Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 23;16(3):335. doi: 10.3390/nu16030335

Table 4.

Association between serum iron and type 2 diabetes (stratified by magnesium levels according to physiological status).

N Case (%) OR (95%CI) p p interaction
Age, years Magnesium, µg/dL
≤60 ≤2673.2 645 169 (26.2) 1.34 (0.92, 1.94) 0.128 0.201
>2673.2 712 64 (9.0) 0.91 (0.54, 1.53) 0.727
>60 ≤2673.2 454 232 (51.1) 1.48 (1.02, 2.16) 0.039 0.332
>2673.2 387 37 (9.6) 0.80 (0.38, 1.70) 0.567
Gender
Men ≤2673.2 345 152 (44.1) 1.92 (1.20, 3.07) 0.006 0.073
>2673.2 427 48 (11.2) 0.95 (0.51, 1.78) 0.870
Women ≤2673.2 754 249 (33.0) 1.16 (0.84, 1.61) 0.358 0.383
>2673.2 672 53 (7.9) 0.88 (0.49, 1.57) 0.661
BMI, kg/m2
≤24 ≤2673.2 488 157 (32.2) 1.35 (0.90, 2.02) 0.145 0.989
>2673.2 514 39 (7.6) 1.26 (0.65, 2.46) 0.491
>24 ≤2673.2 611 244 (40.0) 1.49 (1.05, 2.10) 0.024 0.017
>2673.2 585 62 (10.6) 0.70 (0.41, 1.21) 0.198

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) and p values were obtained from the logistic regression model adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Serum iron was included in the analysis as a binary variable according to the median, with the lower group serving as the reference group. p-values for interaction were assessed using a likelihood ratio test to compare the models with and without interaction terms. BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.