Table 1.
Comparison of DLT features.
DLT | TPS | Price (EUR) | DID | OEM Support | Consensus Mechanism |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethereum | 30 | 0.37 1 | Yes * | Yes * | PoS |
Polygon | 7000 | 0.028 | Yes | No | PoS |
Polkadot | 1000 | 0.07 | Yes * | No | PoS |
Cardano | 250–1000 | 0.8 | Yes | No | PoS |
Algorand | 1000 2 | 0.001 | Yes | Yes 3,* | PoS |
IOTA 2.0 | 1000 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes | DAG |
EOSIO | 4000 | 0 | Yes * | No | DpoS |
0Bsnetwork | NA | 0.05 5 | No | No | NG-DpoS |
* Unofficial libraries developed by third parties. 1 Etherscan, transaction gas fee estimator https://etherscan.io/gastracker (accessed on 14 December 2023); 2 Muhammed F. Esgin, Veronika Kuchta, Amin Sakzad, Practical Post-quantum Few-Time Verifiable Random Function with Applications to Algorand, Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2021, Volume 12675, Springer; 3 Algorand third-party STM32 https://github.com/salvatorecorvaglia/Algorand-STM32-MPU (accessed on 07/12/2023); 4 N. Sealey, A. Aijaz and B. Holden, “IOTA Tangle 2.0: Toward a Scalable, Decentralized, Smart, and Autonomous IoT Ecosystem”, 2022 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets), Palapye, Botswana, 2022, pp. 01–08, doi: 10.1109/SmartNets55823.2022.9994016; 5 0Bsnetwork fee 0.03 EUR/KB available online: https://www.0bsnetwork.com/ (accessed on 10 November 2023).