Table 4.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food Patterns 4 | OR (95% CI) | p-Value 3 | OR (95% CI) | p-Value 3 | OR (95% CI) | p-Value 3 |
FPSM | 0.91 (0.68–1.22) | 0.52 | 0.79 (0.6–1.03) | 0.076 | 0.75 (0.5–7.1) | 0.049 |
ONPL | 0.92 (0.77–1.09) | 0.32 | 0.83 (0.69–0.99) | 0.037 | 0.81 (0.67–0.97) | 0.025 |
FWVD | 1.06 (0.95–1.19) | 0.3 | 1.01 (0.9–1.14) | 0.84 | 1.03 (0.91–1.16) | 0.63 |
1 Data from three cycles of NHANES, 2007–2008, 2009–2010, and 2011–2012, were concatenated into one analytic data file, NHANES 2007–2012. Values are presented as OR (95% CI) obtained from multivariable logistic regression. 2 Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and energy intake. Model 2 was further adjusted for race, education, income, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity. Model 3 was further adjusted for BMI. 3 p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. 4 Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence intervals; FPSM, fats–processed grains–sugars–meats; ONPL, oils–nuts–potatoes–low-fat meat; OR, odds ratio; and FWVD, fruits–whole grains–vegetables–dairy products.