Table 2.
Females | Males | Sex differences | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unconditional Model | Conditional Model | Unconditional Model | Conditional Model | Direct Assoc. | Indirect Assoc. | |||||||||||
B | SE | OR | B | SE | OR | % Reduction | B | SE | OR | B | SE | OR | % Reduction | Wald χ2 | Wald χ2 | |
Feeling Sad | ||||||||||||||||
LGBQ | .86 | .17 | 2.37*** | .59 | .19 | 1.81** | 1.62 | .38 | 5.08*** | 1.22 | .36 | 3.40** | 4.27* | |||
Victimization | .63 | .12 | 1.88*** | 16.00%** | .60 | .14 | 1.83*** | 16.92%** | 0.80 | 2.51 | ||||||
Cybervictimization | .78 | .13 | 2.19*** | 7.51% | .80 | .23 | 2.22** | 0.03 | ||||||||
Non-Parental Adult Support | −.13 | .03 | .88*** | 7.76%** | −.13 | .04 | 0.88** | 3.82% | 0.18 | 0.16 | ||||||
Suicidal Thoughts | ||||||||||||||||
LGBQ | 1.34 | .22 | 3.80*** | 1.06 | .22 | 2.89*** | 2.30 | .31 | 9.92*** | 1.80 | .29 | 6.03*** | 4.32* | |||
Victimization | .60 | .11 | 1.82*** | 9.79%** | .65 | .15 | 1.92*** | 13.07%** | 0.38 | 3.23 | ||||||
Cybervictimization | .75 | .21 | 2.13** | 4.72% | 1.05 | .38 | 2.87** | 2.13 | ||||||||
Non-Parental Adult Support | −.16 | .07 | 0.85* | 5.94%* | −.22 | .06 | 0.80*** | 4.75%* | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||
Suicidal Attempts | ||||||||||||||||
LGBQ | .96 | .22 | 2.62*** | .76 | .22 | 2.13*** | 1.60 | .33 | 4.97*** | 1.24 | .32 | 3.47*** | 2.44 | |||
Victimization | .55 | .18 | 1.73** | 11.07%* | .50 | .12 | 1.65*** | 13.50%* | 1.09 | 1.14 | ||||||
Cybervictimization | .72 | .23 | 2.05** | 5.32% | .41 | .33 | 1.51 | 0.60 | ||||||||
Non-Parental Adult Support | −.09 | .06 | 0.91 | 4.99% | −.20 | .07 | 0.82** | 6.65% | 0.24 | 0.20 |
Note.
p < .001;
p < .01;
p < .05.
% Reduction = percentage reduction in coefficients of LGBQ attributable to the confounder variable. Nfemale range = 926–1047 and Nmale range = 753–885.
Coefficients are adjusted by age, race and ethnicity. Wald Chi-square tests were employed by constraining each direct and indirect association of sexual identity and the confounders on the outcomes to be equal across females and males. A significant wald chi square indicates that beta coefficients are significantly different between females and males