Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 26;16(3):539. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030539

Table 6.

Hypofractionation for lung NSCLC.

Trial Sample Size Inclusion Criteria RT Technique Fractionation Outcomes Median Follow-Up Results
SOCCAR [98] 130 Stage III 3D/IMRT
4D CT allowed
55Gy/20 fx
Concurrent vs. sequential chemo
TRTM 2.93 years TRTM 2.9% (CI 0.36–10.2%) concurrent vs. 1.7% (CI 0.043–9.1%) sequential; RR 1.25 (CI 0.55, 2.84)
CHISEL [93] 101 Stage I/II, inoperable or refusing surgery 3D SBRT 54 Gy/3 fx 48 Gy/4 fx
66 Gy/33 fx, or 50 Gy/20 fx
Time to local treatment failure 2.1 years Local progression: 14% SABR vs. 31% standard radiotherapy; SABR had improved FFF (HR 0.32, p = 0.0077)
RTOG 0915 [105,106] 94 Stage I/II peripheral inoperable IMRT
4D CT allowed
34 Gy/1 fraction
48 Gy/4 fx
Rate of grade 3 or higher 4 years Toxicity rates (Grade 3+):
34 Gy (Arm 1): 2.6%
48 Gy (Arm 2): 11.1%
Primary tumor failure:
34 Gy: 10.6% (CI: 3.3–23.1%) vs. 48 Gy: 6.8% (CI: 1.7–16.9%)
OS:
34 Gy: 29.6% (CI: 16.2–44.4%) vs. 48 Gy: 41.1% (CI: 26.6–55.1%)

Legend: TRTM: treatment-related mortality; FFF: freedom from failure.