Table 5. Post-hoc analysis: Structural equation model coefficients (weak invariance model).
| DV: Loneliness during lockdown | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Variable | ß | SE | |
| Social media | Change in use of SM (T2 –T1) | .078 | * | .044 |
| usage | Baseline use of SM (T1) | .072 | * | .039 |
| Other interaction | Change in F2F communication (T2 –T0) | -.112 | ** | .016 |
| channels | Baseline F2F communication (T1) | -.077 | * | .019 |
| Change VC communication (T2 –T0) | -.003 | .031 | ||
| Baseline VC communication (T1) | .012 | .037 | ||
| Other media | Change in use of other media (T2 –T1) | .017 | .009 | |
| consumption | Baseline use of other media (T1) | .024 | .009 | |
| Controls | Personal COVID-19 restraints (T2) | .213 | ** | .028 |
| Work-life COVID-19 restraints (T2) | -.018 | .081 | ||
| Conscientiousness (T2) | -.034 | .033 | ||
| Agreeableness (T2) | .060 | * | .024 | |
| Extraversion (T2) | .031 | .027 | ||
| Neuroticism (T2) | .093 | ** | .026 | |
| Openness (T2) | -.054 | * | .025 | |
| Age (T0) | -.076 | * | .044 | |
| Female (T0) | .017 | .077 | ||
| Educational attainment (T0) | -.022 | .057 | ||
| Unemployed (T2) | .014 | .167 | ||
| Retired (T2) | .071 | * | .120 | |
| Living alone (T2) | .035 | .089 | ||
| Social media confidence (T2) | -.022 | .025 | ||
| Loneliness (pre-lockdown) (T1) | .616 | ** | .033 | |
| Interactions | Change in use of SM x | .003 | .010 | |
| Change in F2F communication | ||||
| Change in use of SM x | -.088 | ** | .018 | |
| Change in VC communication | ||||
Note. R2 = .600. ß = standardized coefficient; SE = standard error; SM = social media; F2F = face-to-face; VC = video chat. Number of observations: 825
*p < .05
** p < .01 (two tailed)