Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 3;16(3):651. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030651

Table 3.

Analyzing the relationship between NLR and oncological outcomes using multivariable logistic regression.

Lymph Node Advanced Tumor Grading Locoregionally Extended State
Characteristic OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
NLR (Reference: low)
High 1.47 0.65, 3.36 0.35 1.98 0.97, 4.05 0.06 1.60 0.80, 3.18 0.17
Age 1.13 0.33, 3.82 0.84 0.76 0.29, 1.99 0.588 1.01 0.40, 2.51 0.97
Smoke (Reference: no)
Smoke 0.54 0.21, 1.35 0.19 0.79 0.32, 1.94 0.620 1.22 0.51, 2.93 0.65
Sex (Reference: male)
Female 0.58 0.20, 1.66 0.31 0.31 0.11, 0.92 0.035 0.57 0.21, 1.48 0.25
Clinical tumor stage
(Reference: cTa/cTis/cT1)
cT2 4.99 1.88, 13.25 0.001 44.10 9.29, 209.21 <0.001 27.01 5.97, 122.05 <0.001
cT3/cT4 13.19 4.72, 36.85 <0.001 32.22 6.73, 154.29 <0.001
Goodness-of-fit test Hosmer–Lemeshow test 0.97 0.25 0.91
AUC
Model with NLR AUC: 0.77 AUC: 0.78 AUC: 0.77
Model without NLR AUC: 0.76 (+1%) AUC: 0.77 (+1%) AUC: 0.76 (+1%)
(p = difference model) 0.51 0.55 0.55

NLR = Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence interval; AUC = Area under the curve.