of the dietary intervention.
Food group | Complete sample (n = 65) | Vegan group (n = 33) | Meat-rich group (n = 32) | p-values |
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 0 | ||||
Coffee intake | ||||
Yes | n = 33 (50.77%) | n = 17 (51.52%) | n = 16 (50%) | .903 |
No | n = 32 (49.23%) | n = 16 (48.48%) | n = 16 (50%) | |
Espresso intake | ||||
Yes | n = 7 (10.77%) | n = 3 (9.09%) | n = 4 (12.5%) | .708 |
No | n = 58 (89.23%) | n = 30 (90.91%) | n = 28 (87.5%) | |
NDMA intake | ||||
Yes | n = 33 (50.77%) | n = 14 (42.42%) | n = 19 (59.38%) | .172 |
No | n = 32 (49.23%) | n = 19 (57.58%) | n = 13 (40.62%) | |
Legumes intake | ||||
Yes | n = 29 (44.62%) | n = 17 (51.52%) | n = 12 (37.5%) | .256 |
No | n = 36 (55.38%) | n = 16 (48.48%) | n = 20 (62.5%) | |
Tofu intake | ||||
Yes | n = 21 (32.31%) | n = 10 (30.3%) | n = 11 (34.38%) | .726 |
No | n = 44 (67.69%) | n = 23 (69.7%) | n = 21 (65.63%) | |
Soy yoghurt intake | ||||
Yes | n = 4 (6.15%) | n = 2 (6.06%) | n = 2 (6.25%) | |
No | n = 61 (93.85%) | n = 31 (93.94%) | n = 30 (93.75%) | |
Week 8 | ||||
Coffee intake | ||||
Yes | n = 30 (46.15%) | n = 16 (48.48%) | n = 14 (43.75%) | .702 |
No | n = 35 (53.85%) | n = 17 (51.52%) | n = 18 (56.25%) | |
Espresso intake | ||||
Yes | n = 12 (18.46%) | n = 3 (9.09%) | n = 9 (28.13%) | .061 |
No | n = 53 (81.54%) | n = 30 (90.91%) | n = 23 (71.88%) | |
NDMA intake | ||||
Yes | n = 40 (61.54%) | n = 24 (72.73%) | n = 16 (50%) | .06 |
No | n = 25 (38.46%) | n = 9 (27.27%) | n = 16 (50%) | |
Legumes intake | ||||
Yes | n = 39 (0.6%) | n = 27 (81.82%) | n = 12 (37.5%) | <.001 |
No | n = 26 (0.4%) | n = 6 (18.18%) | n = 20 (62.5%) | |
Tofu intake | ||||
Yes | n = 24 (36.92%) | n = 18 (54.55%) | n = 6 (18.75%) | .003 |
No | n = 41 (63.08%) | n = 15 (45.45%) | n = 26 (81.25%) | |
Soy yoghurt intake | ||||
Yes | n = 17 (26.15%) | n = 17 (51.52%) | n = 0 (0%) | <.001 |
No | n = 48 (73.85%) | n = 16 (48.48%) | n = 32 (100%) |
Significant intake differences were found for legumes, tofu and soy yoghurt after the dietary intervention (week 8). The familywise error rate-adjusted Westfall-Young p-values for legumes and tofu intake were 0.001 and 0.019, respectively. Due to the unique data distribution of soy yoghurt intake in the meat-rich diet group (n = 0 vs n = 32 observations), a reliable familywise error rate-adjusted Westfall-Young p-value could not be properly computed for technical limitations. In light of the data, a significant p-value after adjustment is to be expected. NDMA: Non-Dairy Milk Alternative.