Chitosan (CH)/gelatin (Gel)/nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp)/fibrin glue (FG) |
|
The CH/Gel/nHAp/FG-PRP biomaterial significantly promoted the viability of human DPSCs 2 when compared to the CH/Gel/nHAp scaffold in vitro
The CH/Gel/nHAp/FG-PRP biomaterial significantly promoted the osteogenic differentiation of human DPSCs 2 when compared to the CH/Gel/nHAp scaffold in vitro
|
[191] |
Chitosan (CH)/collagen (Col)/hydroxyapatite (HAp) nanofibers |
|
The CH/Col/HAp/PRP biomaterial significantly enhanced the osteoblast viability when compared to the CH/Col/HAp scaffold in vitro
The CH/Col/HAp/PRP biomaterial promoted the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts when compared to the CH/Col/HAp scaffold in vitro
Preliminary in vivo studies on rats demonstrated that the CH/Col/HAp/PRP biomaterial had the potential for shoulder joint repair
|
[192] |
Chitosan (CH)/collagen (Col)/gelatin (Gel)/ nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) scaffold |
|
During the first 5 days of the in vitro experiment, the CH/Col/Gel/nHAp/PRP biomaterial promoted the proliferation of mouse preosteoblasts and human osteoblast-like cells compared to the CH/Col/Gel/nHAp scaffold
The CH/Col/Gel/nHAp/PRP scaffold supported the osteogenic differentiation of mouse preosteoblasts in vitro
CH/Col/Gel/nHAp/PRP + BMP-2 3+zoledronic acid significantly accelerated the regeneration of the critical defect in the tibia of rats in vivo
|
[197] |
Magnesium-doped nanohydroxyapatite/collagen (MHA/Coll) scaffold |
|
Both the MHA/Coll biomaterial (group 1) and MHA/Coll biomaterial + PRP (group 2) enabled proper bone regeneration; however, the best effects were achieved by group 2. Indeed, the bone density, amount of novel bone and expression of bone-related genes were significantly higher in group 2 when compared to group 1.
|
[198] |
Gelatin sponge—GS (MHC-3, Kuaikang, Guangzhou, China) |
|
The proliferation of rabbit BMSCs 5 cultured on the GS-PRP scaffold was significantly higher when compared to both cells cultured on the GS biomaterial as well as to cells maintained in the presence of PRP
The GS scaffold+ PRP significantly promoted the expression of osteogenic genes (ALPL, Runx2, COL1A1 and OCN) in rabbit BMSCs 5 when compared to the GS blank scaffold
The GS scaffold+ PRP had the ability to release PRP in a controlled manner, which contributes to its longer bioactivity. In addition, a more robust tendon–bone junction in rabbits was formed in the GS-PRP group compared to the other groups. These results were also confirmed by higher histologic scores obtained in the GS-PRP biomaterial group.
|
[199] |
Silk fibroin (SF)/gelatin (Gel)/hyaluronic acid (HA)/beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) 3D-printed scaffold |
|
The SF/Gel/HA/β-TCP/PRP biomaterial significantly promoted the proliferation of human ADSCs 4 in vitro when compared to the SF/Gel/HA/β-TCP scaffold
The SF/Gel/HA/β-TCP/PRP biomaterial significantly promoted the expression of late osteogenic genes in human ADSCs 4 in vitro when compared to the SF/Gel/HA/β-TCP scaffold
|
[193] |
Polylactic acid (PLA)/gelatin (Gel)/ nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) 3D-printed scaffold |
|
The PLA/Gel/nHAp/PRP scaffold significantly enhanced the proliferation of mouse preosteoblasts in vitro when compared to both the PLA and PLA/Gel/nHAp biomaterials
The PLA/Gel/nHAp/PRP scaffold significantly enhanced the matrix mineralization and calcium deposition by mouse preosteoblasts in vitro when compared to both the PLA and PLA/Gel/nHAp biomaterials
The PLA/Gel/nHAp/PRP scaffold significantly promoted the regeneration of bone defects in rats in vivo when compared to both the PLA and PLA/Gel/nHAp biomaterials
|
[74] |
Polylactic acid granules (PLA)/BMP-2 3 polyplexes |
|
The PLA/BMP-2/PRP hydrogel significantly promoted the viability of rat ADSCs 4 in vitro when compared to PLA granules
The PLA/BMP-2/PRP hydrogel significantly enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of rat ADSCs 4 in vitro when compared to PLA/BMP-2
The PLA/BMP-2/PRP hydrogel significantly promoted the bone regeneration of critical-sized calvarial defect in rats when compared to PLA/BMP-2
|
[200] |
Electrospun PCL scaffold |
|
|
[105] |
Poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL)/β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/ gelatin (Gel) 3D-printed scaffold |
|
The PCL/β-TCP/Gel/PRP biomaterial released growth factors up to 19 days
The PCL/β-TCP/Gel/PRP biomaterial significantly promoted the viability, adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic as well as angiogenic differentiation of rat BMSCs 5 in vitro when compared to the PCL/β-TCP/Gel scaffold
The PCL/β-TCP/Gel/PRP biomaterial significantly enhanced the regeneration of large bone defects in rats in vivo when compared to the PCL/β-TCP/Gel scaffold
|
[106] |
Polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA)/chitosan (CH)/hydroxyapatite (HAp) electrospun scaffold |
|
The PVA/CH/HAp/PRP biomaterial significantly promoted the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human ADSCs 4 in vitro when compared to the PVA/CH/HAp scaffold
Both the PVA/CH/HAp/PRP biomaterial and PVA/CH/HAp/PRP + hADSCs construct accelerated bone regeneration in critical-sized rat calvarial defect models in vivo
|
[201] |
Poly(vinyl) alcohol (PVA)/Poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL)/silk fibroin (SF) electrospun scaffold |
|
The PVA/PCL/SF/PRP biomaterial significantly supported the migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mouse BMSCs 5 in vitro when compared to the PVA/PCL/SF biomaterial
The PVA/PCL/SF/PRP biomaterial significantly promoted bone regeneration in critical-sized mouse calvarial defect models in vivo when compared to the PVA/PCL/SF biomaterial
|
[202] |
Biomaterial composed poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL)/β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) |
|
The PCL/β-TCP scaffold enriched with hUCMSCs 7 and PRP, due to the best therapeutic effect, could be used as a scaffold for the reconstruction of bone defects surrounding dental implants (a study on miniature pigs with created mandibular bone defects)
The PCL/β-TCP/PRP/hUCMSCs construct may be used during simultaneous sinus augmentation and dental implantation
|
[203,204] |
Eletrospun poly(vinyl) alcohol (PVA) and polyether sulfone (PES) scaffold |
|
|
[205,206] |