Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 26;16(5):6162–6175. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c15774

Table 1. Photophysical and Electrochemical Data of INXBCDTs.

passivating agents Tda [°C] Tmb [°C] λabs (soln) [nm]c ΔEg (opt) [eV]d Eox [V]e HOMO [eV]f Ered [V]e LUMO [eV]f ΔEg (DPV) [eV]g ΔEg (DFT) [eV]h
INBCDT-b8 (1a) 369 359 750 1.49 1.17 –5.61 –0.40 –4.04 1.57 1.91
INBCDT-8 (1b) 369 358 750 1.49 1.17 –5.61 –0.40 –4.04 1.56  
INClBCDT-b8 (2a) 340 335 780 1.44 1.23 –5.67 –0.29 –4.15 1.52 1.86
INClBCDT-8 (2b) 355 328 779 1.44 1.23 –5.67 –0.28 –4.16 1.51  
INBrBCDT-b8 (3a) 342 321 784 1.43 1.24 –5.68 –0.28 –4.16 1.51 1.87
INBrBCDT-8 (3b) 347 341 779 1.44 1.23 –5.67 –0.28 –4.16 1.50  
a

By TGA.

b

From melting point apparatus.

c

Determined in o-DCB.

d

Calculated by using the optical absorption onset, ΔEg = 1240/λonset.

e

By DPV in o-DCB.

f

HOMO/LUMO = −(4.44 + 0.64 + Eox/Ered).

g

ΔEg = ELUMOEHOMO from DPV.

h

The energy gap was derived from DFT calculations (alkyl chains are replaced with –CH3 groups).