Table 3.
Effects of intelligent management in included studies.
| Allan et al. [29] | Burdick et al. [30] | Cvach et al. [31] | McFarlane et al. [32] | Varisco et al. [33] | Ruppel et al. [34] | Pater et al. [35] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of alarms | |||||||
| SpO2 alarm | NA↓, DA↓ | ||||||
| Heart rate alarm | NA↓, DA↓ | ||||||
| Respiratory rate alarm | NA↓, DA↓ | ||||||
| Arterial alarm | NA↓, DA↓ | ||||||
| General alarm | NA↓ | NA↓, DA↓ | RT↓ | NA↓ | |||
| High priority alarm | NA↓, DA↓ | ||||||
| Medium priority alarm | DA↓ | NA↓ | |||||
| Solo alarm | RT↓ | ||||||
| Parallel alarms | AI↑, RT↓ | DA↓ | |||||
| Questionnaire | |||||||
| Sensitivity to alarms | Per↑ | ||||||
| Changes in patient conditions | Per↑ | Per↑ | |||||
| The usefulness of alarm notification system | Per↑ | Per↑ | Per↑ | Per↑ | Per↑ | ||
| Alarm load disturbs workflow | Per↓ | ||||||
| Ignore alarms in an urgent situation | Per↓ | ||||||
| Nuisance alarms disrupt patient care | Per↓ | ||||||
| Workload | Per↓ | ||||||
| Perform different tasks | |||||||
| Important problems with patients’ status and care delivery | RT↓ | ||||||
| Triage unfiltered alarms | RT↓ | ||||||
Notes: AI = accuracy of identification. DA = duration of alarms. NA = number of alarms. Per = perception. RT = response time.