Abstract
Listening to music during dental treatment is widely accepted as a relaxation method. However, its effects are unclear on the psychological and vital parameters. Patients who came to the Government Hospital of 18 - 60 years old, medically fit and indicated for dental extraction and exhibiting dental anxiety were included in the study. Music was not played in the control group (n=100) whereas in the experimental group (n=100), music was played according to patients' preference under the genre western, classical, or popular. Blood pressure, Body temperature, Pulse rate, Oxygen saturation and Respiratory rate were recorded. Results showed no statistical difference between the control and experimental group except the respiratory rate which increased statistically in both control and experimental group. Thus, the current study reveals that the effect of music over an invasive procedure like extraction that has been perceived as painful treatment for a long time has little effect on adult patients.
Keywords: Dental anxiety, music listening
Background:
Dental anxiety is a frequently encountered problem, which has been cited as the fifth-most common cause of anxiety by Agras et al. [1]. Prevalence of dental anxiety among Indians is high when compared to that of western countries [2,3,4]. Anticipation of perceived or actual physical risk in an unfamiliar environment like hospital, loss of control, dependence on strangers, and separation from friends and family are some of the factors that can contribute to the development of anxiety and stress in patients. The anxiety scores have remained stable since the mid-1900s, despite improvements in modern dentistry [5]. Our body answers to real or perceived threats, both psychological and physiological. Some of the effects include tachycardia, high blood pressure, hyper-glycemia, mydriasis, hyperthermia, high cholesterol, cortisol secretion. These effects negatively affect important biological mechanisms and is also considered as a risk factor in the development of certain systemic diseases [6, 7,8,9, 10]. Dental anxiety is often associated with postponement or avoidance of dental treatment and, hence, poorer oral health and oral health-related quality of life. Treating such anxious patients requires more treatment time and resources. In addition reduced cooperation ultimately results in an unpleasant experience for both the patient and the dentist [11]. A study by Eli has shown that a strained patient-dentist relationship can lead to misdiagnosis of vitality of pulp [12]. Though there are many ways to identify dental anxiety, in this study it is measured using Modified Dental Anxiety Scale [MDAS]. The questionnaire was asked to be filled in during consultation time. The questionnaire consists of 5 questions grading from 1 to 5. Each question has five different options ranging from a score of 1 [not anxious] to 5 [extremely anxious]. The sum score has a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 25 [13]. Scores 5-9, represents patients who are classified as not dentally anxious or slightly anxious, and thus, not needing any intervention. Scores of patients with higher than 19 are deemed highly anxious, and they might be treated with more complex interventions [14,15]. Patients with scores between 10 and 18 are defined as having moderate dental anxiety. It is found that that individuals with moderate dental anxiety might benefit principally from noninvasive methods, such as listening to music. So patient with moderate dental anxiety score were included in this study. Though there are many strategies followed for coping with stress and emotions such as relaxation, hypnosis and distraction. In recent time music is used to distract the patient which in turn helps to reduce dental anxiety [16]. It has gained popularity due to its non-invasive method. Study by Eleni found that music therapy helps in decreasing the medication [17]. Thus, there is evidence showing that music reduces the negative impact of stress. Music is useful in all age groups to reduce dental anxiety. There are very few literatures on the evaluation of effectiveness of music therapy during dental procedures. A few studies reveal that patients stress level reduced while listening to tamil folk which comes under the genre of popular as people can better understand [17,18]. Extraction has a strong correlation with both pre-treatment dental anxiety and fear of pain during treatment. The subjective reactions by patients to extraction procedures such as local anesthesia, the pressure applied to the tooth during extraction, the tractions and noise recorded, and the time taken to cause anxiety is of interest. Although studies have examined the effects of music therapy in various fields of dentistry, the possibility of dental extraction as a risk factor for altered blood pressure, SpO2 and pulse rate remains unknown. It is a question whether dental extraction could cause a significant change in vital signs which in combination with psychologic and physical stress, painful stimuli that could cause harm or even death to the patient if not managed properly [19, 20] Therefore, it is of interest to report the effect of music on changes in the vital signs and anxiety reactions during dental procedures.
Materials and Methods:
This study was done in the Department of Dental Surgery, Chengalpattu Government Medical College & Hospital. This study was approved by the Institutional Research Committee and the Institutional Ethical Review Board. Materials used were Omron automatic blood pressure monitor, non-contact infrared thermometer, fingertip pulse oximeter and Zebronics portable speaker as shown in Figure 1. Patients who of 18-60 years, medically fit and indicated for intra-alveolar extraction and exhibiting anxiety based on Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were included in the study. Patients with systemic disorders, mental and physical disability, hearing impairment were excluded. This Randomized control study included 200 patients who were divided into two groups randomly. Music was not played in the control group (n=100) whereas in the experimental group (n=100), music was played according to patients' preference. Blood pressure, Pulse rate, Respiratory rate, Oxygen saturation and Body temperature were recorded using the materials mentioned above a) While waiting in the waiting room b) During the dental treatment c) Post treatment procedure. The values obtained were tabulated on an excel sheet. The respiratory rate was measured manually by observing patient's chest movement.
Figure 1.
Apparatus used for the study
Statistical analysis
The values obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Chi Square test was done to compare Blood pressure. Independent student t test was done to compare other variables. One-way anova was done for within group comparison for all parameters except blood pressure.
Results:
Statistical difference was found only in respiratory rate which increased during the procedure in both control and experimental groups. There was no significant difference in intra group comparison. However, other vital parameters showed no statistical difference.
Discussion:
This study was done to see if there is any effect of music over dental anxiety in patients attending a government hospital for tooth extraction towards high quality patient care. Many music theorists such as Bonny [21] and Gfelle [22] have stated that music has the ability to divert the attention from stressful stimuli and to refocus on pleasurable states. Therefore, the current study was carried out in 200 out-patients who suffer from dental anxiety. To begin with, in this study, music chosen by patients was played over the headphones as Spintge suggests self-chosen music is the most effective way to reduce stress. Although using of headphones reduces the impact of the music on staff [23], it does make staff-patient communication more difficult. Whereas, music played over loudspeakers has both positive and negative effects on operating room and over the staff: it can disrupt effective communication, but can also produce a calm working environment [24]. Table 1 shows that there is a significant difference in the blood pressure measured before the procedure between the control and experimental group. The blood pressure in the control group was lesser than that of experimental group. A possible reason could be the confounding factors. As the number of patients with stage II hypertension in the control group was lesser than that of the experimental group. On the other hand, there are no significant changes during and after the procedure. Studies examining the effects of music have had conflicting results. Literature on the effect of music while going through a painful procedure is still inconsistent. De Ramón LA et al. [25] stated that music therapy decreased systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate during extraction of impacted third molars. In contrast to that study, Kupeli and Gulnahar [26] found no significant difference between the groups regarding heart rate and mean arterial pressure. They concluded that this could be because of the individual differences in the response of the parasympathetic nervous system during the stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system.
Table 1. Comparison of blood pressure before during and after the procedure.
Variables | Control Group | Experimental group | P |
BP - Before | |||
Low | 20 | 23 | |
Normal | 16 | 10 | |
Prehypertension | 20 | 19 | 0.047* |
Stage 1 Hypertension | 38 | 29 | |
Stage 2 Hypertension | 6 | 19 | |
BP - During | |||
Low | 15 | 13 | |
Normal | 24 | 30 | 0.118 |
Prehypertension | 40 | 32 | |
Stage 1 Hypertension | 15 | 24 | |
Stage 2 Hypertension | 6 | 1 | |
BP - After | |||
Low | 9 | 11 | 0.314 |
Normal | 27 | 15 | |
Prehypertension | 33 | 42 | |
Stage 1 Hypertension | 17 | 17 | |
Stage 2 Hypertension | 14 | 15 |
Table 2 reveals that there is no significant difference in the temperature of the patient in all three situations. Similarly, there were no significant changes in oxygen saturation. Though, studies that measure the SpO2 and pulse rate during routine dental treatment are not common [27,28]. There are studies that have showed the oxygen saturation level remaining stable throughout the dental procedure. This could be due to the duration of the procedure. The average time taken to complete the full procedure was 15 minutes. Furthermore, pulse rate increased during the procedure in both the groups and subsequently decreased after the procedure. The sympathetic nervous system activity tends to increase during dental surgery, because of painful stimuli and psychological stress. This increased sympathetic activity would therefore increase the blood pressure and pulse rate [29]. Although there was a slight rise of pulse rate during the procedure, it was not significant statistically. In addition, it was also evident that respiratory rate was significantly high during the procedure in the intragroup comparison (Table 3) while there was no difference between the control and experimental group. This increase in respiratory rate could be attributed to needle phobia in adult population [30]. Furthermore, they said that clinician's response is not helpful thus concluding that a device needs to be implemented to improve patient's experience.
Table 2. Comparison of temperature in Fahrenheit, pulse rate, SPO2 and respiratory rate before during and after the procedure.
Variables | Control Group | Experimental group | P |
Temperature | |||
Before | 97.27±5.82 | 97.80±0.428 | 0.3655 |
During | 97.785±1.560 | 97.32±5.932 | 0.4641 |
After | 97.272±5.675 | 97.921±0.424 | 0.2649 |
Pulse rate | |||
Before | 85.54±11.63 | 83.87±11.97 | 0.3045 |
During | 86.20±13.43 | 84.33±13.19 | 0.3136 |
After | 83.03±12.89 | 81.50±13.01 | 0.3882 |
SPO2 | |||
Before | 98.17±0.94 | 98.32±1.01 | 0.274 |
During | 98.34±1.07 | 98.19±1.00 | 0.2967 |
After | 98.19±1.03 | 98.04±1.31 | 0.3547 |
Respiratory Rate | |||
Before | 19.06±3.49 | 19.14±3.56 | 0.8723 |
During | 20.81±4.13 | 20.49±4.08 | 0.5773 |
After | 19.47±3.75 | 19.69±3.96 | 0.6719 |
Table 3. Within group comparison.
Variables | Control Group | F value | P | Experimental group | F value | P |
Temperature | ||||||
Before | 97.27±5.82 | 97.80±0.43 | 0.853 | 0.427 | ||
During | 97.78±1.56 | 0.386 | 0.68 | 97.32±5.93 | ||
After | 97.27±5.67 | 97.92±0.42 | ||||
Pulse rate | ||||||
Before | 85.54±11.63 | 83.87±11.97 | ||||
During | 86.20±13.43 | 1.742 | 0.177 | 84.33±13.19 | 1.422 | 0.243 |
After | 83.03±12.89 | 81.50±13.01 | ||||
SPO2 | ||||||
Before | 98.17±0.94 | 98.32±1.01 | ||||
During | 98.34±1.07 | 0.838 | 0.433 | 98.19±1.00 | 1.576 | 0.208 |
After | 98.19±1.03 | 98.04±1.31 | ||||
RR | ||||||
Before | 19.06±3.49 | 19.14±3.56 | ||||
During | 20.81±4.13 | 5.804 | 0.003* | 20.49±4.08 | 3.072 | 0.048* |
After | 19.47±3.75 | 19.69±3.96 | ||||
*RR- Respiratory ratev |
Conclusion:
Thus, the current study reveals that the effect of music over a procedure like extraction that has been perceived as painful treatment for a long time in Chengalpattu has little effect on adult patients.
Clinical Significance:
To reduce the stress factor, though music can be used as one of the aids during extraction procedure at Chengalpattu Hospital, it requires additional aids.
Edited by P Kangueane
Citation: Ponni et al. Bioinformation 20(1):74-78(2024)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Agras S, et al. Compr Psychiatry. . 1969;10:151. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(69)90022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Malvania EA, Ajitkrishnan CG. Indian J Dent Res. . 2011;22:179. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.79989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marya CM, et al. West Indian Med J. . 2012;61:187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nicolas E, et al. BMC Oral Health. . 2007;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith TA, Heaton LJ. J Am Dent Assoc. . 2003;1:1101. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dettmer AM, et al. Psychoneuroendocrinology. . 2012;37:191. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Esler M, et al. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. . 2008;35:498. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Nat Rev Immunol. . 2005;5:243. doi: 10.1038/nri1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bellingrath S, Kudielka BM. Psychoneuroendocrinology. . 2008;33:1335. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pani L, et al. Mol Psychiatry. . 2000;5:14. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Appukuttan DP. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. . 2016;8:35. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eli I. Int Endod J. . 1993;26:251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kankaala T, et al. Clin Exp Dent Res. . 2022;8:1284. doi: 10.1002/cre2.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maulina T, et al. Open Dent J. . 2017;11:565. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dou L, et al. BMC Oral health. . 2018;18:1. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0563-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van der Weijden FN, et al. Psychology of Music. . 2022;50:365. doi: 10.1177/0305735621998439. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ikonomidou E, et al. AORN J. . 2004;80:269. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)60564-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Robb SL. J Music Ther. . 2000;37:2. doi: 10.1093/jmt/37.2.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Abraham-Inpijn L, et al. J Am Dent Assoc. . 1988;116:531. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bayat M, et al. Jdm. . 2005;18:45. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bonny HL. Music Therapy. . 1986;6:3. doi: 10.1093/mt/6.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gfeller K. An introduction to music therapy theory and practice. . 1992;234:50. [Google Scholar]
- 23.MacDonald R. Music health and wellbeing. London: Oxford University Press; 2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.George S, Ahmed S, et al. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. . 2011;27:354. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.83681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.De Ramón LA, et al. J Am Dent Assoc. . 2023;154:206. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kupeli I, Gülnahar Y. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. . 2020;78:546. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fukayama H, Yagiela JA. Int Dent J. . 2006;56:102. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2006.tb00081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rayen R, et al. Indian J Dent Res. . 2006;17:27. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.29895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsuchihashi T, et al. Hypertens Res. . 1996;19:189. doi: 10.1291/hypres.19.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alsbrooks K, Hoerauf K. PLoS One. . 2022;21:e0276814.. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]