Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 28;88(2):562–579. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01874-0

Table 3.

Two-way ANOVA statistics for Experiment 3 study variables

Variable Effect
Con n−1 Con Con × n−1 Con
F(1, 29) ηp2 F(1, 29) ηp2 F(1, 29) ηp2
Animal Simon within-task results
 ACC 3.03 0.09 0.04  < 0.01 1.51 0.05
 MT 83.66*** 0.74 0.23 0.01 31.49*** 0.52
 IT 6.85* 0.19 4.94* 0.15 0.06  < 0.01
 MAD 111.16*** 0.79 7.91** 0.21 21.28*** 0.42
Animal Stroop within-task results
 ACC 31.50*** 0.52 8.01** 0.22 4.49* 0.13
 MT 89.14*** 0.75 16.66*** 0.36 12.63** 0.30
 IT 25.84*** 0.47 7.12* 0.20 0.88 0.03
 MAD 118.36*** 0.80 3.57 0.11 6.16* 0.18
Animal Simon–Animal Stroop across-task results
 ACC 12.60** 0.30 0.07  < 0.01 1.09 0.04
 MT 46.57*** 0.62 4.79* 0.14 1.38 0.05
 IT 46.99*** 0.62 6.42* 0.18 2.34 0.07
 MAD 56.00*** 0.66 3.56 0.11 16.04*** 0.36
Animal Stroop–Animal Simon across-task results
 ACC 25.27*** 0.47 0.55 0.02 0.12  < 0.01
 MT 157.90*** 0.84 2.18 0.07 0.50 0.02
 IT 21.45*** 0.43 3.97 0.12 2.34 0.07
 MAD 163.70*** 0.85 0.75 0.03 4.77* 0.14

N = 30. ANOVA analysis of variance, ACC accuracy, MT movement time, MAD maximum absolute deviation, IT initiation time, Con congruency, n−1 Con previous trial’s congruency

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001