Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2021 Jul 10;408:108310. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108310

Table 2.

Fitted mean EFR magnitude contrasts (in dB) between noise exposure categories.

Non-Veteran Control –
Veteran High Noise
Non-Veteran Control –
Veteran Medium Noise
Veteran Medium Noise –
Veteran High Noise
Sex Mod.
Depth
.05 .25 .50 .75 .95 .05 .25 .50 .75 .95 .05 .25 .50 .75 .95
Male 100% 0.0 1.3 2.1 3.0 4.3 −3.2 −1.7 −0.8 0.1 1.7 0.3 1.9 2.9 3.9 5.4
63% −0.5 0.7 1.6 2.5 3.8 −2.3 −0.7 0.3 1.4 3.2 −1.4 0.2 1.3 2.3 3.8
40% −0.9 0.7 1.7 2.8 4.3 −3.6 −1.6 −0.3 1.1 3.0 −1.0 0.8 2.0 3.3 5.0
Female 100% −2.0 −0.1 1.0 2.2 3.8 −2.9 −1.4 −0.3 0.8 2.3 −2.1 −0.1 1.3 2.6 4.8
63% −1.0 0.8 1.9 3.1 4.8 −0.8 0.8 1.9 3.0 4.7 −3.5 −1.4 0.1 1.5 3.3
40% −0.5 1.5 2.9 4.4 6.6 −2.0 −0.3 1.0 2.3 4.0 −2.0 0.3 1.9 3.6 6.0

Columns show the percentiles of the probability distribution of the mean EFR magnitudes for the difference between the two indicated noise exposure categories (the first category minus the second category). The mean contrast is indicated by the 50th percentile (.50), while the 90% confidence interval is indicated by the 5th and 95th percentiles.