Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2023 Aug 5;25(1):142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.028

Table 2.

Means, Reliability, and Minimally Important Differences of Brief Pain Inventory and PEG Pain Scales in 6 Trials (n=1,710)

Variable SCAMP (n=427) INCPAD (n=274) SCOPE (n=250) CAMEO (n=261) SPACE (n=240) SSM (n=258)
Population Primary care Oncology Primary care Primary care Primary care Post-Stroke
Mean (SD)
• BPI Severity 5.7 (1.8) 5.2 (1.8) 5.1 (1.7) 6.8 (1.6) 5.6 (1.4) 2.9 (2.8)
• BPI Interference 5.8 (2.4) 5.7 (2.6) 5.3 (2.2) 6.4 (2.1) 5.5 (1.9) 2.7 (3.0)
• BPI Total 5.7 (2.0) 5.5 (2.1) 5.2 (1.8) 6.5 (1.8) 5.5 (1.6) 2.8 (2.8)
• PEG 6.0 (2.2) 5.9 (2.2) 5.4 (2.0) 6.5 (1.9) 5.8 (1.7) 2.9 (3.0)
Cronbach’s alpha internal reliability
• BPI Severity 0.83 0.79 0.87 0.79 0.84 0.86
• BPI Interference 0.87 0.89 0.88 0.86 0.85 0.94
• BPI Total 0.88 0.89 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.94
• PEG 0.73 0.69 0.76 0.72 0.79 0.85
Anchor-Based MIDs
A Little Better*
• BPI Severity 1.36 -- 0.73 0.87 1.17 −0.39
• BPI Interference 2.02 -- 1.34 1.41 1.67 −0.52
• BPI Total 1.82 -- 1.04 1.26 1.48 −0.55
• PEG 2.05 -- 1.25 1.18 2.02 −0.52
Distribution-Based MIDs
0.35 standard deviation (SD)
• BPI Severity 0.63 0.63 0.60 0.56 0.49 0.98
• BPI Interference 0.84 0.91 0.77 0.74 0.67 1.05
• BPI Total 0.70 0.74 0.63 0.63 0.56 0.98
• PEG 0.77 0.77 0.70 0.67 0.60 1.05
0.50 standard deviation (SD)
• BPI Severity 0.90 .90 0.85 0.80 0.70 1.40
• BPI Interference 1.20 1.3 1.10 1.05 0.95 1.50
• BPI Total 1.00 1.1 0.90 0.90 0.80 1.40
• PEG 1.10 1.1 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.50
Variable SCAMP INCPAD SCOPE CAMEO SPACE SSM
1 SEM
• BPI Severity 0.74 0.82 0.61 0.72 0.57 1.04
• BPI Interference 0.87 0.86 0.76 0.77 0.75 0.74
• BPI Total 0.69 0.70 0.54 0.63 0.58 0.69
• PEG 1.14 1.22 0.98 1.01 0.78 1.15
2 SEM
• BPI Severity 1.48 1.65 1.23 1.44 1.13 2.08
• BPI Interference 1.73 1.72 1.52 1.53 1.49 1.48
• BPI Total 1.39 1.39 1.08 1.26 1.15 1.38
• PEG 2.29 2.45 1.96 2.02 1.55 2.30
*

Absolute change in score from baseline to follow-up in individuals who reported on the retrospective global anchor that they were “a little better” at follow-up (4 trials). For the SCAMP that used Version A of the retrospective global anchor with 5 categories (rather than 3 categories) of improvement, score changes are for those reporting “a little” or “somewhat” better. Data not available for INCPAD.

Difference of 0.2 SD is often considered a small effect, and 0.5 SD is considered a moderate effect, with 0.35 midway between small and moderate. Some consider 0.35 to 0.50 SD differences as one distribution-based method for estimating minimally important difference (MID)

SEM = standard error of measurement = SD×1a, where α = Cronbach’s alpha. The SEM is a second distribution-based method of estimating an MID, for which 1 to 2 SEM are often considered the lower and upper bounds.