Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):767. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030767

Table 3.

Correlation between bracing clinical outcomes of curve progression, curve features, gender and maturity.

EOIS (n = 111) Final Cobb Angle a In-Brace Percentage Correction a Final Cobb Angle ≥ 50 b
r p-Value r p-Value rbp p-Value
Gender −0.038 0689 0.064 0.513 0.036 0.705
Age at diagnosis −0.041 0.672 −0.070 0.472 −0.083 0.385
Duration from menarche to diagnosis −0.0256 0.013 * −0.113 0.289 −0.268 0.009 **
Curve type at diagnosis 0.206 0.030 * −0.021 0.833 0.048 0.621
Curve type just pre-bracing 0.268 0.004 ** −0.097 0.323 0.118 0.217
Age when bracing started −0.278 0.003 ** −0.194 0.045 * −0.233 0.014 *
Bracing duration 0.178 0.061 0.207 0.032 * 0.155 0.105
Body height when bracing started −0.320 0.001 ** −0.203 0.040 * −0.232 0.017 *
Direction of largest curve 0.342 0.000 ** −0.309 0.001 ** 0.192 0.044
Initial Cobb angle 0.398 0.000 ** 0.081 0.405 0.313 0.001 **
Cobb angle just pre-bracing 0.388 0.000 ** 0.102 0.295 0.334 0.000 **
Cobb angle first in-bracing 0.328 0.001 ** −0.744 0.000 ** 0.213 0.028 *
Cobb angle first stopped bracing 0.955 0.000 ** −0.170 0.080 0.771 0.000 **
In-brace percentage correction −0.116 0.232 −0.030 0.763

** p ≤ 0.01; * p ≤ 0.05; a: Pearson correlation (r) was used on continuous data. b: Point-biserial correlation (rbp) was used on categorical data.