Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 25;115(2):589–599. doi: 10.1111/cas.16053

TABLE 3.

Efficacy based on MRI, clinical symptoms and steroid usage at the different study time points.

Therapeutic effect Lose‐dose group (n = 34) High‐dose group (n = 41)
3 months 6 months 3 months 6 months P1 P2
Edema volume effective 32 (94.1) 27 (79.4) 39 (95.1) 26 (63.4) 1.000 0.130
Enhanced volume effective 28 (82.4) 23 (67.6) 34 (82.9) 25 (61.0) 0.948 0.549
Signal ratio effective 31 (91.2) 22 (64.7) 31 (75.6) 22 (53.7) 0.067 0.333
Clinical symptoms' effective 0.917 0.752
Improved 22 (64.7) 17 (50) 27 (65.9) 19 (46.3)
Stable 11 (32.4) 9 (26.5) 12 (29.3) 11 (26.8)
Progression 1 (2.9) 8 (23.5) 2 (4.9) 11 (26.8)
Steroid usage' Effective 0.850 0.445
Improved 14 (41.2) 11 (32.4) 16 (39.0) 10 (24.4)
Stable 20 (58.7) 18 (52.9) 23 (56.1) 22 (53.7)
Progression 0 (0.0) 5 (14.7) 2 (4.9) 9 (22.0)

Note: Data are shown as numbers (%). P1, low‐dose group versus high‐dose group at 3 months; P2, low‐dose group versus high‐dose group at 6 months.