Table 3.

State pairwise statistical significance (A) in practitioner's Subj1 EEG data; (B) in surrogate data Subj1_surrogate.

(A) Subj1
%	St1	St2	St3	St4	St5	St6	St7	St8	St9
St1	0	31	57	37	51	45	53	50	45
St2	31	0	32	28	45	39	31	40	22
St3	57	32	0	25	46	42	15	36	10
St4	37	28	25	0	39	31	13	39	11
St5	51	45	46	39	0	39	45	12	33
St6	45	39	42	31	39	0	29	38	26
St7	53	31	15	13	45	29	0	37	8
St8	50	40	36	39	12	38	37	0	23
St9	45	22	10	11	33	26	8	23	0
(B) Subj1_surrogate
%	St1	St2	St3	St4	St5	St6	St7	St8	St9
St1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St7	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
St9	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

For each pair of states, obtained by SDA, at the intersection of the corresponding row and column, the percentage of significantly different features is indicated according to the Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.01).